Implementing a Digital Child Behavioral Health Prevention Program in Faith-Based Settings in Uganda: A Feasibility Study

Main Article Content

Keng- Yen Huang Janet Nakigudde Tusiime Christine Sabrina Cheng Dickson Muyomba Eddie Tinka Mugisa Elizabeth Nsamba Kisakye Hafsa Sentongo Antoinette Schoenthaler Omar El-Shahawy Devin Mann

Abstract

Background: The burden of pediatric mental disorders in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is tremendous, but solutions for addressing the burden remain limited.  Although digital solutions have potential to improve prevention services, such solutions have not been systematically tested in these countries.


Objective: This study explores the use of a digital parenting intervention tool designed for pediatric behavioral health, known as the Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool, in a preventive service model for low resource communities. We study the feasibility of implementing this new digital health service model and preliminary estimate the potential impacts on parenting and child social emotional outcomes when the program is implemented in faith-based organizations in Uganda. The Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool is a preventive intervention designed to be implemented by trained community-health-workers to facilitate caregivers’ access to the preventive mental health service in community for their young children. The tool is based on the screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment prevention service model for promoting pediatric behavioral and mental health.


Methods: The evaluation study was designed using a pre-post assessment design. The content in Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool was co-designed with local expert and iteratively adapted based on parents and caregivers as well as community-health-workers and experts who were invited to provide their feedback and suggestions for improvements in content, functions, and delivery model through a series of focus groups and workshops. This pilot evaluation focuses on the pre-post changes of the intervention families (91 families) and 10 community-health-workers.


Results: We found high acceptability, appropriateness, and usefulness of the program based on the intervention families’ community-health-workers’ report. Intervention parents felt safe in using the digital toolkit. Parents felt comfortable for the CHWs asked them personal questions. In estimating the impacts, we found some expected findings on parenting and child social emotional health. Specifically, we found intervention parents become more mindful in their parenting (d=1.61, p=.049), and felt more effective in discipline their child’s misbehavior (d=1.29, p=.003) after they receive the intervention. For children, we found improvement on children’s social emotional outcomes, measured by decreased parent-child conflict (d=-1.08, p=.002) and increased child emotional regulation skills (d=1.0, p=.049) after their parents receive the intervention.


Conclusions: Our Pediatric-Behavioral Health Digital Tool has potential to provide a cost-effective service solution to provide preventive mental health care in communities to promote child social-emotional and mental wellbeing in low-resource settings.

Keywords: Faith-based-organization; parenting; health literacy, mHealth

Article Details

How to Cite
HUANG, Keng- Yen et al. Implementing a Digital Child Behavioral Health Prevention Program in Faith-Based Settings in Uganda: A Feasibility Study. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 10, oct. 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5926>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i10.5926.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;380:2197-223.

2. Omar MA, Green AT, Bird PK, et al. Mental health policy process: a comparative study of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. International journal of mental health systems. 2010;4:24. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-4-24

3. Jamison DT. Disease and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications; 2006.

4. Ssanyu R. Mental illness and exclusion: Putting mental health on the development agenda in Uganda. Policy brief 2. 2007. http://www.chronicpoverty.org/pdfs/CPRUganda/CPRC-UG_PolicyBrief2(2007).pdf

5. Olivier J, Tsimpo C, Gemignani R, et al. Understanding the roles of faith-based health-care providers in Africa: review of the evidence with a focus on magnitude, reach, cost, and satisfaction. The Lancet. 2015;386(10005):1765-1775. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60251-3

6. Chikwendu E. Faith-based organizations in Anti-HIV/AIDS work among African youth and women. Dialectical Anthropology. 2004;28:307-327.

7. Bopp M, Wilcox S, Laken M, al. e. 8 steps to fitness: a faith-based, behavior change physical activity intervention for African Americans. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(5):568-577.

8. Otolok-Tanga E, Atuyambe L, Murphy CK, Ringheim KE, Woldehanna S. Examining the actions of faith-based organizations and their influence on HIV/AIDS-related stigma: a case study of Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2007;7(1):55-60.

9. Agadjanian V, Sen S. Promises and challenges of faith-based AIDS care and supporting in Mozambique. American Journal of Public Health. 2007;97(2):362-366.

10. Gatua EW. Couty Watch: Kenya. AIDS Health Promotion Exchange. 1995;4:9.

11. Hays K, Aranda MP. Faith-Based Mental Health Interventions With African Americans: A Review. Research on social work practice. 2015;26 (7):777-789. doi:10.1177/1049731515569356

12. The Association of Religion Data Archives (ARDA). Ugandan National Profiles: Quality Data on Religion. the ARDA. Accessed Nov, 2016. http://www.thearda.com/internationalData/countries/Country_230_1.asp

13. Frew PM, Schamel JT, O'Connell KA, Randall LA, Boggavarapu S. Results of a Community Randomized Study of a Faith-Based Education Program to Improve Clinical Trial Participation among African Americans. Randomized Controlled Trial

Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Dec 22 2015;13(1):ijerph13010041. doi:10.3390/ijerph13010041

14. Abanilla PK, Huang KY, Shinners D, Levy A. Cardiovascular disease prevention in Ghana: Assessing feasibility of a faith-bases organizational approach to prevention. World Health Organization Bulletin. 2011;Under review

15. AFRICA CHA Platform. Africa Christian Health Associations Plantform. 2014. Accessed December, 2016. http://africachap.org/en/

16. UCMB. Uganda Catholic Medical Bureau. UCMB. Accessed December, 2016. http://www.ucmb.co.ug

17. World Health Organization. mhGAP Intervention Guide- Version 2.0 for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. World Health Organization; 2016.
http://www.who.int/mental_health/mhgap/mhGAP_intervention_guide_02/en/

18. AAP. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. Jul 2006;118(1):405-20. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1231

19. Leslie LK, Weckerly J, Plemmons D, Landsverk J, Eastman S. Implementing the American Academy of Pediatrics Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnostic Guidelines in Primary Care Settings. Pediatrics. 2004;114:129-140.

20. Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, et al. Global Priorities for Addressing the Burden of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders. In: Patel V, Chisholm D, Dua T, Laxminarayan R, Medina-Mora ME, eds. Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders: Disease Control Priorities. 3rd ed. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2016:chap 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK361949/

21. Sarvet BD, Wegner L. Developing effective child psychiatry collaboration with primary care: leadership and management strategies. Review. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. Jan 2010;19(1): 139-48; table of contents.
doi:10.1016/j.chc.2009.08.004

22. Wren FJ, Foy JM, Ibeziako PI. Primary care management of child & adolescent depressive disorders. Review. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. Apr 2012;21(2):401-19, ix-x. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2012.01.008

23. Janssen M, Wensing M, van der Gaag RJ, Cornelissen I, van Deurzen P, Buitelaar J. Improving patient care for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children by organizational redesign (Tornado program) and enhanced collaboration between psychiatry and general practice: a controlled before and after study. Implementation science : IS. 2014; 9:155.

24. Van Cleave J, Le TT, Perrin JM. Point-of-Care Child Psychiatry Expertise: The Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Project. Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural. Pediatrics. May 2015;135(5):834-41. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0720

25. Elkin TD, Sarver DE, Wong Sarver N, Young J, Buttross S. Future Directions for the Implementation and Dissemination of Statewide Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric Integrated Health Care. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. May 21 2016:1-12. doi:10.1080/15374416.2016.1152551

26. Asarnow JR, Rozenman M, Wiblin J, Zeltzer L. Integrated medical-behavioral care compared with usual primary care for child and adolescent behavioral health: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. 2015;160:929-937.

27. Berry AD, Garzon DL, Mack P, Kanwischer KZ, Beck DG. Implementing an early childhood developmental screening and surveillance program in primary care settings: lessons learned from a project in Illinois. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners. Nov-Dec 2014;28(6):516-25. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.04.008

28. Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2013;1:161-171.

29. Davies EB, Morriss R, Glazebrook C. Computer-delivered and web-based interventions to improve depression, anxiety, and psychological well-being of university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review. J Med Internet Res. May 16 2014;16(5):e130. doi:10.2196/jmir.3142

30. WHO. eHealth solutions in the Afircan Region: Current Context and Perspectives. WHO. Accessed April 2014.
www.afro.who.int/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=5623

31. Huang KY, Lee D, Nakigudde J, et al. Use of Technology to Promote Child Behavioral Health in the Context of Pediatric Care: A Scoping Review and Applications to Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:806. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00806

32. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. Mar 2011;38 (2):65-76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

33. Caison AL, Bulman D, Pai S, Neville D. Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian University. J Interprof Care. Jun 2008;22(3):283-94. doi:10.1080/13561820802061809

34. Nakigudde J, Bauta B, Wolf S, Huang KY. Screening Child Social Emotional and Behavioral Functioning in Low-Income Country Contexts. Jacobs Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science. 2016;2:016.

35. Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation science : IS. Aug 29 2017;12(1):108. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3

36. Huang K-Y, Nakigudde J, Ruhule D, et al. Transportability of an Evidence-based Early Childhood Intervention in a Low-Income African Country: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Implementation Study. Prevention Science. 2017; 18:964-975.

37. McCaffrey S, Reitman D, Black R. Mindfulness In Parenting Questionnaire (MIPQ): Development and Validation of a Measure of Mindful Parenting. Mindfulness. 2017/02/01 2017;8(1):232-246. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0596-7

38. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press; 2005.

39. SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS ® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Copyright © 2011, SAS Institute Inc.; 2011.

40. Whittingham K, Wee D, Boyd R. Systematic review of the efficacy of parenting interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. Jul 2011;37(4):475-83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01212.x

41. Huang KY, Nakigudde J, Rhule D, et al. Transportability of an Evidence-Based Early Childhood Intervention in a Low-Income African Country: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Study. Prevention Science. 2017/07/21 2017; doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0822-0

42. Till S, Mkhize M, Farao J, et al. Digital Health Technologies for Maternal and Child Health in Africa and Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Cross-disciplinary Scoping Review With Stakeholder Consultation. J Med Internet Res. Apr 7 2023;25:e42161. doi:10.2196/42161

43. Hossain MM, Tasnim S, Sultana A, et al. Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: a review. F1000Res. 2020;9:636. doi:10.12688/f1000research.24457.1

44. Oliveira JMD, Butini L, Pauletto P, et al. Mental health effects prevalence in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. Apr 2022;19(2):130-137. doi:10.1111/wvn.12566