↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background. Current approaches to teaching medical procedural skills were developed over 70 years ago. Developments in teaching, movement control, motor learning, educational technology, and understanding of human cognition need to be integrated into the contemporary teaching of medical procedural skills.

Objective. This scoping review analyses approaches to developing motor skills and examines the key elements supporting contemporary medical procedural skills training.

Design. The PRISMA-ScR extension was employed in this review. The methodology had twenty applicable items. The databases used were PubMed, ERIC, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, ProQuest Education database, A+Education, Scopus and Web of Science to identify papers and texts published between 1980 and 2023 related to frameworks for teaching medical psychomotor tasks, motor skills, and motor learning to inform approaches to developing medical procedural skills. Data were extracted independently by each of the two researchers, using a standardised form.

Results. Three main framework models were identified. An early model, a ‘see one, do one, teach one’ mentoring model, was recognised. The cognitive-based representative model gained popularity for medical procedural skill development in the 1990s and persists in simulation-based training. Most biomedical publications promote a cognitive representative model of skill development. The non-medical domains propose an ecological model of movements leading to a constraint-led approach. There is a lack of experimental evidence to support the effectiveness of these frameworks.

Conclusions. While medical education trains with a cognitive-based representative model, other domains have successfully evolved to a constraint-led approach. Further investigation into the applicability and evaluation of ecological models in medical procedural skills development is needed.

Scoping review registration: This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 12 No 5 (2024): MAY ISSUE, Issue 5, VOl.12
SectionReview Articles
Published26 May 2024
DOI10.18103/mra.v12i5.5394
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

KT

Kersi Taraporewalla

The Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Qld, 4029, Australia.; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

ORCID
PB

Paul Barach

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; Thomas Jefferson University, USA.

ORCID
JL

Jeffrey Lipman

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia.; Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes,

ORCID
AV

André Van Zundert

The Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Qld, 4029, Australia.; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

ORCID
Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗