Is Induced Abortion Evidence-Based Medical Practice?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Leaders of medical schools and health professional associations in the United States have affirmed their commitment to induced abortion by persistently asserting that the procedure is evidence-based medical practice. There is an objective structured process by which the status of “evidence-based” is attained. It requires a detailed description and documentation of the patient’s disease, illness or condition; an explanation for how the treatment intervention ameliorates the problem; the outcomes by which the effectiveness of the treatment is measured; and the comparison of the treatment with other alternative interventions available. We provide historical context which indicates that staunch abortion advocate thought leaders considered the right to abortion on demand to be inconsistent with the concept of evidence-based practice. We summarize the research on the reasons why women choose abortion, and we review the questions, designs and findings available in the relevant Cochrane Library systematic reviews. Our conclusion is that the quality of abortion science in general is quite weak, that the data necessary for valid research is scarce, and that the claims of evidence-based induced abortion are unsupported by the existing body of published knowledge.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
II. Hub Staff Report. Johns Hopkins deans respond to historic decision that overturned 'Roe'. The Hub. June 27, 2022. Accessed December 11, 2023. https://hub.jhu.edu/2022/06/27/deans-respond-to-roe-reversal/
III. Beuter R. Abortion: an evidence-based perspective. George Washington University Himmelfarb Library News. July 16, 2022. Accessed December 11, 2023.
IV. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Physicians for Reproductive Health. Abortion can be medically necessary. ACOG. September 25, 2019. Accessed December 11, 2023. https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2019/09/abortion-can-be-medically-necessary
V. Watson K. Why we should stop using the term “elective abortion.” AMA J Ethics. 2018;20(12):E1175-1180. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2018.1175.
VI. Kendal E. All abortions are medically necessary. Clinical Ethics. 2023;18(3):306-311. doi:10.1177/14777509231166530
VII. Smith BEY, Bartz D, Goldberg AB, Janiak E. "Without any indication": stigma and a hidden curriculum within medical students' discussion of elective abortion. Soc Sci Med. 2018;214:26-34. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.014
VIII. Akobeng AK. Principles of evidence based medicine. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(8):837-840. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.071761
IX. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305-310. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171
X. Mechanic D. Bringing science to medicine: the origins of evidence-based practice. Health Affairs. 1998;17(6):250-251. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.17.6.250
XI. Longbons T. Fact sheet: reasons for abortion. Charlotte Lozier Institute. January 14, 2023. Accessed December 11, 2023. https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-reasons-for-abortion/
XII. Longbons T, Steupert MA. Fact sheet: abortions at 15 weeks in the United States. Charlotte Lozier Institute. January 12, 2023. Accessed December 14, 2023. https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-abortions-at-15-weeks-in-the-united-states/
XIII. Biggs MA, Gould H, Foster DG. Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. BMC Womens Health. 2013;13:29. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-13-29
XIV. Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005;37(3):110-118. doi:10.1363/psrh.37.110.05
XV. Nathanson BN. The abortion cocktail. First Things. 1996;59:23-26. https://www.firstthings.com/article/1996/01/the-abortion-cocktail
XVI. Cates W Jr., Grimes DA, Smith JC. Abortion as a treatment for unwanted pregnancy: The number two sexually transmitted condition. Adv Planned Parenthood. 1977;12:115-121.
XVII. Hardin G, Lassoe JVP Jr., Callahan D, et al. Abortion and morality: The relationship between available abortion and sexual freedom. In: Hall RE, ed. Abortion in a Changing World. Vol 2. Columbia University Press; 1970:106-111.
XVIII. Lohr PA, Hayes JL, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD006714. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006714.pub2
XIX. Gambir K, Kim C, Necastro KA, Ganatra B, Ngo TD. Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3(3):CD013181. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2
XX. Barnard S, Kim C, Park MH, Ngo TD. Doctors or mid-level providers for abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(7):CD011242. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011242.pub2
XXI. Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Misoprostol for induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second or third trimester for women with a fetal anomaly or after intrauterine fetal death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(4):CD004901. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004901.pub2.
XXII. Kortsmit K, Nguyen AT, Mandel MG, et al. Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023;72(9):1-29. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1
XXIII. Fact sheet: risks and complications of chemical abortion. Charlotte Lozier Institute. August 23, 2023. Accessed December 19, 2023. https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-risks-and-complications-of-chemical-abortion/
XXIV. Will medical staff be able to notice that I am having an abortion? Safe2Choose. Accessed December 11, 2023. https://safe2choose.org/faq/medical-abortion-faq/during-abortion-with-pills/will-medical-staff-be-able-to-notice-that-i-am-having-an-abortion
XXV. Hausknecht RU. Methotrexate and misoprostol to terminate early pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(9):537-540. doi:10.1056/NEJM199508313330901
XXVI. Asija N. Dr. Archie Cochrane: a guiding light in epidemiology and evidence-based medicine. Journey of a Non-Clinical Doctor. February 23, 2022. Accessed December 11, 2023. https://www.journeyofanonclinicaldoctor.com/2022/02/Archie-Cochrane-EBM.html