Learner Practice Gaps in Osteoporosis: Piloting a Metabolic Bone Disease Curriculum within a Fracture Liaison Service Framework

Main Article Content

Vaneet K Sandhu, MD Teodor Duro, MD Sareen Sandhu, DO Eugene Looi, MD Christina Downey, MD Karina Torralba, MD

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a disease increasing in prevalence and a growing public health concern. However, health care gaps in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis exist. One of the factors contributing to this observation may be that the disease does not receive significant attention particularly during internal medicine residency training. A curriculum was designed and implemented in a cohort of Loma Linda University internal medicine residents to address this issue. It consisted of a week-long rotation that allowed residents to enhance their knowledge of the recognition and management of osteoporosis through participating in an inpatient Fracture Liaison Service as well as attending osteoporosis conferences. A retrospective review of the osteoporosis management practices of residents who completed the curriculum was performed, with the objective of evaluating health care gaps among these residents and to inform educators about possible areas for curriculum improvement. Twenty-one internal medicine residents completed the MBD rotation during the designated period. Of those, 6, 9, and 6 were PGY 1, 2, and 3, respectively. 133 charts were reviewed for encounters occurring within 3 months of the MBD rotation completion. Residents who have completed the osteoporosis curriculum treated osteoporosis in 65.8% of patients who qualified, which is higher than the national average of 40% in the US, it less than an improvement than the authors expected. Itis the opinion of the authors that internal medicine residents should emphasize osteoporosis care more given the prevalence, morbidity and mortality of the disease. There is work to be done to create an effective curriculum for this disease during postgraduate medical training.

Keywords: Population health, Quality improvement, Fracture liaison service, Osteoporosis, Medical education

Article Details

How to Cite
SANDHU, Vaneet K et al. Learner Practice Gaps in Osteoporosis: Piloting a Metabolic Bone Disease Curriculum within a Fracture Liaison Service Framework. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 7, july 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5622>. Date accessed: 15 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i7.5622.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Bouxsein ML, Kaufman J, Tosi L, et al. Recommendations for optimal care of the fragility fracture patient to reduce the risk of future fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12(6):385-395.
2. Murphy-Menezes M. The osteoporosis clinical care gap: an opportunity for impact by the clinical pharmacist. Bone Rep Recommendations. 2016;2:1. Doi:10.4172/2469-6684.100017
3. Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(11):2520-2526. Doi:10.1002/jbmr.2269
4. McAdam-Marx C, Unni S, Ye X, Nelson S, Nickman NA. Effect of Medicare reimbursement reduction for imaging services on osteoporosis screening rates. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(3):511-516. Doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03837.x
5. Wysowski DK, Greene P. Trends in osteoporosis treatment with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates in the United States, 2002-2012. Bone. 2013;57(2):423-428.
6. Lewiecki EM, Wright NC, Curtis JR, et al. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015 [published correction appears in Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug 27;:]. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(3):717-722. Doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0
7. Boonen S, Autier P, Barette M, Vanderschueren D, Lips P, Haentjens P. Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(2):87-94. Doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1515-z
8. Browner WS, Pressman AR, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Mortality following fractures in older women. The study of osteoporotic fractures. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(14):1521-1525. Doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440130121011
9. Singer A, Exuzides A, Spangler L, et al. Burden of illness for osteoporotic fractures compared with other serious diseases among postmenopausal women in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(1):53-62.
10. French S, Choden S, Schmajuk G. Quality measures and quality improvement initiatives in osteoporosis-an update. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019;17(6):491-509. Doi:10.1007/s11914-019-00547-5
11. Yusuf AA, Matlon TJ, Grauer A, Barron R, Chandler D, Peng Y. Utilization of osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11(1):31. Doi:10.1007/s11657-016-0285-0
12. American Board of Internal Medicine. 2020 Internal Medicine Certification Examination Blueprint. Accessed electronically at:
13. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis-2020 Update Executive Summary. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(5):564-570.
14. Williams SA, Chastek B, Sundquist K, et al. Economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in US managed care enrollees. Am J Manag Care. 2020;26(5) Doi:10.37765/ajmc.2020.43156
15. Sisson SD, Dalal D. Internal medicine residency training on topics in ambulatory care: a status report. Am J Med. 2011;124:86-90.
16. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Rheumatology. 2020.
17. Hawtry K. Using experiential techniques. J Econ Educ. 2007;38(2):143-152.
18. Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(3):184-210. Doi:10.3322/caac.21557
19. Harvey NCW, McCloskey E, Mitchell PJ, et al. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28:1507-1529.
20. Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed VA. The Kirkpatrick model: a useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009;34(3):266-274. Doi:10.1080/13668250903093125
21. Crandall CJ, Hovey KM, Guo M, et al. Knowledge and needs of resident physicians regarding osteoporosis: a nationwide survey of residents. J Bone Miner Res Plus. 2021;5(8) Doi:10.1002/jbm4.10524
22. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121-1134. Doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
23. Nguyen B, Ackerman KE, Glover ME, et al. Osteoporosis: a small-group case-based learning activity. MedEdPORTAL. 2021;17:11176. Doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11176
24. Health Information Technology, Patient Safety, and Professional Nursing Care Documentation in Acute Care Settings. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Available at: https://ojin.nursingworld.org. Accessed June 14, 2024.
25. Joint Commission. Quick Safety Issue 10: Documentation and Reporting in Clinical Practice. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/newsletters/quick-safety-10-update-7-19-21.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2024.
26. HealthIT.gov. Clinical Decision Support: EHR Tipsheet. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/clinicaldecisionsupport_tipsheet.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2024.
27. Levitt EB, Sobel AD, Slabaugh W, et al. Barriers and resources to optimize bone health in orthopaedic education: Own the Bone (OTB): bone health education in residency. JBJS Open Access. 2021;6(4) Doi:10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00021