↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background: LVEF is a reli­able diagnostic and prognostic value in coronary artery disease. Several modalities in­cluding ECHO, GSPECT, cMRI and RNV can assess the LVEF. Filtering contributes to the variation of LVEF with influence on spatial resolution and statistical noise in the reconstructed images. The authors investigated the impact of Wiener and Butterworth filters variation for accuracy of LVEFs in CAD pts.

Methods: Scans of 21 patients; 14 males and 7 females, 25-76 years old, with suspected CAD who underwent the 99mTc Myoview GSPECT using QPS and QGS were reconstructed with Winer filter based on the outcome of an earlier SPECT-CT optimisation of two chest phantoms. The patient results compared to the previous reports using a standard Butterworth filter and the ECHO for comparison.

Results: 47%, 29% and 24% of pts reported normal, equivocal (EV) and having CAD based on LVEF respectively and prior to modified filtering. A good correlation between ECHO and the calculated LVEF with Winer and Butterworth (r2= 0.876 & r2=0.847) and for small heart (r2= 0.951 & r2=0.933) was observed. To achieve less variation in LVEF measurement, we established a mean cutoff value for Butterworth (0.26 +/-0.09) and a mean point value for Winer (4.9 +/-1.19) in correlation to ECHO. Patients with LVEF of <40 showed greater variation in points- setting for Winer, but less fluctuation in cutoff for Butterworth. No remarkable difference noticed for LVEF between two filter techniques for normal cases after adjusting parameters.

Conclusions: There was a good agreement between LVEF derived from GSPECT and ECHO after adjusting parameters with 10% higher accuracy in equivocal cases at this stage. Mean percentage LVEF error for Wiener and Butterworth against ECHO LVEF were 2% and 6% respectively post correction, together with more elevated qualitative acceptable images. The accuracy of intermediate CAD reporting for both rest and stress studies were elevated, though more patients’ images are needed to be assessed for equivocal and smaller size hearts to reach a more statically viable result.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 12 No 7 (2024): Vol 12 No 7 (2024): July issue
SectionResearch Articles
Published26 July 2024
DOI10.18103/mra.v12i7.5534
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

MM

Michael Masoomi, PhD, MRCP(Lon)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, ADAN Hospital, KUWAIT. ; Department of Research and Innovation, Portsmouth University Hospital, U.K.

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗