Reducing the Burden of Dementia by Using the Talking Mats® Framework to Help People with Dementia and their Carers Communicate More Effectively

Main Article Content

Joan Murphy, Ph.D.

Abstract

This paper considers how Talking Mats can reduce the burden of dementia by supporting communication for people with dementia and their carers.


Communication is the most fundamental requirement for human interaction. As dementia advances through the different stages of the illness, communication between the person with dementia and their carers becomes more challenging and can be the foremost problem and cause of distress both for the person with the diagnosis and for their carers.


Firstly, it discusses the importance, and defines the problem, of communication for people with dementia and their carers. It then describes Talking Mats, an innovative communication tool. The paper then outlines a seminal research project which determined how effective Talking Mats is for people at different stages of dementia. Additional Talking Mats projects are then summarised. They demonstrate how Talking Mats can help decision making and self-management for couples living with dementia and also how Talking Mats can be used positively by staff working with people with dementia in a long-stay hospital. Publications by other researchers are also referred to. Finally, this paper offers implications for clinical practice and policy.

Keywords: Dementia communication, Talking Mats®, Carer support, Dementia care, Decision-making in dementia, Self-management in dementia, Dementia and interpersonal communication, Communication tools for dementia, Dementia caregiving strategies, Clinical implications for dementia

Article Details

How to Cite
MURPHY, Joan. Reducing the Burden of Dementia by Using the Talking Mats® Framework to Help People with Dementia and their Carers Communicate More Effectively. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 9, sep. 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5716>. Date accessed: 21 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i9.5716.
Section
Review Articles

References

1. Dijkstra K, Bourgeois MS, Allen RS, Burgio LD. Conversational coherence: discourse analysis of older adults with and without dementia. J Neurolinguistics. 2004;17(4):263–83.

2. Bayles KA. Communication in dementia. In: H Ulatowska (Ed) The Aging Brain: Communication in the elderly. Boston: College Hill Press. 1985.

3. Kempler D. Language changes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. In R. Ubinski (Ed.), Dementia and communication. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group. 1995.

4. Cheston R, Bender M, Byatt S. Involving people who have dementia in the evaluation of services: A review. J Ment Health. 2000;9(5):471-479.

5. Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Open University Press, Buckingham. 1997.

6. Somme D. Participation et choix des résidents dans le processus d'entrée en institution. Dossiers Solidarité et Santé. 2003;1:35-47.

7. Tyrrell J, Genin N, Myslinski M. Freedom of choice and decision-making in health and social care: Views of older patients with early-stage dementia and their carers. Dementia: Int J Soc Res. 2006;5(4):479-502.

8. Murphy J. Enabling People with Motor Neurone Disease to Discuss their Quality of Life. Communication Matters. 1999;3(2):2-6.

9. Murphy J. Enabling people with aphasia to discuss quality of life. Br J Ther Rehabil. 2000;7 (11):454-457.

10. Cameron L, Murphy J. Enabling young people with a learning disability to make choices at a time of transition. Br J Learn Disabil. 2002;30:105-112.

11. Murphy J, McCallan S, Aitken J. Helping People make decisions about PEG feeding. Bulletin of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. 2003;618.

12. Murphy J, Tester S, Hubbard G, Downs M, MacDonald C. Enabling frail older people with a communication difficulty to express their views: the use of Talking Mats as an interview tool. Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(2):95-107.

13. World Health Organisation 2001, WHO-ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health World Health Organisation, Geneva.

14. Bornman J, Murphy J. Using the ICF in goal setting: clinical application using Talking Mats. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1(3):145-154.

15. Murphy J, Gray CM Cox S, van Achterberg T, Wyke S. The effectiveness of the Talking Mats framework with people with dementia. Dementia. 2010;9(4):454-472.

16. Carter M, Iacono T. Professional judgments of the intentionality of communicative acts. Augment Altern Commun. 2002;18(30):177-191).

17. Roulstone S. Consensus and variation between speech and language therapists in the assessment and selection of preschool children for intervention: A body of knowledge or idiosyncratic decisions? Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001;36 (3):329-346.

18. Ashton RH. A Review and analysis of research on the test-retest reliability of professional judgment. JBDM. 2000;13:277-194.

19. The Effectiveness Framework of Functional Communication https://www.talkingmats.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EFFC-2016.pdf

20. Murphy J, Oliver TM. The use of Talking Mats to support people with dementia and their carers to make decisions together. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21(2):171–180.

21. Bourgeois MS (1991) Communication treatment for adults with dementia. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:831–44.

22. Murphy J, Alexander J, McLinton A. Talking Mats: a model of communication training. The Journal of Dementia Care. 2016;24(5):22-25

23. Ferm U, Eckerholm Wallfur P, Gelfgren E, Hartelius L. Communication between Huntington’s Disease patients, their Support persons and the dental hygienist using Talking Mats. Huntington’s Disease — Core Concepts and Current Advances. 2012. DOI: 10.5772/31484

24. Hallberg L, Mellgren E, Hartelius L, Ferm, U. Talking Mats in a discussion group for people with Huntington's disease. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013; 8(1): 67–76

25. Pettit LK, Tönsing, Dada S. The perspectives of adults with aphasia and their team members regarding the importance of nine life areas for rehabilitation: a pilot investigation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016; doi:10.1080/10749357.2016.1207148.

26. Hagelskjær V, Krohn M, Christensen PS, Reffstrup Christensen J. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility. Occup Ther Int. 2019.doi: 10.1155/2019/9367315.

27. Stans, S.E.A., Dalemans, R.J.P., de Witte, LP. Using Talking Mats to support conversations with communication vulnerable people: A scoping review. Technol Disabil. 2019;30(4)153-176. doi: 10.3233/tad-180219

28. Human Rights Act 1998 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents

29. Mental Capacity Act England and Wales 2005 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents

30. Charter of patient rights and responsibilities https://www.gov.scot/publications/charter-patient-rights-responsibilities-revised-june-2022/

31. New Dementia Strategy Scotland: Everyone’s Story 2023 https://www.gov.scot/publications/new-dementia-strategy-scotland-everyones-story/