Wakefield on Harm, Health, and Homosexuality
Main Article Content
Abstract
Jerome Wakefield’s recent clarifications of the harm component of his “harmful-dysfunction analysis” (HDA) of medical disorder lead to three important conclusions. First, the analysis would be improved if he simply deleted all his remarks on the dependence of disorder status on social values. Except when trivial, they rest either on a false environmental relativity of disease, a false cultural-relativist metaphysics, or an unacceptable medical ethics. Second, even after this deletion of social values, the HDA still fails to match medical concepts, since it excludes all subclinical disease, as well as many harmless clinical diseases, and it can also find no harm either in essential pathology or in the diseases of nonsentient organisms. Third, the harm-based arguments that Wakefield takes to explain and perhaps justify the 1973 American Psychiatric Association decision to depathologize homosexuality do not stand a moment’s scrutiny; indeed, by his newly clarified harm test, homosexuality is clearly harmful to all homosexuals. So Wakefield should just drop his harm criterion and admit that disease is mere biological dysfunction.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.