Patient Satisfaction with Telephone Follow-up after Lung Resection: Are we making the right ‘call’? Telephone Follow-up after Lung Resection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare institutions increased utilization of telemedicine. The impact of telemedicine on quality of care in a surgical setting is an under researched area of the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up after lung resection.
Methods: All lung cancer patients undergoing a post-operative telephone follow-up between April to November 2020 who had also previously completed at least one in-person pre-operative visit or follow-up were invited to participate. An anonymous online questionnaire adapted from the Telehealth Useability Questionnaire was circulated to participants. Our study’s primary outcome was patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up, compared with in-person visits before COVID-19. Secondary outcomes included surveying patients’ levels of concern about COVID-19, its perceived impact on their medical care, and their views on the utility of telemedicine post-pandemic.
Results: A total of 47 out of 54 patients completed the survey. Regarding COVID-19, 85% (39/46) of respondents were “somewhat” or “very” concerned about the pandemic in general and 76% (34/45) reported similar concerns about in-person healthcare appointments. There was no significant difference in participant comfort level and openness to telephone follow-ups before and after the actual encounter (p = 0.08). There was no significant difference reported between in-person and telephone appointments on all paired satisfaction questions directly comparing the two.
Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up after lung resection appears non-inferior to in-person appointments. The convenience of telemedicine for both patients and physicians may warrant sustained utilization of this modality of care post-pandemic.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 957-962. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067.
3. Chesnel C, Hentzen C, Le Breton F, et al. Efficiency and satisfaction with telephone consultation of follow-up patients in neuro-urology: Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurourol Urodyn 2021; 40: 929-937. 20210306. DOI: 10.1002/nau.24651.
4. Zhu C, Williamson J, Lin A, et al. Implications for Telemedicine for Surgery Patients After COVID-19: Survey of Patient and Provider Experiences. Am Surg 2020; 86: 907-915. 20200817. DOI: 10.1177/0003134820945196.
5. Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, et al. Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e24087. 20201201. DOI: 10.2196/24087.
6. Cerfolio RJ, Ferrari-Light D and Shah S. Telemedicine in thoracic surgery. Journal of Visualized Surgery 2019; 5.
7. Humer MF and Campling BG. The Role of Telemedicine in Providing Thoracic Oncology Care to Remote Areas of British Columbia. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19: 52. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0612-7.
8. Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, et al. Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 994-1000. 20110131. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.8315.
9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377-381. 20080930. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
10. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208. 20190509. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
11. Parmanto B, Lewis AN, Jr., Graham KM, et al. Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). Int J Telerehabil 2016; 8: 3-10. 20160701. DOI: 10.5195/ijt.2016.6196.
12. Viers BR, Lightner DJ, Rivera ME, et al. Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 2015; 68: 729-735. 20150418. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.002.
13. Dick PT, Filler R and Pavan A. Participant satisfaction and comfort with multidisciplinary pediatric telemedicine consultations. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 137-141; discussion 141-132. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90244-0.
14. Demiris G, Speedie S and Finkelstein S. A questionnaire for the assessment of patients' impressions of the risks and benefits of home telecare. J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6: 278-284. DOI: 10.1258/1357633001935914.
15. Newbould J, Abel G, Ball S, et al. Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 2017; 358: j4197. 20170927. DOI: 10.1136 /bmj.j4197.
16. Drerup B, Espenschied J, Wiedemer J, et al. Reduced No-Show Rates and Sustained Patient Satisfaction of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2021; 27: 1409-1415. 20210304. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0002.
17. Gunter RL, Chouinard S, Fernandes-Taylor S, et al. Current Use of Telemedicine for Post-Discharge Surgical Care: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222: 915-927. 20160213. DOI: 10.1016/j. jamcollsurg.2016.01.062.
18. Soegaard Ballester JM, Scott MF, Owei L, et al. Patient preference for time-saving telehealth postoperative visits after routine surgery in an urban setting. Surgery 2018; 163: 672-679. 201802 03. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.015.
19. Xiao K, Yeung JC and Bolger JC. The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49: 9-15. 20220909. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.037.