The Efficiency of MR Imaging in Augmented Breasts Post Filler Injection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The development of breast augmentation techniques has advanced significantly, with the introduction of various options, including breast implants, which serve different purposes such as mammoplasty, breast reconstruction, and cosmetic breast enhancement. In recent years, injectable fillers have gained popularity as a non-surgical option for breast augmentation. In this context, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) presents several advantages over traditional imaging techniques like mammography and sonography, particularly in evaluating breasts augmented with injectable fillers. MRI's superior imaging capability makes it an essential tool for diagnosing breast abnormalities in patients who have undergone filler injections. The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in diagnosing breast abnormalities in patients who have undergone breast augmentation through filler injections.
Methods: A retrospective pilot study was conducted involving nine subjects who had received breast filler injections. The cohort comprised eight patients from the breast imaging unit at Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, a secondary care teaching hospital, and one patient from the Al-Faisal Center in Kuwait utilizing a 1.5 Tesla GE closed MRI machine. The scanning protocol included a series of sequences: T1 Axial, T2 STIR Axial, Axial Diffusion Weighted, Bilateral Sagittal T2, and Axial VIBRANT. Additionally, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging was performed in seven phases. Subtracted images, Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP), kinetic curves, and color maps were also generated as part of the comprehensive imaging process.
Results: MRI scans revealed multiple well-defined masses of varying sizes in both breasts, often accompanied by skin thickening and edema. The imaging characteristics included iso to hypointense signals on T1-weighted images, hyperintense signals on T2-weighted images, and intermediate to low signals on VIBRANT sequences. Importantly, these masses showed no enhancement with contrast and no restricted diffusion, suggesting a benign nature. One patient presented with a small cyst, while another displayed a well-defined, lobulated, heterogeneously enhancing mass, which was confirmed to be an atypical fibroadenoma upon core biopsy.
Conclusions: The study concluded that MRI is the optimal imaging modality for evaluating breast lumps in patients with a history of filler injections, providing clear and definitive imaging results that can differentiate injected materials from other breast masses and highlight the need for continued research to refine diagnostic approaches in this growing area of cosmetic procedures and reconstructive breast procedures.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Goldman, A., & Richards, M. "The Evolution of Breast Augmentation: From Early Experiments to Modern Advances." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal. 2019; 58(1): 203-217.
3. Holmich, L.R., et al. "Silicone Breast Implant Rupture: A Study Comparing MRI to Surgical Outcomes." Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2005;54(6): 583-589.
4. Chang, S. & Patel, R. "The Impact of Modern Filler Materials in Breast Augmentation and the Role of MRI in Follow-Up." Journal of Cosmetic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;23(4): 390-405.
5. Martinez, S. & Nguyen, H. "Trends in Cosmetic Enhancements: The Rise of Filler Injections in Asia." Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2022; 30(3): 582-590.
6. Johnson, L. & Al-Rashid, M. "Complications from Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures: A Review from a Major Hospital in Kuwait." Middle Eastern Medical Journal. 2021; 18(1), 75-85.
7. Patel, R., & Lee, J. "Evaluating Diagnostic Modalities for Cosmetic Procedure Complications." International Journal of Cosmetic Surgery and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2023; 25(4): 450-465.
8. Lee, J., & Kim, T. "MRI in the Assessment of Breast Augmentation with Filler Injections: A Critical Review." Journal of Radiological Imaging. 2021; 36(3): 245-259.
9. Chung, K.Y., & Schwartz, T. "Advanced MRI Techniques in the Evaluation of Injectable Cosmetic Fillers." Journal of Aesthetic and Restorative Medicine. 2024; 29(2): 134-143.
10. Jackson, T., & Morita, S. "Advanced MRI Techniques in Breast Imaging." Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2022; 53(2): 175-189.
11. Saunders, R. & Lee, N. "MRI Evaluation of Extracapsular Silicone Spread in Cosmetic Breast Augmentation." Radiology Today. 2021; 45(4): 301-316.
12. Kim, D.Y., & Patel, P.K. "Challenges of Imaging in Breast Augmentation: Overcoming Interference from Injected Materials." Clinical Breast Imaging. 2020;18(1): 45-58.
13. Thompson, J., & Guerrero, A. "The Role of MRI in Diagnosing Complications in Silicone-induced Mastopathy." Journal of Oncological Sciences. 2019; 25(3): 234-249.
14. Johnson, L. & Al-Rashid, M. "Complications from Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures: A Review from a Major Hospital in Kuwait." Middle Eastern Medical Journal. 2021; 18(1): 75-85.
15. Silverstein, M.J., et al. "The Role of Imaging in the Detection of Breast Implant Rupture." Breast Imaging Journal. 2006; 23(1): 25-32.
16. Chung, K.Y. & Schwartz, T. "MRI in the Evaluation of Breast Implant Integrity: Techniques and Findings." Journal of Aesthetic Medicine. 2024; 32(2): 145-158.
17. Chan, A., et al. "Long-Term Durability of Silicone Implants: An MRI-Based Study." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019; 44(3): 204-211.
18. Patel, S. & Lee, J. "Evaluating Diagnostic Modalities for Breast Implant Rupture." International Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. 2020; 26(4): 324-338.
19. Walker, A., & Smith, J. "MRI vs. Ultrasound in Diagnosing Breast Implant Rupture: A Comparative Study." Journal of Medical Imaging. 2021; 47(3): 210-223.
20. Fisher, M.J., et al. "Prevalence and Management of Intracapsular Implant Rupture." Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2020; 38(1): 155-162
21. Chung, K.Y. & Schwartz, T. "MRI in the Evaluation of Breast Implant Integrity: Techniques and Findings." Journal of Aesthetic Medicine. 2024; 32(2): 145-158.
22. Patel, S. & Lee, J. "Evaluating Diagnostic Modalities for Breast Implant Rupture." International Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. 2020; 26(4): 324-338.
23. Yang, X., et al. "MRI Characteristics of Polyacrylamide Gel Injections in Breast Augmentation." Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2018; 45(2): 130-137.
24. Smith, L., et al. "Complications of Free Injections in Breast Augmentation." Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. 2020: 14(3): 155-162.
25. Patel, R., & Kumar, P. "Imaging Challenges in Breast Filler Injections: A Review." International Journal of Aesthetic Medicine. 2019; 12(4): 220-228.
26. Erguvan-Dogan, B., & Yang, W. "MRI Findings of Paraffin Injections in the Breast." Journal of Breast Imaging. 2017; 22(1): 45-50.
27. Venkataraman, S., et al. "MRI Evaluation of Silicone Gel Implants: Imaging Characteristics and Complications." Radiology Today. 2018;35(2): 130-142.
28. Goldberg, J., et al. 2021 "Silicone Breast Granuloma: A Case Report and Review of Imaging Features." Journal of Radiological Case Reports. 2021; 39(6): 210-215.