A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Refractive Error and Ocular Biometry among Young Adults in Brazil

Main Article Content

Celso Marcelo Cunha Giovanna Marchezine Jessica Teixeira Cunha Guilherme Morais Baracat de Lima Ingrid Martins Monteiro da Silva João Marcelo Vedoin Rosa Mariana Madrona Ribeiro Matheus Bittencourt Novaes Vinicius Dal Ponte Carvalho José Eduardo de Aguilar Nascimento Rafael Iribarren

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of myopia is increasing worldwide. Several studies were reported about myopia progression in the adult population with a high level of education.


Objective: To investigate the changes in refractive errors, biometric measurements, and environmental variables among medical university students during two years in Brazil.


Methods: A two-year longitudinal prospective study was proposed. Cycloplegic refractive examinations were conducted, and corneal topography and ocular optical biometry. The lens power was calculated by Bennett and Rozema’s formula. A questionnaire on lifestyle visual activities was applied. Only participants with normal ophthalmological exams were included in the study. Statistical significance was assessed at the level of 0.05.


Results:  One hundred twenty-eight students were eligible for the first exams and 89 (69.53%) completed the two-year follow-up. The mean age at baseline was 21.00 ± 1.92 years. Thirty-seven (41.57%) participants were males. Regarding refractive errors, 11 (12.36%) were hyperopic, 28 (31.46%) were emmetropic, 45 (50.56%) were myopic, and 5 (5.61%) were high myopic. There was a positive correlation between refraction and axial length in all groups, and a negative correlation with lens power. No significant two-year change in Km was found in all groups. The average of hours per day spent in outdoor and near-work activities were 1.36 ± 0.8 and 8.66 ± 1.77 h, respectively.


Conclusion: The results showed that the main correlation to change in refraction was axial length. There were some cases of myopia progression in myopic students. The contribution of crystalline lens power for keeping slow myopia progression was significant.  

Keywords: Refractive Errors, Myopia, Axial Length, Ocular Biometry, Cycloplegic Refraction

Article Details

How to Cite
CUNHA, Celso Marcelo et al. A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Refractive Error and Ocular Biometry among Young Adults in Brazil. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 7, july 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5494>. Date accessed: 05 aug. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i7.5494.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Duke-Elder S. Practice of refraction, 9th revised by: D Abrams Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1978, p. 29.
2. World Health Organization - Brien Holden Vision Institute. The impact of myopia. In: The Impact of Myopia and High Myopia. Report of the Joint World Health Organization– Brien Holden Vision Institute Global Scientific Meeting on Myopia. 2016. p. 1-29.
3. Ueda E, Yasuda M, Fujiwara K, et al. Five-Year Incidence of Myopic Maculopathy in a General Japanese Population.The Hisayama Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020.138;(8):887-893.
4. Kim HK, Kim SS. Factors associated with axial length elongation in high myopia in adults. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(8):1231-1236.
5. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Sheridan M, Stone J, Leary GA. Refraction and its components during the growth of the eye from the age of three. Memo Medl Res Counc. 1961;301(Special):1–67.
6. Larsen JS. The sagittal growth of the eye. IV. Ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol(Copenh). 1971;49:873–886.
7. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Burr D, Moeschberger ML. Normal eye growth in emmetropic schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:819-828.
8. Gifford KL, Richdale K, Kang P, et al. IMI – Clinical Management Guidelines Report. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60:M184-M203.
9. Hussin HM, Spry PGD, Majid MA, Gouws P. Reliability and validity of the partial coherence interferometry for measurement of ocular axial length in children. Eye. 2006;20(9):1021-1024.
10. Shih YF, Chiang TH, Lin LK. Lens thickness changes among schoolchildren in Taiwan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(6)2637-2644.
11. Jones LA, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, et al. Comparison of Ocular Component Growth Curves among Refractive Error Groups in Children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2317-2327.
12. Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Vingerling JR, et al. Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3): 301-309.
13. Grosvenor T, Scott R. Three-year changes in refraction and its components in youth-onset and early adult-onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(8):677-683.
14. Ducloux A, Marillet S, Ingrand P, Bullimore MA, Bourne RPA, Loveziel N. Progression of myopia in teenagers and adults: a nationwide longitudinal study of a prevalent cohort. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023;107(5):644-649.
15. Lee SSY, Lingham G, Sanfilippo PG, et al. Incidence and Progression of Myopia in Early Adulthood. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140(2):162-169.
16. Jacobsen N, Jensen H, Goldschmidt E. Does the Level of Physical Activity in University Students Influence Development and Progression of Myopia? A 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1322–1327.
17. Xiong S, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath T, et al. Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(6):551-566.
18. Wu PC, Chen CT, Lin KK, et al. Myopia Prevention and Outdoor Light Intensity in a School-Based Cluster Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(8): 1239-1250.
19. Li S, Li H, Liu L, et al. Time Outdoors and Myopia Progression Over 2 Years in Chinese Children: The Anyang Childhood Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:4734-4740.
20. Malavé VB, Zamora JG, Gándara E, et al. A Cross-Sectional Observational Study of the Relationship between Outdoor Exposure and Myopia in University Students, Measured by Conjunctival Ultraviolet Autofluorescence (CUVAF). J Clin Med. 2022;11:4264.
21. Dutheil F, Oueslati T, Delamarre L, et al. Myopia and Near Work: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(1):875.
22. Huang HM, Chang DST, Wu PC. The Association between Near Work Activities and Myopia in Children—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLos ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140419.
23. Williams KM, Bertelsen G, Cumberland F, et al. Increasing Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1489-1497.
24. Mountjoy E, Davies N, Plotnikov D, et al. Education and myopia: a Mendelian randomisation study. BMJ. 2018;361:k2022.
25. Au Eong KG, Tay TH, Lim MK. Education and myopia in 110,236 young Singaporean males. Singap Med J. 1993;34:489–92.
26. Rozema JJ, Atchison DA, Tassignon MJ. Comparing methods to estimate the human lens power. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(11):7937-7942.
27. Hagen LA, Gilson SJ, Akram MN, Baraas RC. Emmetropia Is Maintained Despite Continued Eye Growth From 16 to 18 Years of Age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:4178-4186.
28. Bai X, Jin N, Wang Q, et al. Development pattern of ocular biometric parameters and refractive error in young Chinese adults: a longitudinal study of first-year university students. BMC Opthalmol. 2022;22:220.
29. Bennett AG. A method of determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1988;8(1):53-59.
30. Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G, Rystad J. Biometric changes in the eyes of Norwegian university students – A three-year longitudinal study. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 1999;77:648-652.
31. Jorge J, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Refractive, biometric and topographic changes among Portuguese university science students: a 3-year longitudinal study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(3):287-294.
32. Zhang Y, Su M, Sun Y, et al. Clouclip combined with a questionnaire on the influence factors of myopia in children. Front Pediatr. 2023;7:11:1228257.2023.
33. Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;47:86-106.
34. Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, et al. IMI – Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M20-M30.
35. Bikbov MM, Gilmanshin TR, Kazakbaeva GM, et al. Prevalence of Myopic Maculopathy Among Adults in a Russian Population. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(3):e200567.
36. Kim HK, Kim SS. Factors associated with axial length elongation in high myopia in adults. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(8):1231-1236.
37. Annechien E G, Haarman C A, Enthoven J, et al. The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(4):49.
38. Saw SM, Matsumura S, Hoang QV. Prevention and Management of Myopia and Myopic Pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(2):488-499.