Comparative retrospective analysis of auriculotherapy with mechanical needles and cryogenic needles for pain treatment

Main Article Content

David Alimi Sarah Dauchy Isabelle Nègre Christophe Gueguen

Abstract

To compare the effects of so-called semi-permanent needles and cryogenic needles in auriculotherapy performed at a hospital or independently. We analyzed the auriculotherapy consultation records of Gustave Roussy and Kremlin Bicêtre hospitals, and of the medical practices of Drs. D. Alimi and C. Gueguen, from November 2010 to February 2012. Results on pain intensity were compared according to whether patients had received auriculotherapy with semi-permanent needles or cryogenic needles, in different pathologies.


A total of 2,147 patient records were analyzed, of which 90% suffered from chronic pain and 10% from acute pain. 79% of patients had been treated in the practices of Drs. D. Alimi and C. Gueguen, and 21% in Gustave Roussy and Kremlin Bicêtre hospitals (with participation of Dr. D. Alimi). 1,355 patients were familiar with auriculotherapy, of which 652 were treated with semi-permanent needles and 703 with cryogenic needles. 792 patients were not familiar with AT and were treated with cryogenic needles. In those already familiar with auriculotherapy, 75% of patients treated with semi-permanent needles were relieved of their pain compared to 80% of those treated with cryogenic needles; while among patients not familiar with auriculotherapy, 72% of those treated with semi-permanent needles and 79% of those treated with cryogenic needles were relieved of their pain.


Positive results were obtained with both semi-permanent and cryogenic needles, with slight superiority for the latter, knowing that these results were not from a randomized controlled trial.

Article Details

How to Cite
ALIMI, David et al. Comparative retrospective analysis of auriculotherapy with mechanical needles and cryogenic needles for pain treatment. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 11, nov. 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6081>. Date accessed: 12 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i11.6081.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Rabischong P. Med Acupunct. 26(2):84-96. doi:101089/acu.2014.1038.
2. Larsen WJ. Human embryology. De Boeck; 2011.
3. Hockfield S, Kalb RG. Activity-dependent structural changes during neuronal development. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1993;3(1):87-92.
4. Onteniente B, Peschanski M, Prochiantz A, Ollat H. Functional neuroanatomy. Volume 3: development and plasticity. ANPP; 1996.
5. Auziech O. Acupuncture et auriculothérapie. Essai d’analyse histologique de quelques structures cutanées impliquées dans ces deux techniques. Sauramps; 1984
6. Terral C. Douleur et acupuncture. De la recherche à la Clinique. Sauramps Medical; 2009.
7. Bossy J. Bases neurobiologiques des réflexothérapies. 3e éd. Masson; 1983.
8. Vnitr L. Pavel Cech. 2019;65 (5):379-389. PMID: 31163973.
9. Alimi D, Gessmann A, Gardeur D. Auricular acupuncture stimulation measured on functional magnetic resonance imaging. Med Acup. 2002;13:18-21.
10. Liboni W, Romoli M, Allais G, et al. The fMRI for the auricular acupuncture validation: Experimental protocol [presentation; in Italian]. Acti XXII Congresso Nationale Soc Ital Rifles Ago Auri (SIRAA). 2007;November16–17
11. Okorie EC, Santosa H, Alter BJ, Chelly JE, et al. Ipsilateral stimulation shows somatotopy of thumb and shoulder auricular points on the left primary somatosensory cortex using high-density fNIRS. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Sep 16:2024.09.16.612477. doi:10.1101/2024.09.16.612477.PMID: 39345597
12. Eric Kandel, John D. Koester, Sarah H. Mack, Steven Siegelbaum. Principles of Neural Science. April 2021.
13. Carter R. The Brain Book. Human Body Guides. Dorling Kindersley Ltd; 2019
14. David E, Presti W, et al. Foundational Concepts in Neuroscience: A Brain-Mind Odyssey. January 2016.
15. Steegmann Jr. AT. Human facial temperatures in natural and laboratory cold. 1979; 50(3):227-32 PMID: 45432.
16. Sliosberg A. Cryopuncture in current medical practice. Press Med. 1952.20.60(81:1730
17. Vanggard L. Physiological reactions to wet-cold. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine. 1975;January33-36
18. Zeveke AV, Efes ED, Malysheva GI et al. Analysis of activity in A and C fibers under mechanical and thermal stimulation in the skin receptor field. Program Brain research. 1976;43:151-157
19. Evans PJD. Cryoanalgesia: the application of low temperature to nerves to produce anesthesia or analgesia. Anesthesia. 1981;36:1003-1013
20. Lecroart Jl, Deklunder G, Houdas Y. Dynamique de refroidissement sous cryothérapie par azote liquid vaporisé et par glace. Laboratoire de physiologie de la faculté de médecine de Lille. 1990; rapport JETCOOL
21. Alimi D , Rubino F, Lewandowski EP et al. Analgesic Effect of Auricular Acupuncture for Cancer Pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2000;19:81-82
22. Alimi D. Xerostomia induced by radiotherapy. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. Dovepress. 2015;11:1-4
23. Alimi D, Chelly J.E. Auriculotherapy in anesthesia and pain treatment. Praticien en Anesthesie Reanimation. 2016;20,2,1:97–100
24. Nomenclature Normative Internationale. ISBN: 978-2-220-06330-0. Desclée de Brouwer Edition: Sept. 2011;372-375.
25. Alimi D, Chelly J.E. New Universal Nomenclature in Auriculotherapy. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24:7-14.