Unexpected Factors That Influence Viral Detection and Viral Load Using Real-Time PCR
Main Article Content
Abstract
This communication takes note of unexpected factors that can influence the results of RT-PCR in quantitation of copy numbers such as in determination of viral loads and in viral identification. We show that the presence of serum separator gel in authorized collection tubes for hepatitis C (HCV) viral load determinations causes underestimation of viral loads by blocking viral diffusion into plasma and that the presence of more than one targeted virus in a multiplex RT-PCR viral assay, while not affecting analytical specificity, results in raising of the minimal detectable viral titer and therefore a decreased analytical sensitivity. Our results suggest the possibility that HCV samples should be placed in cell lysis buffer for full viral load determination and that multiplex assays should be carefully validated and modified if necessary to minimize loss of sensitivity.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Calderaro A, Buttrini M, Farina B, Montecchini S, De Conto F, Chezzi C. Respiratory Tract Infections and Laboratory Diagnostic Methods: A Review with A Focus on Syndromic Panel-Based Assays. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(9):1856.
3. Yehia BR, Schranz AJ, Umscheid CA, Lo Re V 3rd. The treatment cascade for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e101554.
4. Cartwright EJ, Patel P, Kamili S, Wester C. Updated Operational Guidance for Implementing CDC’s Recommendations on Testing for Hepatitis C Virus Infection. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72:766–768.
5. Technical Update for HIV Nucleic Acid Tests Approved for Diagnostic Purposes. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/guidelines/recommendations/technical-update-for-hiv.html
6. Zhang N, Wang L, Deng X, Liang R, Su M, He C, Hu L, Su Y, Ren J, Yu F, Du L, Jiang S. Recent advances in the detection of respiratory virus infection in humans. J Med Virol. 2020 Apr;92(4):408-417.
7. Uyeki TM, Hui DS, Zambon M, Wentworth DE, Monto AS. Influenza. Lancet. 2022 Aug 27;400(10353):693-706. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00982-5
8. Wang XH, Momeni A, Eid I, Li L, Brackett F, Davis-Smith B Wieczorek R and Pincus MR. Major discrepancies of HCV viral loads determined by real time polymerase chain reaction caused by use of collection tubes that differ only with the presence or absence of serum separator. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2018; 48: 286-295.
9. Wunschmann S, Medh JD, Klinzmann D, Schmidt WN, Stapleton JT. Characterization of hepatitis c virus (HCV) and HCV E2 interactions with CD81 and the low-density lipoprotein receptor. J Virol. 2000; 74:10055-10062.
10. Chamberlain J S, Gibbs R A, Ranier J E, Nguyen P N, Caskey C T. Multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In: Gelfand D H, Innis M A, Shinsky J J, White T J, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1989. pp. 272–281.
11. Raeymaekers L. A commentary on the practical applications of competitive PCR. Genome Res. 1995;5:91–94.
12. Elnifro EM, Ashshi AM, Cooper RJ, Klapper PE. Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Oct;13(4):559-70.