Medical Mobile Application for The Management of Heart-Lung Machine during Cardiac Surgery
Main Article Content
Abstract
The goal of this work is to construct a mobile application device that has a wide variety of functions which has clinical planning and decision making for heart-lung machine controlling and to assess the users’ level of satisfaction. The app was constructed according to the steps of design, algorithm, and validation, which is based on the ionic framework. The levels of satisfaction with the developed mobile app among 20 perfusionists were assessed by a questionnaire. The project researchers have officially assigned this medical mobile application with the name is Perfusion Assistant app. that can be accessed and used effectively cross platform on iOS and Android. The application is comprised of 5 main categories which includes: a perfusion calculator, myocardial protection chart, drugs details, priming solution, and parameters values. This finding shown that all cardiovascular parameters did not significant differ from Perfusion Assistant app. when compared to manual calculation. User’s satisfaction was at 3.64 ± 0.76 in the first evaluation. After modification with feedback from experts, the satisfaction of this application was evaluated with a 4.13 ± 0.56. Thereby, Perfusion Assistant app. is an application designed in clinical planning and decision of heart-lung machine controlling for perfusionists and medical staff that work in an opened heart surgery arena. Perfusion Assistant app. offers a variety of calculations related to cardiopulmonary bypass including blood flow rate, systemic vascular resistant, priming volume, and predicted hematocrit. Furthermore, Perfusion Assistant app. provides a quick, easy access, and real-time application for cardiopulmonary bypass that user’s satisfaction was a good level.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Stammers AH, Mongero LB, Tesdahl EA, Coley T. Does standardizing extracorporeal circuit design for cardiopulmonary bypass affect outcomes? Results from a national perfusion registry. JECT. 2019; 51:210.
3. Krishnamoorthy B. Cardiothoracic Manual for Perioperative Practitioners: M&K Update Ltd; 2020.
4. Machin D, Allsager C. Principles of cardiopulmonary bypass. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain. 2006; 6:176-81.
5. Kam P, Hines L, O'Connor E. Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on systemic vascular resistance. Perfusion. 1996; 11:346-50.
6. Santambrogio L, Leva C, Musazzi G, Bruno P, Vailati A, Zecchillo F, et al. Determination of pump flow rate during cardiopulmonary bypass in obese patients avoiding hemodilution. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2009; 24:245-9.
7. Eapen ZJ, Turakhia MP, McConnell MV, Graham G, Dunn P, Tiner C, et al. Defining a mobile health roadmap for cardiovascular health and disease. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016; 5:e003119.
8. Beatty AL, Fukuoka Y, Whooley MA. Using mobile technology for cardiac rehabilitation: a review and framework for development and evaluation. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2013; 2:e000568.
9. Luna-Perejon F, Malwade S, Styliadis C, Civit J, Cascado-Caballero D, Konstantinidis E, et al. Evaluation of user satisfaction and usability of a mobile app for smoking cessation. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2019; 182:105042.
10. Krittanawong C, Zhang H, Wang Z, Aydar M, Kitai T. Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017; 69:2657-64.
11. Athilingam P, Jenkins BA, Zumpano H, Labrador MA. Mobile technology to improve heart failure outcomes: A proof of concept paper. Applied Nursing Research. 2018; 39:26-33.
12. Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2012; 12:1-11.
13. O'Connor P, Byrne D, Butt M, Offiah G, Lydon S, Mc Inerney K, et al. Interns and their smartphones: use for clinical practice. Postgraduate medical journal. 2014; 90:75-9.
14. Hardyman W, Bullock A, Brown A, Carter-Ingram S, Stacey M. Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation. BMC medical education. 2013; 13:1-10.
15. Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2014; 102:22.
16. Murphy GS, Hessel EA, Groom RC. Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence-based approach. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2009; 108:1394-417.
17. Waranashiwar J, Ukey M. Ionic framework with angular for hybrid app development. International Journal of New Technology and Research. 2018; 4:263068.
18. Sanjay O, Devnath A, Thejas B. Arterial blood gas management during cardiopulmonary bypass. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry. 2005; 20:98-102.
19. Mosteller R. Simplified calculation of body surface area. New Engl J Med. 1987; 317:1098.
20. Koprivanac M, Aly A, Magruder J, Acker A, Grim J, Acker M, et al. Does Cardiopulmonary Bypass Provide Adequate End-Organ Perfusion? Circulation. 2020; 142(Suppl_3):A17170-A.
21. Lee Y-s, Kim WY, Yoo JW, Jung HD, Min TJ. Correlation between regional tissue perfusion saturation and lactate level during cardiopulmonary bypass. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2018; 71:361-7.
22. Hensley FA, Martin DE, Gravlee GP. A practical approach to cardiac anesthesia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
23. Birnbaum D, Philipp A, Kaluza M, Detterbeck M. On the way to an automatic heart-lung machine: a control system for oxygen tension in the oxygenator. Biomedizinische Technik Biomedical engineering. 1997; 42:313-4.
24. Toomasian JM. Is it time to automate the heart lung machine?. Perfusion; 2021. p. 545-6.