A Case-Controlled Retrospective Review of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients with Concomitant Burn and Trauma Injuries
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: While the resuscitation of either a burn or trauma patient is challenge, it is significantly complicated in a patient that has both severe burns and concomitant traumatic injuries. These patients represent a special subgroup that requires not only resuscitation of their burn injuries but also management of underlying traumatic injuries while avoiding complications of over resuscitation. The purpose of this study is to compare patients with concomitant burn and traumatic injuries to patients with isolated burn injuries to identify whether traditional burn resuscitation with crystalloid use leads to significant differences in morbidity and mortality.
Methods: This is case-control retrospective chart review of patients treated at the Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix AZ, from January 2014 to December 2019. Patients with concomitant burn and trauma injuries (Mixed) were matched with isolated burn patients (Burn) based on age, gender, TBSA, total injury severity score, burn injury severity score, and presence of inhalation injury. These groups were then compared to evaluate amount of crystalloid, colloid, and blood products received for the first 72 hours post injury. To determine the impact of fluid resuscitation, groups were then compared with respect to inpatient complications, ventilator days, ICU days, length of stay, and mortality.
Results: 133 patients were noted to have concomitant trauma and burn injuries during the allotted study period. 18 of these patients meet inclusion criteria and were subsequently matched with 18 isolated burn patients for total of 36 patients. Mixed group received more blood products during the first 24 hours of resuscitation (923.83 +1733.25 vs. 74.72 + 217.68, p value <0.05). Overall, mixed and burn patient groups received similar amounts of total fluid products. No significant differences were found when comparing inpatient complications or patient outcomes.
Conclusions: This study suggests that, while blood administration may play a role in concomitant trauma burn patients in first 24 hours of resuscitation, overall these patients require similar amounts of crystalloid and colloid products as burn with no increase in incidence of complications or adverse outcomes.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Gurney JM, Kozar RA, Cancio LC. Plasma for burn shock resuscitation: is it time to go back to the future? Transfusion. Apr 2019;59(S2):1578-1586.
3. Cartotto R, Johnson LS, Savetamal A, et al. American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on Burn Shock Resuscitation. Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. May 6 2024;45(3):565-589.
4. JM C, LA S, AP B, GW B, LC C. State of the art: an update on adult burn resuscitation. European Burn Journal 2.3 2021;2(3):152-167.
5. Cantle PM, Cotton BA. Balanced Resuscitation in Trauma Management. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2017;97(5):999-1014.
6. Jones DG, Nantais J, Rezende-Neto JB, Yazdani S, Vegas P, Rizoli S. Crystalloid resuscitation in trauma patients: deleterious effect of 5L or more in the first 24h. BMC Surg. Nov 6 2018;18(1):93.
7. Malone DL, Hess JR, Fingerhut A. Massive Transfusion Practices Around the Globe and a Suggestion for a Common Massive Transfusion Protocol. J of Trauma. 2006;60(6):S91-S96.
8. Meneses E, Boneva D, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Massive transfusion protocol in adult trauma population. American J of Emergency Medicine. 2020;38(12):2661-2666.
9. KM R, RL S. Management of the burned trauma patient: balancing conflicting priorities. . Burns. 2002;28(7):665-669.
10. Santaniello JM, Luchette FA, Esposito TJ, et al. Ten year experience of burn, trauma, and combined burn/trauma injuries comparing outcomes. The Journal of trauma. Oct 2004;57(4):696-700; dicussion 700-691.
11. Lee KC, Joory K, Moiemen NS. History of burns: The past, present and the future. Burns Trauma. 2014;2(4):169-180.
12. Baxter CR, Shires GT. Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation of severe burns. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1968;150(3):874-894.
13. Ivy ME, Atweh NA, Palmer J, Possenti PP, Piineau M, D’Aiuto M. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in burn patients. . The Journal of trauma. 2000;49(3):387-391.
14. Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG, Nickerson D, D’’Amours SK. Intraabdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Burn Patients. World J of Surgery. 2009;33(6):1142-1149.
15. Kasotakis G, Sideris A, Yang Y, et al. Aggressive early crystalloid resuscitation adversely affects outcomes in adult blunt trauma patients: an analysis of the Glue Grant database. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. May 2013;74(5):1215-1221; discussion 1221-1212.
16. Ley EJ, Clond MA, Srour MK, et al. Emergency department crystalloid resuscitation of 1.5 L or more is associated with increased mortality in elderly and nonelderly trauma patients. The Journal of trauma. 2011;70(2):398-400.
17. van Wessem K, Hietbrink F, Leenen L. Dilemma of crystalloid resuscitation in non-exsanguinating polytrauma: what is too much? Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020;5(1):e000593.
18. Dougherty W, Waxman K. The complexities of managing severe burns with associated trauma. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1996;76(4):923-958.