Knowledge and engagement in research activities by medical students: challenges and new opportunities - an institutional survey.

Main Article Content

Heloisa Resende Júlio Aragão Guilherme Lopes Rafael de Souza Anna Beattriz Silva Katia Santos Daniely Moraes Clara Guedes Fernanda Perez Fabrício Tiago Miranda de Souza Riceli Fagundes Claudia Yamada Utagawa

Abstract

Objectives: to describe participation and knowledge in research programs by medical students from Oswaldo Aranha University Center (Centro Universitário Fundação Osvaldo Aranha, UNIFOA).


Methods: it was applied a survey during 2nd Symposium on Clinical Research - focusing on oncology in the South of the State of Rio de Janeiro. The survey was answered by medical students from UNIFOA, encompassing socio-demographic variables, and clinical issues.


Results: 73 participants answered the survey, 64.4% (47/73) of them registered up to 3rd semester. Regarding participation in academic research project, 79.5% (67/73) didn’t have any participation, more than fifty per cent 56.2% (41/73), tried to participate in a project, but only 23.3% (17/73) got success in this initiative. Concerning general knowledge in clinical research, 80.8% (59/73) affirmed not had any contact with theme up to moment in their graduation course. Questions evaluating knowledge in basic concepts, described that only 50.7% (37/73) of the students know the difference between basic and clinical research, and only 45.2% (33/73) know the steps of approval process involving medical procedures.


Conclusion: low engagement of medical students in research activities might explain the low rate of physicians working on this area. Their potential interest should be enabled by medical schools to increase qualified human resources which will accelerate Brazilian participation in clinical trials.

Keywords: Medical Students, Research Participation, Clinical Research, Academic Engagement, Research Challenges, Medical Education, Institutional Survey

Article Details

How to Cite
RESENDE, Heloisa et al. Knowledge and engagement in research activities by medical students: challenges and new opportunities - an institutional survey.. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 6, june 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5414>. Date accessed: 22 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i6.5414.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Subbiah V. The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29(1):49-58. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02160-z

2. Mahmud A, Zalay O, Springer A, Arts K, Eisenhauer E. Barriers to Participation in Clinical Trials: a Physician Survey. Current Oncology. 2018;25(2):119-125. doi:10.3747/co.25.3857

3. Gössling G, Rebelatto TF, Villarreal-Garza C, et al. Current Scenario of Clinical Cancer Research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Current Oncology. 2023;30(1):653-662. doi:10.3390/curroncol30010050

4. Clinical Trials Arena, Carmen. Brazil accounts for 1.7% share of global clinical trial activity in 2021. Published 2022. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/marketdata/brazil-accounts-for-1-7-share-of-global-clinical-trial-activity-in-2021/

5. Peig, D., Fujioka, W., Cardoso, F., Rebelo, F. Interfarma, 2021. A importância da pesquisa clínica para o Brasil. https://www.interfarma.org.br/library/a-importancia-da-pesquisa-clinica-para-o-brasil-3/

6. XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Oncologia Clínica. Trabalhos aprovados. Published 2023. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://www.congressosboc.com.br/trabalhos/aprovados2023.php

7. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estatísticas de câncer. INCA. Published 2023. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/

8. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Onde tratar pelo SUS. INCA. Published 2022. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/tratamento/onde-tratar-pelo-sus

9. Barrios CH, Mano MS. Is Independent Clinical Research Possible in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Roadmap to Address Persistent and New Barriers and Challenges. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. 2021;(41):221-230. doi:10.1200/EDBK_321335

10. Oyer RA, Hurley P, Boehmer L, et al. Increasing Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: An American Society of Clinical Oncology and Association of Community Cancer Centers Joint Research Statement. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2022;40(19):2163-2171. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00754

11. Somkin CP, Altschuler A, Ackerson L, et al. Organizational barriers to physician participation in cancer clinical trials. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11(7):413-421.

12. Resende H, Rebelatto TF, Werutsky G, et al. Current scenario and future perspectives of clinical research in Brazil: a national survey. Ecancermedicalscience. 2023;17. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2023.1640

13. Atallah ÁN. Evidence-based medicine. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2018;136(2):99-100. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2018.136260318.

14. SCHEFFER, M. et al. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2023. FMUSP, AMB. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://amb.org.br/

15. Sistema de Regulação do Ensino Superior e-MEC. Ministério da Educação. Published 2022. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://emec.mec.gov.br./emec/nova

16. Sacristán JA. Clinical research and medical care: towards effective and complete integration. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):4. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-15-4.

17. Matriculating Student Questionnaire. Association of American Medical Colleges. Published 2017. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://www.aamc.org/system/files/reports/1/msq2017report.pdf

18. Coronel E, Fregni F. Clinical research in Latin America: scientific production in high impact clinical research journals from 2000 to 2010. Int J Clin Trials. Published online 2015:28-33. doi:10.5455/2349-3259.ijct20150501

19. Anzai NE, Wieland J, Kasuya RT, Higuchi P, Cassel K. Medical School Clinical Trials Educational Intervention: Impact on Knowledge and Attitudes. Journal of Cancer Education. 2023;38(5):1479-1485. doi:10.1007/s13187-023-02287-8

20. Ciocca DR, Delgado G. The reality of scientific research in Latin America; an insider’s perspective. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2017;22(6):847-852. doi:10.1007/s12192-017-0815-8

21. Mark AL, Kelch RP. Clinician Scientist Training Program: A Proposal for Training Medical Students in Clinical Research. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 2001;49(6):486-490. doi:10.2310/6650.2001.33624

22. Arai RJ, de Lourdes Noronha I, Nicolau JC, et al. Academic health centers: integration of clinical research with healthcare and education. Comments on a workshop. Clinics. 2018;73:e515s. doi:10.6061/clinics/2017/e515s

23. Mass-Hernández LM, Acevedo-Aguilar LM, Lozada-Martínez ID, et al. Undergraduate research in medicine: A summary of the evidence on problems, solutions and outcomes. Annals of Medicine & Surgery. 2022;74. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103280

24. Rede Nacional de Pesquisa Clínica. Ministério da Saúde. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/folder/rede_nacional_pesquisa_clinica.pdf

25. HC - Hospital das Clínicas FMUSP. Quem somos? Published 2022. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://www.hc.fm.usp.br/hc/o-hospital/quem-somos

26. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. ICESP. Nossa história. Published 2022. Acessed March 4, 2024. https://icesp.org.br/nossa-historia/

27. Ferreira MJM, Ribeiro KG, Almeida MM de, et al. New National Curricular Guidelines of medical courses: opportunities to resignify education. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação. 2019;23(suppl 1). doi:10.1590/interface.170920

28. Unger JM, Hershman DL, Till C, et al. “When Offered to Participate”: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Agreement to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2021;113(3):244-257. doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa155