Haemophilia Gene Therapy: Patient Selection and Experience in the Era of Precision Medicine

Main Article Content

Dr Sara Boyce, MBBS, BSc, MRCP, FRCPath Dr Rashid Kazmi, MBBS, FRCP, FRCPath

Abstract

The emergence of gene therapy as a therapeutic modality for haemophilia has generated a spectrum of responses within the patient population, ranging from enthusiastic endorsement to measured scepticism. Following the European Medicines Agency's approval of two novel gene therapies for haemophilia B, the imperative for sophisticated patient selection protocols has become increasingly apparent to ensure both the safe administration of therapy and optimisation of clinical outcomes. Haemophilia gene therapy trials to date have demonstrated that psychosocial factors are critical components of the gene therapy pathway alongside clinical eligibility to facilitate rigorous follow-up protocols and maximize the probability of sustained transgene expression. Experiences of participants in haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials are valuable for informing prospective recipients during pre-consent counselling to appropriately calibrate treatment expectations and thoroughly comprehend the multifaceted risk-benefit profile, including the inherent uncertainties associated with long-term outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
BOYCE, Dr Sara; KAZMI, Dr Rashid. Haemophilia Gene Therapy: Patient Selection and Experience in the Era of Precision Medicine. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 12, dec. 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6051>. Date accessed: 06 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i12.6051.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Iorio A, Stonebraker JS, Chambost H, et al. Establishing the Prevalence and Prevalence at Birth of Hemophilia in Males: A Meta-analytic Approach Using National Registries. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171(8):540. doi:10.7326/M19-1208

2. Fornari A, Antonazzo IC, Rocino A, et al. The psychosocial impact of haemophilia from patients’ and caregivers’ point of view: The results of an Italian survey. Haemophilia. 2024;30(2):449-462. doi:10.1111/hae.14926

3. Collins PW, Obaji SG, Roberts H, Gorsani D, Rayment R. Clinical phenotype of severe and moderate haemophilia: Who should receive prophylaxis and what is the target trough level? Haemophilia. 2021;27(2):192-198. doi:10.1111/hae.14201

4. Mannucci PM. Hemophilia treatment innovation: 50 years of progress and more to come. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21(3):403-412. doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2022.12.029

5. Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia. 2020;26(S6) :1-158. doi:10.1111/hae.14046

6. Leebeek FWG, Miesbach W. Gene therapy for hemophilia: a review on clinical benefit, limitations, and remaining issues. Blood. 2021;138(11):923-931. doi:10.1182/blood.2019003777

7. Mahlangu J, Oldenburg J, Paz-Priel I, et al. Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Patients Who Have Hemophilia A without Inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(9):811-822. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1803550

8. Matsushita T, Shapiro A, Abraham A, et al. Phase 3 Trial of Concizumab in Hemophilia with Inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(9):783-794. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2216455

9. Matino D, Acharya S, Palladino A, et al. Efficacy and Safety of the Anti-Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Marstacimab in Participants with Severe Hemophilia without Inhibitors: Results from the Phase 3 Basis Trial. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1) :285-285. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-181263

10. Pasi KJ. Gene therapy for haemophilia. Br J Haematol. 2001;115(4):744-757.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03225.x

11. Deshpande SR, Joseph KD, Tong J, Chen Y, Pishko A, Cuker A. Adeno-Associated Virus-based Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A and B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Blood Adv. Published online October 7, 2024:bloodadvances.2024014111. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014111

12. Chowdary P, Duran B, Batty P, et al. UKHCDO gene therapy taskforce: Guidance for implementation of haemophilia gene therapy into routine clinical practice for adults. Haemophilia. Published online November 20, 2024:hae.15125. doi:10.1111/hae.15125

13. Fletcher S, Jenner K, Holland M, Khair K. Barriers to gene therapy, understanding the concerns people with haemophilia have: an exigency sub-study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024;19(1):59. doi:10.1186/s13023-024-03068-2

14. Mingozzi F, High KA. Immune responses to AAV vectors: overcoming barriers to successful gene therapy. Blood. 2013;122(1):23-36. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-01-306647

15. Pipe SW, Leebeek FWG, Recht M, et al. Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(8):706-718. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2211644

16. Young G. Induction of factor VIII tolerance by hemophilia gene transfer to eradicate factor VIII inhibitors. Blood Adv. Published online October 17, 2024:bloodadvances.2024013000. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013000

17. Krumb E, Hermans C. Living with a “hemophilia‐free mind” – The new ambition of hemophilia care? Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021; 5(5). doi:10.1002/rth2.12567

18. Fletcher S, Jenner K, Pembroke L, Holland M, Khair K. The experiences of people with haemophilia and their families of gene therapy in a clinical trial setting: regaining control, the Exigency study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17(1):155. doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02256-2

19. Boyce S, Fletcher S, Jones A, et al. Educational needs of patients, families, and healthcare professionals to support the patient journey in haemophilia gene therapy in the UK. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):366. doi:10.1186/s13023-023-02977-y

20. Aradom E, Gomez K. The patient gene therapy journey: Findings from qualitative interviews with trial participants at one UK haemophilia centre. J Haemoph Pract. 2021;8(1):32-44.
doi:10.17225/jhp00174

21. Ozelo MC, Mahlangu J, Pasi KJ, et al. Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(11):1013-1025. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2113708

22. Itzler R, Buckner TW, Leebeek FWG, et al. Effect of etranacogene dezaparvovec on quality of life for severe and moderately severe haemophilia B participants: Results from the phase III HOPE‐B trial 2 years after gene therapy. Haemophilia. 2024; 30(3):709-719. doi:10.1111/hae.14977

23. Quinn J, Delaney KA, Wong WY, Miesbach W, Bullinger M. Psychometric Validation of the Haemo-QOL-A in Participants with Hemophilia A Treated with Gene Therapy. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022;Volume 13:169-180. doi:10.2147/PROM.S357555

24. O’Mahony B, Dunn AL, Leavitt AD, et al. Health-related quality of life following valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy for severe hemophilia A in the phase 3 trial GENEr8-1. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21(12):3450-3462. doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.08.032

25. Leavitt AD, Mahlangu J, Raheja P, et al. Efficacy, safety, and quality of life 4 years after valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene transfer for severe hemophilia A in the phase 3 GENEr8-1 trial. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8(8):102615. doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102615

26. Rasul E, Hallock R, Hellmann M, et al. Gene Therapy in Hemophilia: A Transformational Patient Experience. J Patient Exp. 2023;10:2374373523 1193572. doi:10.1177/23743735231193573

27. Baas L, van der Graaf R, Meijer K. Can hemophilia be cured? It depends on the definition. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8(6):102559. doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102559