Addressing Writing Deficiencies in Graduate Nursing Education: Strategies for Success

Main Article Content

Joyce E. Johnson, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAONL, FAAN Kevin M. Rulo, PhD, MA, BA Lesley S. McCorry, PhD, RN

Abstract

Graduate nursing programs face persistent challenges in addressing students' academic writing deficiencies, a critical skill for scholarly and professional success. Writing struggles often stem from undergraduate curricula emphasizing clinical competency over writing development, leaving students ill-prepared for the demands of graduate-level scholarship. These deficiencies hinder academic progression, limit contributions to evidence-based practice, and slow the advancement of nursing science. The surge in doctoral nursing program enrollment, boosted by calls from the 2011 Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the 2017 American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) for more nurses with advanced expertise, has amplified the urgency of addressing foundational writing skills in masters, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), and PhD programs33,34. In 2021, the AACN reported 394 DNP programs launched since 2017 with 40,834 enrolled students, emphasizing the scale of the issue33.


Writing challenges extend beyond nursing, affecting students across academic and professional disciplines. Increasingly, graduate faculty are burdened with teaching basic writing mechanics, diverting time and focus from course content. This trend underscores the need for innovative strategies to support writing development effectively. Notably, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools offers both promise and challenges in addressing writing deficiencies. AI-based grammar checkers, style editors, and newly-developed platforms provide immediate feedback and support revisions, but over-reliance on such tools may compromise critical thinking, originality, and independent writing skills. Therefore, academic programs must balance AI's benefits while maintaining academic integrity and fostering independent learning.


This article highlights the systemic nature of writing challenges in graduate nursing programs and presents a case study of an introductory course that incorporates comprehensive writing instruction and responsible AI use to bridge writing proficiency gaps. By embedding writing skills into the curriculum, and actively engaging faculty, nursing programs can equip students with the writing proficiency necessary for academic success and professional impact. Finally, a call to action underscores that nursing academia must lead systematic change to elevate writing proficiency, ensuring that graduates contribute meaningfully to their fields and the advancement of nursing science.

Keywords: Graduate nursing education, Academic writing proficiency, Writing pedagogy, Artificial intelligence in writing, Nursing curriculum development

Article Details

How to Cite
JOHNSON, Joyce E.; RULO, Kevin M.; MCCORRY, Lesley S.. Addressing Writing Deficiencies in Graduate Nursing Education: Strategies for Success. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, feb. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6338>. Date accessed: 16 mar. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i2.6338.
Section
Review Articles

References

1. Johnson JE, Goodman P. Graduate nursing students’ writing proficiency: Faculty perspectives and academic active inertia. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2023;13(7):7-14. doi:10.5430/jnep.v13n7p7.

2. Lyons R, Elmedni B. Writing issues and graduate education: Faculty and student perspectives. J Acad Perspect. 2015;7(2):41-52.

3. Johnson JE, Rulo K. (2021). Write! A Guide for Nursing Graduate Students and Professionals. DEStech Publications.

4. Johnson JE, Goodman P. Graduate nursing student scholarly writing: Improving writing proficiency. Med Res Arch. 2023;11(5).

5. Cooper A, Bikowski D. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? J Engl Acad Purposes. 2007;6(3):206-221.

6. Cone PH, Van Dover L. The graduate experience: Living with writing. J Nurs Educ. 2012;51(3):141-145.

7. Johnson JE, Rulo K. Problems in the profession: How and why writing skills must be improved. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35(1):57-64.

8. Oermann MH, Leonardelli AK, Turner KM, et al. Systematic review of educational programs and strategies for developing students’ and nurses’ writing skills. J Nurs Educ. 2015;54(1):28-34. doi:10.3928/01484834-20141224-01.

9. Lea MR, Street BV. The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory Pract. 2006;45 (4):368-377. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11.

10. Meadows DH. Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing; 2008.

11. Hallur A. Grammarly vs. WhiteSmoke vs. Ginger. Published 2022. Accessed January 25, 2025. https://bloggingx.com/grammarly-vs-whitesmoke-vs-ginger/.

12. Simmons A. Which is best? Ginger, Grammarly, or ProWriting Aid? Published 2023. Accessed January 25, 2025. https://prowritingaid.com/art/2361/-grammarly-vs-ginger-vs-prowritingaid.aspx.

13. Lyons R, Elmedni B. (2015). Writing issues and graduate education: Faculty and student perspectives. Journal of Academic Perspectives, 7(2), 41-52.

14. Johnson JE, Goodman P. Graduate nursing students' writing proficiency: Survey of faculty perspectives and academic active inertia. J Educ Pract. 2023;13(7).

15. Cafferella, RS, Barnett, BG. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39-52.

16. Williams J, Bizup J. Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace. 11th ed. Pearson; 2014.

17. Cooper A, Bikowski D. (2007). Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 206-221.

18. Kennedy P. Challenges in writing for publication: Perspectives from nursing journal editors. Nurs J Rev. 2014;31(2):45-49.

19. Holmes B, Waterbury T, Baltrinic E, Davis A. Angst about academic writing: Graduate students at the brink. Contemp Issues Educ Res. 2018; 11(2):65-70. doi:10.19030/cier.v11i2.10129.

20. Cu MA, Hochman S. (2023, January 22). Stanford students and professors alike are grappling with the rise of ChatGPT, a chatbot powered by artificial intelligence, and the technology’s implications for education. The Stanford Daily.

21. HelloScribe. The good, the bad, and the ugly of AI writing. HelloScribe website. Published April 26, 2023. Accessed November 30, 2024.

22. Tucker M. Our Students Can’t Write Very Well – It’s No Mystery Why. January 12, 2017. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-our-students-cant-write-very-well-its-no-mystery-why/2017/01.

23. Enhancing postgraduate digital academic writing proficiency. Taylor & Francis Online. Published January 24, 2025. Accessed January 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2025.2454445.

24. Kim TW, Tan Q. Repurposing Text-Generating AI into a Thought-Provoking Writing Tutor. arXiv. Published April 9, 2023. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10543

25. Woo DJ, Susanto H, Yeung CH, Guo K, Fung AKY. Exploring AI-Generated Text in Student Writing: How Does AI Help? arXiv. Published March 10, 2023. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02478

26. Jacob S, Tate T, Warschauer M. Emergent AI-Assisted Discourse: Case Study of a Second Language Writer Authoring with ChatGPT. arXiv. Published October 17, 2023. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10903

27. Study Finds Generative AI Significantly Boosts Graduate-Level Writing Efficiency and Quality. Carnegie Mellon University. Published September 2024. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://www.heinz.cmu.edu/media/2024/September/study-finds-generative-ai-significantly-boosts-graduate-level-writing-efficiency-and-quality

28. The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of student essays. Taylor & Francis Online. Published July 2023. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

29. Naber J, Wyatt TH. Reflective writing interventions and critical thinking in nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):139-144.

30. Generative AI's Impact on Graduate Student Writing Productivity and Quality. SSRN. Published October 2024. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4941022

31. Incorporating Generative AI Into the Writing Process For Students. Montana State University. Published April 2024. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://www.montana.edu/facultyexcellence/teaching-advising/genai/writing.html

32. AI & Student Writing. Center for Educational Effectiveness, UC Davis. Published March 2024. Accessed January 26, 2025. https://cee.ucdavis.edu/ai-student-writing

33. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. AACN fact sheet – DNP. Published 2018. Accessed January 25, 2025. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Factsheets/DNP-Factsheet.pdf.

34. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. The National Academies Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/12956.