Assuring the Quality of Patient Experience and Outcomes in All-Virtual Nurse Telehealth Programs: A Case Report Illustration

Main Article Content

Mary Ann Adamczyk, MSA, RN Susan Butterworth, PhD Carrie Dawson, MS, RN, BC-NC Stacia Potempa, MSN, RN, BC-NC Marna Flaherty-Robb, MS, RN, CNS-C Margaret Calarco, PhD, RN, NEA-BC Philip Furspan, PhD Kathleen Potempa, PhD, RN, FAAN


There are many approaches to evaluating patient-centered care used by health systems in acute care environments.  Yet a growing proportion of care is happening in remote ways, using telehealth methods for chronic care management programs or health coaching for ‘patients’ living in the community, often rarely seen through in-person visits.  The typical means of assuring patient-centered approaches may be overlooked or inappropriate for assessing the patient experience in telehealth or online venues.  The HealthyLifetimeTM is a community-based, virtual nurse health coaching program for adults with one or more chronic diseases or risk factors.  Our quality assurance program will be described, including an assessment of nurse competency using our six strategies, patient-centeredness and personalized approach to coaching, the quality and completeness of core program activities, and patient outcomes and satisfaction with the program.  We use a patient case study to describe the program's phases and quality assurance process.  While patient satisfaction is an indicator of experience, the quality of the nurse-patient communication dynamic as it relates to the patient’s evolving behavior change and outcome achievement is a critical factor. We developed and validated natural language analysis methods, the Nurse Health Coaching Assessment, to assess the nurse’s use of our six strategies and the patient’s cognitive-behavioral responses – the Indicators of Health Behavior Change – which, combined, assess the quality of nurse-patient communication dynamic.  The case illustrates how the program's total quality assurance approach impacts the nurse’s notes, core program elements, and patient outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the cost and value of the program.

Article Details

How to Cite
ADAMCZYK, Mary Ann et al. Assuring the Quality of Patient Experience and Outcomes in All-Virtual Nurse Telehealth Programs: A Case Report Illustration. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 5, may 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 19 june 2024. doi:
Case Reports


1. Shaver J. The state of telehealth before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2022;49:517-530.
2. Bhaskar S, Bradley S, Chattu VK, Adisesh A, Nurtazina A, Kyrykbayeva S, Sakhamuri S, Yaya S, Sunil T, Thomas P. Telemedicine across the globe-position paper from the COVID-19 pandemic health system resilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) international consortium (Part 1). Frontiers in public health. 2020;8:556720.
3. Walley D, McCombe G, Broughan J, O’Shea C, Crowley D, Quinlan D, Wann C, Crowley T, Cullen W. Use of telemedicine in general practice in Europe since the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review of patient and practitioner perspectives. PLOS Digital Health. 2024;3:e0000427.
4. ACHIAGA MDMN. The rise of digital health technologies during the pandemic. 2021.
5. Valdes D, Alqazlan L, Procter R, Dale J. Global evidence on the rapid adoption of telemedicine in primary care during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol. Systematic reviews. 2022;11:124.
6. Duncan LJ, Cheng KF. Public perception of NHS general practice during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. F1000Research. 2021;10.
7. Hays RD, Skootsky SA. Patient experience with in-person and telehealth visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large integrated health system in the United States. Journal of general internal medicine. 2022;37:847-852.
8. Khoong EC, Sharma AE, Gupta K, Adler-Milstein J, Sarkar U. The abrupt expansion of ambulatory telemedicine: implications for patient safety. Journal of general internal medicine. 2022;37:1270-1274.
9. Lohr K. Committee to design a strategy for quality review and assurance. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance. 1990;1.
10. Potempa K, Calarco M, Flaherty-Robb M, Butterworth S, Marriott D, Potempa S, Laughlin C, Schmidt P, Struble L, Harden K. A randomized trial of a theory-driven model of health coaching for older adults: short-term and sustained outcomes. BMC Primary Care. 2023;24:205.
11. Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. The New England journal of medicine. 2013.
12. Butterworth S, Potempa S, Laughlin C, Flaherty-Robb M, Calarco M, Harden K, Schmidt P, Furspan P, Potempa K. Case Studies: Person-Centered Health Coaching in People With Negative Social Determinants of Health. AJPM focus. 2023;2:100109.
13. Street Jr RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient education and counseling. 2009;74:295-301.
14. Potempa K, Butterworth S, Flaherty-Robb M, Calarco M, Marriott D, Ghosh B, Gabarda A, Windsor J, Potempa S, Laughlin C. The Impact of Nurse Health-Coaching Strategies on Cognitive—Behavioral Outcomes in Older Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;20:416.
15. Brennan TA, Horwitz RI, Duffy FD, Cassel CK, Goode LD, Lipner RS. The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement. Jama. 2004;292:1038-1043.
16. UC San Diego PACE Program's Clinical Competency Assessment 24024; Accessed April 3.
17. Are competency assessments and performance evaluations the same or two different requirements? 2016: Accessed April 4.
18. Hess BJ, Weng W, Holmboe ES, Lipner RS. The association between physicians' cognitive skills and quality of diabetes care. Academic medicine. 2012;87:157-163.
19. Dauphinee WD. Educators must consider patient outcomes when assessing the impact of clinical training. Medical Education. 2012;46:13-20.
20. McHugh MD, Lake ET. Understanding clinical expertise: nurse education, experience, and the hospital context. Research in nursing & health. 2010;33:276-287.
21. Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT. To err is human: building a safer health system. 2000.
22. Salles G. Importance of quality corrective actions in business management.,and%20optimization%20of%20internal%20processes. Accessed May 4, 2024.
23. Yardley L, Morrison L, Bradbury K, Muller I. The person-based approach to intervention development: application to digital health-related behavior change interventions. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17:e4055.
24. Garzonis K, Mann E, Wyrzykowska A, Kanellakis P. Improving patient outcomes: effectively training healthcare staff in psychological practice skills: a mixed systematic literature review. Europe's journal of psychology. 2015;11:535.
25. Kissam SM, Beil H, Cousart C, Greenwald LM, Lloyd JT. States encouraging value‐based payment: lessons from CMS's State Innovation Models Initiative. The Milbank Quarterly. 2019;97:506-542.
26. Reed M. Examining Barriers to Expanding Innovative, Value-Based Care in Medicare. In; 2018;
27. Etchells E, Ho M, Shojania K. Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016;25:202-206.
28. Casalino LP, Gans D, Weber R, Cea M, Tuchovsky A, Bishop TF, Miranda Y, Frankel BA, Ziehler KB, Wong MM. US physician practices spend more than $15.4 billion annually to report quality measures. Health Affairs. 2016;35:401-406.