Ethical Considerations in Cardiac Pacemaker Therapies

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Feb 27, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i2.6323

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

Dr. Manuel Palomo Navarro
Medicina Intensiva, Hospital de Sagunto
Dr. Elena Parreño Rodríguez
Medicina Intensiva, Chairwoman of the departmental bioethics committee, Hospital de Sagunto

Abstract

Cardiac pacemaker therapies, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, have transformed the management of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure, improving patient outcomes. However, these therapies raise significant ethical challenges, including conflicts of interest in device selection, dilemmas in pacing mode choices, and decisions surrounding device deactivation at end-of-life. This article focuses on the interplay between ethical principles, patient autonomy, and resource allocation in these contexts, proposing practical solutions and exploring cultural and legal perspectives. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure patient-centered, ethically sound cardiac care.

Article Details

How to Cite
NAVARRO, Dr. Manuel Palomo; RODRÍGUEZ, Dr. Elena Parreño. Ethical Considerations in Cardiac Pacemaker Therapies. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, feb. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6323>. Date accessed: 17 mar. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i2.6323.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 13 No 2 (2025): Vol.13 issue 2 February 2025
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Benjamin MM, Sorkness CA. Practical and ethical considerations in the management of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator devices in terminally ill patients. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017;30(2):157-160. doi:10.1080/0899 8280.2017.11929566. PMID: 28405065; PMCID: PMC5349811.

2. Hutchison K, Sparrow R. Ethics and the cardiac pacemaker: more than just end-of-life issues. Europace. 2018;20(5):739-746. doi:10.1093/europ ace/eux019. PMID: 28387818.

3. Kay GN, Pelosi F. An ethical analysis of withdrawal of therapy in patients with implantable cardiac electronic devices: application of a novel decision algorithm. Linacre Q. 2013;80(4):308-316.

4. U.S. Sunshine Act. Disclosure of financial relationships between physicians and manufacturers. 2010.

5. Finkelstein A, et al. Ethical dilemmas in cardiac device therapy. J Med Ethics. 2019;45(3): 198-203.

6. Smith SJ, et al. The impact of industry influence on medical decisions in cardiology. Circulation. 2015;131(2):101-108.

7. Heart Rhythm Society, Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. Guidelines for management of pacing devices in terminal illness. Heart Rhythm Society. 2023.

8. European Society of Cardiology. ESC guidelines on the management of cardiac pacing. Eur Heart J. 2021.

9. American Heart Association. Ethical considerations in deactivating cardiac devices at end-of-life. AHA Statements. 2019.

10. European Society of Cardiology. ESC guidelines on the management of cardiac pacing. Eur Heart J. 2021.

11. Netherlands Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act. Netherlands Law. 2002.

12. Belgium Act on Euthanasia. Belgian Law. 2002.

13. Luxembourg Act of 16 March 2009 on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Luxembourg Law. 2009.

14. Catholic Bioethics Center. Ethical perspectives on end-of-life care in Catholic teachings. 2017.

15. Al-Jumaily H. Islamic perspectives on deactivating cardiac devices in end-of-life care. J Islamic Bioethics. 2020;14(2):85-91.

16. UK Department of Health. Ethical framework for end-of-life care. Department of Health and Social Care. 2018.

17. European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Guidelines on cardiac pacing and deactivation. Eur Heart J. 2021.

18. American Heart Association. Ethical considerations in pacemaker deactivation. AHA J. 2019.

19. Darnell L, Harris S. The role of ethics committees in end-of-life decisions. J Palliat Care. 2022;38(4):213-220.