Histological Evaluation of Urachal remnants

Main Article Content

Kyoko Baba Risako Ito Yuki Ando Ami Kuwabara Yuta Nimi Junpei Wato Akira Takeda

Abstract

Introduction: Urachal remnant disease occurs when the fetal urachus fails to close after birth. We perform surgical excision of umbilical sinus-type urachal remnants, aiming for complete resection to prevent residual urachal epithelium, which may become a source for urachal carcinoma. This study reports immunohistochemical findings from surgical specimens to assess epithelial involvement and inform resection strategies.


Materials and Methods: We reviewed cases of urachal remnant excision performed over one year at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Kitasato University Medical Center. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, symptoms, MRI findings, length of resected cord-like structures, and histopathological results, were examined. Histological evaluation included hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry. Markers used were keratin AE1/AE3 and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) for epithelial cells, factor VIII for vascular endothelium, α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) for smooth muscle cells, and S-100 protein for nerve fibers.


Results: Five patients (3 males, 2 females; age range 16–69 years) underwent surgery for urachal remnant disease. All presented with peri-umbilical inflammation. Preoperative MRI identified tubular structures ranging from 1.2 to 6.4 cm, while the resected cord-like structures measured 6 to 11 cm. The resected specimens were 3 to 5.2 cm longer than the tubular structures seen on MRI, and no tubular structures were observed at the surgical margins. Three cases showed clear tubular structures on H&E staining, all of which were positive for keratin AE1/AE3 and EMA, with keratin AE1/AE3 showing stronger staining. The remaining two cases, without clear tubular structures, were negative for keratin AE1/AE3 and EMA. αSMA was positive in all cases, while no significant findings were noted with factor VIII or S-100 protein.


Discussion: The ideal resection range for urachal remnants remains unclear. In this study, resecting at least 2 cm beyond inflammatory signs during surgery, combined with intraoperative confirmation of the absence of tubular structures, resulted in complete excision. Immunohistochemical staining, particularly keratin AE1/AE3, was valuable in identifying residual epithelial components, while αSMA was useful for assessing remnant structures.

Keywords: Urachal remnant, urachal epithelium, histological evaluation, keratin AE1/AE3, resection strategies

Article Details

How to Cite
BABA, Kyoko et al. Histological Evaluation of Urachal remnants. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 11, nov. 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6044>. Date accessed: 12 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i11.6044.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Larsen WJ. Human Embryology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2002.
2. Hammond G, Yglesis L, Davis JE. The urachus, its anatomy and associated fascia. Anat Rec. 1941; 80:271.
3. Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen OV. Diseases of the urachus simulating intra-abdominal disorders. Am J Surg. 1971;122(2):123-128.
4. Pedersen GL, Dahl C, Azawi NH. Non-invasive, low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in the urachus. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013: bcr2013200635.
5. Fujiyama C, Nakashima N, Tokuda Y, Uozumi J. Squamous cell carcinoma of the urachus. Int J Urol. 2007;14(10):966-968.
6. Soni HC, Marda S, Goswami KG, Vadvala H, Parekh K, Vadodaria H. Transitional cell carcinoma in urachal cyst. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35(6):764-766.
7. Maletic V, Cerovic S, Lazic M, Stojanovic M, Stevanovic P. Synchronous and multiple transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and urachal cyst. Int J Urol. 2008;15(6):554-556.
8. Baba K, Kuwabara A. Efficacy of Keratin AE1/AE3 Staining in Evaluating Resection Margins of a Urachal Remnant and Improving Surgical Precision and Outcomes: A Case Report. Cureus. 2024;16(6):e63197.
9. Kishi Y, Kikuchi K, Ogushi K, et al. Indications for Delayed Excision of Urachal Remnants. The Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons (JSPS). 2018;54(2):236-241.
10. Obatake M, Nishijima E, Takamizawa S, et al. Vitelline Duct Remnants Associated with Omphalitis. The Japanese Society of Pediatric Surgeons (JSPS). 2003;39:22-27.
11. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Mark G. The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology. 11th ed. Elsevier; 2018.
12. Wilson AL, Gandhi J, Seyam O, et al. Urachal anomalies: a review of pathological conditions, diagnosis, and management. Transl Res Anat. 2019; 16:100041.
13. Hammond G, Yglesis L, David JE. The urachus, its anatomy and associated fascia. Anat Rec. 1941; 80:271.
14. Cilento BG Jr, Bauer SB, Retik AB, et al. Urachal anomalies: defining the best diagnostic modality. Urology. 1998;52(1):120-122.
15. Naiditch JA, Radhakrishnan J, Chin AC. Current diagnosis and management of urachal remnants. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(10):2148-2152.
16. Higashimori T, Sakurai H. Immediate Umbilical Reconstruction for Treatment of Urachal Cyst. Keisei Geka. 2013;56:59-66.
17. Patel J, Villegas A. Urachal adenocarcinoma: a rare primary cancer managed with FOLFOX chemotherapy. Cureus. 2023;15:e43849. doi:10.7759/cureus.43849
18. Begg RC. The colloid adenocarcinoma of the bladder vault arising from the epithelium of the urachal canal. Br J Surg. 1931; 18:422-466.
19. Baba K, Ishiguro M, Takeda A, et al. A case of infected urachal sinus with paralytic ileus. Japanese Soc Occup Med Traumatol. 2014;62:128-132.
20. Itoh T. Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology. Kenbikyo. 2013;48:33-38. doi:10.11410/kenbikyo.48.1_33
21. Sloane JP, et al. An assessment of the value of epithelial membrane antigen and other epithelial markers in solving diagnostic problems in tumour histopathology. Histochem J. 1983; 15:645-654.
22. Baba K, Yamazaki Y, Ikemoto S, et al. Osteogenic potential of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells cultured with umbilical cord blood-derived autoserum. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 40:768-772.
23. Sarugaser R, Lickorish D, Baksh D, Hosseini MM, Davies JE. Human umbilical cord perivascular (HUCPV) cells: A source of mesenchymal progenitors. Stem Cells. 2005;23:220-229.
24. Pivoriūnas A, Bernotiene E, Unguryte A, et al. Isolation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem-like cells from human umbilical cord vein endothelium and subendothelium. Biologija. 2006;2:99-103.