Global Research in Clinical Psychology Domain: A Scientometric Assessment Based on Web of Science

Main Article Content

Pooja Sehwag Prof. Meera

Abstract

This paper attempts to examine the global research productivity and trends of clinical psychology based on Web of Science data and also highlights it from an Indian viewpoint. The study reveals a growing global interest in mental health issues. Overall, the volume of publications has increased, with the highest number produced in the form of articles. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a drop in publications, with the relative growth rate decreasing and the doubling time increasing from 1990 to 2023. Countries like the United States, the UK, and Germany dominate the field due to their strong academic institutions and substantial funding. India collaborates most with the USA, England, and Australia. The interdisciplinary nature of clinical psychology, with overlap in neuroscience, psychiatry, and public health, has led to more comprehensive research outcomes addressing complex mental health issues. Key research areas, such as psychiatry, neuropsychology, psychopathology, family studies, health psychology, Substance abuse, and Rehabilitation, continue to drive innovation and inform evidence-based practices for advancing mental health care globally. The United States Department of Health and Human Services USA has funded the maximum number of publications globally, while the National Council on Science and Technology and the Indian Council of Medical Research have funded the most publications from India. Zvolensky Michael J has produced the maximum publications globally and Andrade Chittranjan is the topmost Indian author. The University of California System is the top affiliation globally and the National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences is the topmost affiliation from India.

Keywords: Clinical Psychology, Scientometrics, Web of Science, World

Article Details

How to Cite
SEHWAG, Pooja; MEERA, Prof.. Global Research in Clinical Psychology Domain: A Scientometric Assessment Based on Web of Science. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 12, dec. 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6090>. Date accessed: 06 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i12.6090.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Clinical Psychology. American Psychological Association. Published 2024. https://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/specialize/clinical

2. Kazdin AE. Clinical Psychology: science, practice, and culture. Oxford University Press; 2008. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16826215

3. Moed HF. Citation analysis in research evaluation.; 2005. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3714-7

4. Zhang J, Rousseau R. The International Comparative Performance of the Medical Sciences in PLOS ONE and Web of Science. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(9).

5. Pomerantz AM. Clinical Psychology: science, practice, and culture. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications; 2013. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16826215

6. Web of Science, Clarivate. Academia and Government. Published 2024. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/

7. Waltman L, Van Eck NJ. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. The European Physical Journal B. 2013; 86(11). doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0

8. Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L. The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;67(3):707-714. doi:10.1002/asi.23408

9. Aarts AA, Anderson JE, Anderson CJ, et al. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349(6251). doi:10.1126/ science.aac4716

10. Hamidi A, Khosravi A, Hejazi R, FatemehTorabi N, Abtin A. A scientometric approach to psychological research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. 2023;43(1):155-164. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04264-2

11. Wang F, Guo J, Yang G. Study on positive psychology from 1999 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101157

12. Grover S, Gupta B, Bansal M, Ahmed KKM. Covid-19 and Psychology: A Scientometric Assessment of India’s Publications during 2020-21. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2022;12 (1):01-07. doi:10.5530/ijmedph.2022.1.1

13. Hulloli PB. Research on subject area of psychology in India: Scientometric study. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research. 10:76-79. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Praveen-Hulloli/publication/358604738_Research_on_Subject_area_of_Psychology_in_India_Scientometric_Study/links/620b3493afa8884cabe4a58c/Research-on-Subject-area-of-Psychology-in-India-Scientometric-Study.pdf

14. Hulloli PB. Research on Psychology in India and South Africa A comparative scientometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal). Published online 2021. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5828

15. Liu S, Oakland T. The emergence and evolution of school psychology literature: A scientometric analysis from 1907 through 2014. School Psychology Quarterly. 2016;31(1):104-121. doi:10.1037/spq0000141

16. Naveed S, Waqas A, Majeed S, Zeshan M, Jahan N, Sheikh MH. Child psychiatry: A scientometric analysis 1980-2016. F1000Research. 2017;6:1293. doi:10.12688/f1000research.12069.1

17. Barlow DH. The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Psychology.; 2014. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/978019 9328710.001.0001