Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Breast Cancer: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Tissue Mapping

Main Article Content

Donato M. Ceres, PhD Wendy M. Mikkelson, MD Christopher W. Gregory, PhD James J. Marx, PhD William D. Gregory, PhD

Abstract

Breast cancer remains one of the most diagnosed malignancies, necessitating early detection and accurate prognostic assessment. Traditional imaging methods play a crucial role in screening but often lack specificity, particularly in patients with dense breast tissue. Histopathological examination is still the gold standard but is invasive and time-consuming.


Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a promising non-invasive method for detecting malignancies by examining tissue electrical properties. The Cole relaxation frequency (CRF), derived from impedance spectroscopy, effectively differentiates malignant from benign breast tissue and serves as a strong prognostic marker. Elevated CRF values correlate with changes in cellular structure and membrane polarization, helping to predict recurrence risk and metastatic potential.


Electrical Property Enhanced Tomography represents a significant advancement over traditional electrical impedance-based imaging techniques by integrating external anatomical imaging modalities to enhance spatial resolution. This method uses anatomical data to guide impedance-based reconstructions, thereby effectively reducing the error and instability commonly associated with conventional approaches. As a result, the accuracy of tissue property mapping is substantially improved. In addition, the structured placement of electrodes, combined with the application of a conductive bolus, contributes to greater measurement consistency and reliability.


Beyond breast cancer, intraoperative CRF and other impedance-derived features, combined with AI-driven machine learning algorithms, have shown promise for surgical margin assessment in dermal tissues, improving precision and workflow efficiency. This review summarizes more than two decades of the authors’ work on the use of bioelectrical impedance in cancer research and clinical applications.

Article Details

How to Cite
CERES, Donato M. et al. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Breast Cancer: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Tissue Mapping. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 5, may 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6306>. Date accessed: 21 june 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i5.6306.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3): 209-249.

2. Crosby D, Bhatia S, Brindle KM, et al. Early detection of cancer. Science. 2022;375(6586):eaay 9040.

3. Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, et al. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):66. Published 2019 Sep 23.

4. Bonotto M, Gerratana L, Poletto E, et al. Measures of outcome in metastatic breast cancer: insights from a real-world scenario. Oncologist. 2014;19(6):608-615.

5. Hu M, Shao B, Ran R, Li H. Prognostic factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a literature review. Transl Cancer Res. 2021;10(4): 1644-1655.

6. Lord SJ, Bahlmann K, O'Connell DL, et al. De novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer - A systematic review of population-level changes in survival since 1995. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;44: 101282. Published 2022 Jan 29.

7. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438-451.

8. Liu H, Zhan H, Sun D, Zhang Y. Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women. BMC Med Imaging. 2020;20(1):98. Published 2020 Aug 15.

9. Tao Z, Qi H, Ma Y. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in benign and malignant breast masses. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15(4):2870-2877. Published 2023 Apr 15.

10. Mayo, R. C., & Romero, A. (2020). Redefining the Use of Breast Imaging: Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI in Dense Breasts and Breast Cancer Screening. American Journal of Roentgenology, 214(2), 295-306.

11. Dianatinasab M, Fararouei M, Mohammadianpanah M, Zare-Bandamiri M. Impact of social and clinical factors on diagnostic delay of breast cancer: A Cross-sectional Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(38):e4704.

12. Aresta G, Araújo T, Kwok S, et al. BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. Med Image Anal. 2019;56:122-139.

13. Yu F, Xiao Z, Liu L, et al. BiaCanDet: Bioelectrical impedance analysis for breast cancer detection with space–time attention neural network. Expert Systems with Applications. 2025;269:126 223.

14. Abasi S, Aggas JR, Garayar-Leyva GG, Walther BK, Guiseppi-Elie A. Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Monitoring Mammalian Cells and Tissues under Different Frequency Domains: A Review. ACS Measurement Science Au. Published online August 19, 2022.

15. Branco MG, Mateus C, Capelas ML, et al. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) for the Assessment of Body Composition in Oncology: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2023;15(22):4792. Published 2023 Nov 15.

16. Gregory WD, Marx JJ, Gregory CW, Mikkelson WM, Tjoe JA, Shell J. The Cole relaxation frequency as a parameter to identify cancer in breast tissue. Med Phys. 2012;39(7):4167-4174.

17. Bogdanowicz L, Onur Fidaner, Ceres D, Grycuk A, Guidetti M, Demos D. The Cole Relaxation Frequency as a Parameter to Identify Cancer in Lung Tissue: Preliminary Animal and Ex-Vivo Patient Studies. JMIR Biomedical Engineering. 2022;7(1): e35346-e35346.

18. Svoboda RM, Gharia MJ, Shell J, Gregory WD. Bioimpedance measurement as an assessment of margin positivity in Mohs surgical specimens of nonmelanoma skin cancer: Management implications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(3):591-593.

19. Federica Dibennardo, Onur Fidaner, Bogdanowicz L, et al. Bioimpedance based biomarker for the detection of precancerous and cancerous lesions of the pancreas: feasibility animal study. Translational medicine communications. 2024;9(1).

20. Bogdanowicz L, Guidetti M, Onur Fidaner, et al. S31 Cole Relaxation Frequency: A Parameter for Pancreatic Cancer Detection. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2022;117(10S):e24-e25.

21. Gregory WD, Christie SM, Shell J, Nahhas GJ, Singh M, Mikkelson W. Cole Relaxation Frequency as a Prognostic Parameter for Breast Cancer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020;7(4):343-348. Published 2020 Oct 23.

22. Gregory WD, Christie SM, Gregory CW, Marx JJ, Shell J, et al. (2021) The Cole Relaxation Frequency as a Parameter to Identify and Spatially Map Cancer in Breast Tissue: Preliminary In-Vivo Patient Study. Transl Biomed Vol.12 No.9:192

23. Stupin DD, Kuzina, Ekaterina A, Abelit AA, et al. Bio-Impedance Spectroscopy: Basics and Applications. arXiv.org. Published 2020.

24. Campa F, Coratella G, Cerullo G, et al. High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2024;22(1).

25. Poßner L, Seebeck L, Laukner M, et al. A four-point measurement probe for brain tissue conductivity and permittivity characterization. Published online April 30, 2021.

26. Bera TK. Bioelectrical Impedance and The Frequency Dependent Current Conduction Through Biological Tissues: A Short Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018; 331:012005.

27. Yu Y, Kalra AM, Anand G, Lowe A. A Pilot Study Examining the Dielectric Response of Human Forearm Tissues. Biosensors. 2023;13(11):961-961.

28. Moqadam SM, Grewal PK, Haeri Z, Ingledew PA, Kohli K, Golnaraghi F. Cancer Detection Based on Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy: A Clinical Study. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2018;9(1):17-23. Published 2018 Aug 16.

29. Rejniak KA, Estrella V, Chen T, Cohen AS, Lloyd MC, Morse DL. The Role of Tumor Tissue Architecture in Treatment Penetration and Efficacy: An Integrative Study. Frontiers in Oncology. 2013;3.

30. Zanotelli MR, Zhang J, Reinhart-King CA. Mechanoresponsive metabolism in cancer cell migration and metastasis. Cell Metab. 2021;33(7): 1307-1321.

31. Teixeira VS, Labitzky V, Schumacher U, Krautschneider W. Use of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy to Distinguish Cancer from Normal Tissues with a Four Electrode Terminal Setup. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering. 2020;6(3): 341-344.

32. Crowell LL, Yakisich JS, Aufderheide B, Adams TNG. Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Monitoring Chemoresistance of Cancer Cells. Micromachines (Basel). 2020;11(9):832. Published 2020 Aug 31.

33. Brosseau C, Sabri E. Resistor–capacitor modeling of the cell membrane: A multiphysics analysis. Journal of Applied Physics. 2021;129(1): 011101.

34. Zakharian E. Recording of ion channel activity in planar lipid bilayer experiments. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;998:109-118.

35. Membrane Potential and the Passive Electrical Properties of the Neuron. McGraw Hill Medical. Published 2025.

36. Electrical Properties of Cells. Cellular Physiology of Nerve and Muscle. Published online July 25, 2013:216-224.

37. Lu Z, Niekerk D van, Savva A, et al. Understanding electrochemical properties of supported lipid bilayers interfaced with organic electronic devices. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2022;10(20):8050-8060.

38. Mueller P, Rudin DO, Tien HT, Wescott WC. Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system. Nature. 1962;194:979-980.

39. Tore Skotland, Kavaliauskiene S, Sandvig K. The role of lipid species in membranes and cancer-
related changes. 2020;39(2):343-360.

40. Biasiotta A, D’Arcangelo D, Passarelli F, Nicodemi EM, Facchiano A. Ion channels expression and function are strongly modified in solid tumors and vascular malformations. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2016;14(1).

41. Kyle, U. G., Bosaeus, I., De Lorenzo, A. D., Deurenberg, P., Elia, M., Gómez, J. M., Heitmann, B. L., Kent-Smith, L., Melchior, J. C., Pirlich, M., Scharfetter, H., Schols, A. M., & Pichard, C. (2004). Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clinical Nutrition, 23(5), 1226-1243.

42. Lukaski HC. Methods for the assessment of human body composition: traditional and new. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;46(4):537-556.

43. Portero AJ, “Development of a software application suite for electrical bioimpedance data analysis,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Boeras, Sweden, 2010.

44. Schwan HP. Electrical properties of tissue and cell suspensions. Adv Biol Med Phys. 1957;5: 147-209.

45. Cole, K. S., & Cole, R. H. (1941). Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 9(4), 341-351

46. Holm S, Holm T, Martinsen ØG. Simple circuit equivalents for the constant phase element. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248786. Published 2021 Mar 26.

47. Shell J, Gregory WD. Efficient Cancer Detection Using Multiple Neural Networks. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2017;5:2800607. Published 2017 Nov 15.

48. Galea MH, Blamey RW, Elston CE, Ellis IO. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;22(3):207-219.

49. Cox DR. Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1972;34(2):187-202.

50. Juan Carlos Gómez-Cortés, José Javier Díaz-Carmona, José Alfredo Padilla-Medina, et al. Electrical Impedance Tomography Technical Contributions for Detection and 3D Geometric Localization of Breast Tumors: A Systematic Review. Micromachines. 2022;13(4):496-496.

51. Gregory WD, Gregory CW. Electrical Property Enhanced Tomography (EPET). Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat No00CH37143). 2025;4:2632-2635.

52. Gregory CW. The Use of Charge-Charge Correlation in Impedance Measurements: A Test of the EPET Method. Ph.D. Thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, 2005.

53. Golub GH, Reinsch C. Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions. Numerische Mathematik. 1970;14(5):403-420.

54. Caifeng, Liu. “Frozen Section: A Vital Tool in Surgical Pathology.” J Surg Path Diag 5 (2023): 159.

55. Schrunder AF, Rodriguez S, Rusu A. A Finite Element Analysis and Circuit Modelling Methodology for Studying Electrical Impedance Myography of Human Limbs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69 (1):244-255.

56. Bora DJ, Dasgupta R. Estimation of skin impedance models with experimental data and a proposed model for human skin impedance. IET Syst Biol. 2020;14(5):230-240.

57. Abe Y, Nishizawa M. Electrical aspects of skin as a pathway to engineering skin devices. APL Bioeng. 2021;5(4):041509. Published 2021 Nov 18.

58. Long T. The Role of Toluidine Blue in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Cutis. 2023;112(6).