Applying a Multi-Sectoral Approach for Programming of Health Interventions: Comparative Analysis of Nutrition and Tobacco Control Amongst Adolescents in Pakistan
Main Article Content
Abstract
Adolescent health is being increasingly featured in global policy discourse on sustainable development. Despite global calls for more joined up working across relevant sectors, there is less known on how to effectively co-opt other sectors for programming of globally recommended adolescent health measures.
This paper aimed to assess multisector programming of nutrition versus tobacco control interventions for adolescents in Pakistan from a political economy lens. Both nutrition programming and tobacco control rely on multi-sectoral programming and are one of the foremost areas for adolescent health needs in Pakistan. Data was drawn from 84 key informant interviews across government stakeholders, development partners, civil society organizations, experts and youth groups, review of policy and programming resources and published literature. The study scope was confined to exploring the pathway of programming and early implementation does not extend to evaluation of implementations. Existing frameworks of multi-sector governance were adapted and progress was assessed against i) issue framing, ii) stakeholder coalitions, iii) resourcing and iv) coordination platforms, to understand challenges and opportunities for an effective multi-sector response.
Our analysis found important commonalities as well as differences across both nutrition and tobacco control programming in Pakistan. First, adolescents had a weak constituency within nutrition efforts confined to under-nutrition interventions for reproductive health and a gendered nuancing overlooking needs of boys but have featured historically in national Tobacco control frameworks. Second, lack of framing of social-behavioural perspectives in national response was commonly seen for both adolescent Nutrition as well as Tobacco Control constraining coalitions with new stakeholder groups such as youth initiatives, local government, sports, education, and entertainment that are necessary for lifestyle changes in adolescents. Third, Nutrition had opportune multi-sector platforms of the SUN networks available for programming whereas Tobacco Control situated within the health ministry struggled with mandate to steer multi-sector programming and unlock resources held by other sectors. Fourth, we found that horizontal coordination across sectors itself requires dedicated resourcing and capacity which was overlooked.
The Pakistan case study adds to contextual insights on success and failure of multisector governance for nutrition providing an analytical contrast with a similar multi-sector issue of tobacco control. We conclude that the process of how multi-sector programming for adolescent nutrition is brought about within countries is equally important as the prescriptive content of globally advocated interventions. We also identified key elements of a pathway to more effective programming that include attention to i) inclusive framing for its domino effect on coalition building, ii) ensuring diversity within core coalitions; iii) an organisational home outside the health sector for programming across sectors; iv) dedicated resourcing for impactful coordination and oversight of multi-sector programming.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. WHO 2017. Global Accelerated Action for the Health of Adolescents (AA-HA!): guidance to support country implementation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/255415/9?sequence=1
3. Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, Arora M, Azzopardi P, Baldwin W, Bonell C, Kakuma R. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. The Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1
4. George A, Jacobs T, Ved R, Jacobs T, Rasanathan K, Zaidi SA. Adolescent health in the Sustainable Development Goal era: are we aligned for multisectoral action? BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e004448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004448
5. GoP 2023. Announcement Of Results Of 7th Population And Housing Census-2023 ‘The Digital Census.’ Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/population/2023/Press%20Release.pdf
6. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN). Pakistan: New Adolescent Nutrition Strategy boosts engagement with all stakeholders. 2020. Available from: Pakistan: New Adolescent Nutrition Strategy boosts engagement with all stakeholders (gainhealth.org)
7. WHO 2023. UHC service coverage index - South Asia. Global Health Observatory. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/service-coverage
8. World Bank 2022. School enrollment, primary (% gross) - South Asia. World Bank Data. 2022. [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: School enrollment, primary (% gross) - South Asia | Data (worldbank.org)
9. Pakistan National Nutrition Survey 2018: Key Findings Report. UNICEF: Islamabad, Pakistan. 2018. [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: Final Key Findings Report 2019.pdf (unicef.org)
10. Pakistan Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS). World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: www.emro.who.int/images/stories/tfi/documents/GYTS_FS_PAK_2013.pdf?ua=1.
11. Social Policy and Development Centre (SPDC). Implications of Cigarette Taxation in Pakistan: An Exploration Through a CGE Model.2021. Available from: Social-Policy-and-Development-Centre-Karachi-ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS-OF-CIGARETTE-TAXATION-IN-PAKISTAN-An-Exploration-through-A-CGE-Model.pdf (researchgate.net)
12. Zaidi S, Bhutta ZA, Mohmand SK, Acosta AM. The political economy of undernutrition national report: Pakistan.2013. Available from: http://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_chs_chs/194
13. Zaidi SA, Bigdeli M, Langlois EV, Riaz A, Orr DW, Idrees N, Bump JB. Health systems changes after decentralisation: progress, challenges and dynamics in Pakistan. BMJ global health. 2019 Jan 1;4(1):e001013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001013
14. Rasanathan K, Bennett S, Atkins V, Beschel R, Carrasquilla G, Charles J, Dasgupta R, Emerson K, Glandon D, Kanchanachitra C, Kingsley P. Governing multisectoral action for health in low-and middle-income countries. PLoS medicine. 2017 Apr 25;14(4):e1002285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002285
15. Acosta AM, Fanzo J. Fighting maternal and child malnutrition: analysing the political and institutional determinants of delivering a national multisectoral response in six countries. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. 2012 Apr. Available from: DFID_ANG_Synthesis_April2012.pdf (publishing.service.gov.uk)
16. Government of Pakistan. Pakistan Adolescent Nutrition Strategy, Ministry of National Health Services, Coordination and Regulation. https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/media/2846/file/Pakistan%20Adolescent%20Nutrition%20Strategy.pdf
17. Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health policy and planning. 1994 Dec 1;9(4):353-70.https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/9.4.353
18. Masud, H; Gill, P; Sekalala, S; Oyebode, O. Tracking progress of tobacco control in Pakistan against the MPOWER package of interventions: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases 5(1):p 16-21, Jan–Mar 2020. https://doi.org/10.4103/jncd.jncd_42_19
19. Habib SS, Najmi R, Iqbal MA, Sabir M, Zaidi S. The need for taxation to reduce tobacco affordability in Pakistan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2023 Sep 1;27(9):706-708. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0074 PMID: 37608485; PMCID: PMC10443786.
20. Zaidi, S., Mohmand, S.K., Hayat, N., Acosta, A.M. and Bhutta, Z.A. (2013), Nutrition Policy in the Post-devolution Context in Pakistan: An Analysis of Provincial Opportunities and Barriers†. IDS Bulletin, 44: 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-5436.12035
21. Khan J 2008. Tobacco Control: Current Challenges for Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Chest Medicine, 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20170423053420id_/http://www.pjcm.net:80/index.php/pjcm/article/viewFile/185/176
22. Tobacco Control Cell (TCC). Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination.http://www.tcc.gov.pk/about_us.php
23. Zaidi S, Bhutta Z, Hussain SS, Rasanathan K. Multisector governance for nutrition and early childhood development: overlapping agendas and differing progress in Pakistan. BMJ global health. 2018 Oct 1;3(Suppl 4):e000678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000678
24. Khan, J. A., Amir Humza Sohail, A. M., Arif Maan, M. A. (2016). Tobacco control laws in Pakistan and their implementation: A pilot study in Karachi. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 66(7), 875-879. https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_med_pulm_critcare/124
25. Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Gervais S, et al. Nutrition agenda setting, policy formulation and implementation: lessons from the mainstreaming nutrition initiative. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(1): 19‐31. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr011
26. Graham WJ, Kuruvilla S, Hinton R, Veitch E, Simpson PJ. Multisectoral collaboration for health and sustainable development. BMJ. 2018 Dec 7; 363:k4868. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr011 PMID: 30530466; PMCID: PMC6282722
27. Shiffman J, Shawar YR. Framing and the formation of global health priorities. Lancet. 2022 May 21;39 9(10339):1977-1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00584-0. Epub 2022 May 17. PMID: 35594874.
28. Jacobs T, George A, De Jong M. Policy foundations for transformation: a gender analysis of adolescent health policy documents in South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 3;36(5):684-694. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab041. PMI D: 33852727; PMCID: PMC8248976.
29. Roy K, Shinde S, Sarkar BK, Malik K, Parikh R, Patel V. India's response to adolescent mental health: a policy review and stakeholder analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;54 (4):405-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1647-2. Epub 2019 Jan 3. PMID: 30607452; PMCID: PMC6443608
30. Akwara E, Idele P. The moral and social narratives of sexual and reproductive health in Kenya: a case of adolescents and young people pre- and within the MDG era. Reprod Health. 2020 May 26;17(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00930-x. PMID: 32456657; PMCID: PMC7249422
31. Mirza Z, Munir D, Conflicting interests, institutional fragmentation and opportunity structures: an analysis of political institutions and the health taxes regime in Pakistan, BMJ Global Health 2023;8:e012045. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012045
32. Nimubona A. Health diplomacy to promote multisectoral participation in fighting against fragmentation and increasing budget for internalization of the health financing progress matrix in Burundi. Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00376-w. PMI D: 35653044; PMCID: PMC9161612
33. Gaihre S, Kyle J, Semple S, Smith J, Marais D, Subedi M, Morgan H. Bridging barriers to advance multisector approaches to improve food security, nutrition and population health in Nepal: transdisciplinary perspectives. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7204-4. PMID: 31319837; PMCID: PMC6637542.
34. Bennett S, Glandon D, Rasanathan K. Governing multisectoral action for health in low-income and middle-income countries: unpacking the problem and rising to the challenge. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 10;3(Suppl 4):e000880. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000880. PMID: 30364411; PMCID: PMC6195144