↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background: Bone health has emerged as a critical modifiable risk factor for complications following adult spinal deformity correction. Among these complications, mechanical issues and proximal junctional kyphosis/failure remain particularly challenging, affecting up to 61% and 44% of patients, respectively. We hypothesized that osteoporotic patients undergoing deformity correction experience higher rates of instrumentation failure and proximal junctional kyphosis/failure.

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the complication profiles of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients undergoing long thoracolumbar fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study

Patient Sample: adult spinal deformity patients who underwent long thoracolumbar spinal fusion (>7 levels) at two large academic medical centers between 2010 and 2019.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included pseudarthrosis with or without implant failure, proximal junctional kyphosis/failure rates, infection rates, and time to complication occurrence.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed deformity patients undergoing long-segment instrumentation (≥7 levels) with a minimum two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included spinal deformity secondary to tumor, infection, trauma, or neuromuscular disorders. Preoperative osteoporosis status was determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-scores at the hip and femoral neck. The complication profiles of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic deformity patients were compared using Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables.

Results: Among 399 adult spinal deformity patients, 131 (32.8%) were osteoporotic. Osteoporotic patients were significantly older than their non-osteoporotic counterparts [66.43 (SD: 8.9) vs. 63.51 (SD: 8.9), P = 0.0018]. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in osteoporotic patients compared to non-osteoporotic patients [40.5% (n = 53) vs. 28.0% (n = 75), P = 0.0122]. Incidences of PJK [35.1% (n = 46) vs. 21.6% (n = 58), P = 0.0040] and PJF [19.8% (n = 26) vs. 6.7% (n = 18), P = 0.0001] were also higher in the osteoporotic group, while rates of construct failure/pseudarthrosis [11.5% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.2578] and infection [4.6% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.6849] showed no significant differences. Time to pseudarthrosis (8.1 vs. 8.3 months, P = 0.4582), infection (4.7 vs. 1.5 months, P = 0.0773), PJF (9.3 vs. 10.1 months, P = 0.7300), and overall time to first complication (8.4 vs. 7.6 months, P = 0.5119) were similar between the groups.

Conclusions: Osteoporotic patients have increased risk of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure compared to non-osteoporotic patients, highlighting the need for preoperative osteoporosis surveillance, optimization, and postoperative monitoring to mitigate complications.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 13 No 1 (2025): Vol.13 issue 1 January 2025
SectionResearch Articles
Published30 January 2025
DOI10.18103/mra.v13i1.6199
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

SM

Sarthak Mohanty, MD

Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston MA 02114

AG

Anmol Gupta, MD, MBA

Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston MA 02114

HF

Harold Fogel, MD

Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston MA 02114

DT

Daniel Tobert, MD

Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston MA 02114

SH

Stuart Hershman, MD

Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston MA 02114

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗