The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on young and elderly psychological well-being: the role of social and cultural participation. A cross-sectional exploratory study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: In the last 20 years a growing literature has highlighted the role of social and cultural activities in fostering individual and community well-being. The Covid-19 pandemic had an important impact on individuals and communities given the lockdown policies enacted, causing the unexpected and forced abandonment of these activities.
Aims: The present work investigates the impact caused by Covid-19 and the consequent suspension of all associated social and cultural opportunities for young and elderly individual subjective well-being.
Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional survey in January 2020 (t1, pre-pandemic), and a second carried out one year later in February 2021 (t2 post-pandemic), on a sample of individuals from 18 to 34 years old and >64 years old in a town lying within the metropolitan area of Milan (Italy). We employed the PGWBI - Psychological General Well-Being Index to assess the psychological aspect and to measure the influence of the social and cultural dimensions. P-value, Cohen g and Pearson r statistical techniques were employed.
Results: Results show that the psychological well-being increased for the sample of young people from 67.82 to 76.49, and decreased for the >64 sample from 59.84 to 57.23. An analysis of the correlation shows that social and cultural participation played a role in promoting the young’s well-being and reduced the impact of the pandemic in those >64.
Conclusion: Some socio-demographic variables seem to be affected by the pandemic in both cohorts. The contribution of social and cultural activities appears relevant, thus providing elements for further investigation in the field of the relationship between these dimensions and individual subjective well-being.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Agahi N, Parker MG. Leisure activities and mortality: does gender matter?. Journal of aging and health. 2008;20(7):855-871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264308324631
3. Ventura C, Gullà D, Graves M, Bergonzoni A, Tassinari R, Cavallini, Von Stietencron J. Cell melodies: when sound speaks to stem cells. CellR4. 2017;5(2):23319.
4. Grossi E, Tavano Blessi G, Sacco PL. Magic moments: determinants of stress relief and subjective wellbeing from visiting a cultural heritage site. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry. 2019;43(1):4-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-018-9593-8
5. Diener E, Suh EM. Culture and subjective well-being. Mit Press. 2000.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2242.001.0001
6. Michalos AC. Arts and the quality of life: An exploratory study. Social Indicators Research. 2005; 71(1):11–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8013-3
7. Adams KB, Leibbrandt S, Moon H. A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing & Society. 2011; 31(4):683-712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001091
8. Brajša-Žganec A, Merkaš M, Šverko I. Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being?. Social Indicators Research. 2011;102(1): 81-91.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9724-2
9. Grossi E, Sacco PL, Tavano Blessi G, Cerutti R. The impact of culture on the individual subjective well-being of the Italian population: An exploratory study. AppliedRresearch in Quality of Life. 2011;6:387-410.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9135-1
10. Erickson B. Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology. 1996;102(1):217–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/230912
11. Christin A. Gender, early socialization in the arts and cultural participation in the United States. CACPS Working Paper No. 42. 2011. Princeton University.
12. Gough C, Barr C, Lewis L K, Hutchinson C, Maeder A, George S. Older adults’ community participation, physical activity, and social interactions during and following COVID-19 restrictions in Australia: a mixed methods approach. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15093-0
13. Wilke J, Hollander K, Mohr L, Edouard P, Fossati C, González-Gross M, et al. Drastic reductions in mental well-being observed globally during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the ASAP survey. Frontiers in Medicine, 2021;8, 578959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.578959
14. Villani L, Pastorino R, Molinari E, Anelli F, Ricciardi W, Graffigna G, Boccia S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being of students in an Italian university: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Globalization and Health. 2021; 17:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00680-w
15. Maggi G, Baldassarre I, Barbaro A, Cavallo ND, Cropano M, Nappo R, Santangelo G. Mental health status of Italian elderly subjects during and after quarantine for the COVID‐19 pandemic: a cross‐sectional and longitudinal study. Psychogeriatrics, 2021;21(4):540-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12703
16. Tavano Blessi G, Grossi E, Sacco PL, Pieretti G, Ferilli G. Cultural participation, relational goods and individual subjective well-being: some empirical evidence. Review of Economics & Finance. 2014; 4(3):33-46.
17. Dupuy HJ. The Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) Index. In N.K. Wenger, M.E. Mattson, C.D. Furburg, J. Elinson (Eds.) Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. 1990:170-178, Le Jacq Publishing.
18. Tavano Blessi G. Grossi E, Viganò F. Cultural participation as a balancing factor in the gender-related psychological well-being gap: an exploratory study on the Italian population. Journal of Sex- and Gender-Specific Medicine. 2023;9(2):87 – 95. doi 10.1723/4078.40639
19. Grossi E, Groth N, Mosconi P, Cerutti R, Pace F, Compare A, Apolone G. Development and validation of the short version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB-S). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2006;4:88- 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-88
20. Bruzzi S, Ivaldi E, Santagata M. Measuring regional performance in the Italian NHS: are disparities decreasing? Social Indicators Research. 2022;159(3):1057-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02775-8
21. Matud MP, López-Curbelo M, Fortes D. Gender and psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(19):3531. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193531
22. Parker G, Brotchie H. Gender differences in depression. International Review of Psychiatry. 2010;22(5): 429-436. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2010.492391
23. Rieker PP, Bird CE. Rethinking Gender Differences in Health: Why We Need to Integrate Social and Biological Perspectives. Journals of Gerontology. 2005;60B (suppl-II 40-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.Special_Issue_2.S40
24. Umberson D, Chen MD, House JS, Hopkins K, Slaten E. The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different?. American Sociological Review. 1996; 61(5):837-857. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096456
25. Khorani H, Mohammadi F, Hosseinkhani Z, Motalebi SA. Predictive factors of Quality of Life in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC psychology. 2022;10(1):176.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00882-w
26. Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H, Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Social Science & Medicine. 1996;42(4): 617-624 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00335-5
27. Tamosiunas A, Sapranaviciute-Zabazlajeva L, Luksiene D, Virviciute D, Peasey A. Psychological well-being and mortality: longitudinal findings from Lithuanian middle-aged and older adults study. Social psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2019;54:803-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01657-2
28. Biassoni F, Salducco A, Abati D. The COVID-19 “first lockdown” experience in Italy: the role of hope and optimism and their impact on psychological well-being and risk perception. European Journal of Mental Health. 2022;17(2):89-103. https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.17.2022.2.10
29. Bruzzi S, Ivaldi E, Santagata M. Measuring regional performance in the Italian NHS: are disparities decreasing? Social Indicators Research. 2022;159(3):1057-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02775-8
30. Kuykendall L, Tay L, Ng V. Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin. 2015;141:364–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038508
31. Van der Meer PH. Gender, unemployment and subjective well-being: why being unemployed is worse for men than for women. Social Indicator Research. 2014;115(1):23-44.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0207-5
32. Grossi E, Tavano Blessi G, & Sacco PL. Magic moments: determinants of stress relief and subjective wellbeing from visiting a cultural heritage site. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry. 2019;43(1): 4-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-018-9593-8
33. Hampshire KR, Matthijsse M. Can arts projects improve young people’s wellbeing? A social capital approach. Social science & medicine. 2010;71(4): 708-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.015