Perception of time perspective in the first year after the loss of a loved one

Main Article Content

Larysa Rybyk, Ph.D Volodymyr Medvedev

Abstract

Background: This study examines the perception of time perspective in individuals who have experienced the loss of a loved one due to military conflict. It explores the disruption of subjective time perception and its psychological implications in the grieving process. The study distinguishes between expected deaths due to illness and sudden losses caused by military actions or other external factors. It further analyses the impact of time perspective imbalance on grief adaptation, based on Philip Zimbardo’s Time Perspective Theory.


Methods: A study was conducted in 2024 among Ukrainians, involving 64 – 63 were women, and one was a man, aged between 22 and 64 years. Statistical methods, including ANOVA, descriptive statistics and comparative analysis, were applied using Jamovi software to determine significant differences in time perception across groups.


Results: Respondents grieving for up to six months showed strong future focus (M=3.74), reflecting emotional ties to shared plans. Those in the 6–12 month period exhibited deep distress with negative past perception but retained positive memories. In the 1–5 year group, both negative and positive past factors (M=3.16) and high future orientation (M=3.48) suggested reminiscence or escapism. After five years, respondents had a balanced time perception with reduced fatalism. Loss type also influenced grief: the highest negative past perception was among those who lost loved ones to suicide (M=3.57) or drugs (M=3.70), while battlefield losses correlated with strong future focus (M=3.59) and the lowest fatalistic present scores (M=2.52).


Conclusion: This pilot study examined the perception of time perspective among individuals who experienced the sudden loss of a loved one during military conflict, identifying significant differences based on the duration and type of loss, with findings suggesting that adaptation over time leads to a more balanced perception of the past, present, and future. Future research should explore how age, family relationships, and attachment to the deceased influence mourners' time perspective in both short- and long-term contexts.

Keywords: time perspective, military losses, loss of a loved one, grief experience, perception of time perspective, time perspective theory, losses in wartime conditions

Article Details

How to Cite
RYBYK, Larysa; MEDVEDEV, Volodymyr. Perception of time perspective in the first year after the loss of a loved one. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, feb. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6359>. Date accessed: 16 mar. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i2.6359.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Meier EA, Gallegos JV, Thomas LP, Depp CA, Irwin SA, Jeste DV. Defining a good death (successful dying): Literature Review and a call for research and public dialogue. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2016;24(4):261-271. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2016.01.135

2. Kristensen P, Weisæth L, Heir T. Bereavement and mental health after sudden and violent losses: A Review. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes. 2012;75(1):76-97. doi:10.1521/psyc.2012.75.1.76

3. Charlson F, van Ommeren M, Flaxman A, Cornett J, Whiteford H, Saxena S. New who prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2019;394(10194):240-248. doi:10.101 6/s0140-6736(19)30934-1

4. Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, et al. Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety. 2011;28(2):103-117. doi: 10.1002/da.20780

5. Wörn J, Comijs H, Aartsen M. Spousal Loss and Change in Cognitive Functioning: An Examination of Temporal Patterns and Gender Differences. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020;75(1):195-206. doi:10.1093/geronb/gby104

6. Vable AM, Subramanian SV, Rist PM, Glymour MM. Does the “widowhood effect” precede spousal bereavement? results from a nationally representative sample of older adults. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2015;23 (3):283-292. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.05.004

7. Bellet BW, LeBlanc NJ, Nizzi M-C, et al. Identity confusion in complicated grief: A closer look. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2020;129(4):397-407. doi:10.1037/abn0000520

8. Rybyk LA, Sandal O, Honcharenko KS, et al. Perception of time perspective in widows of law enforcement officers during the first year after the loss. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2021;74(11):2733-2737. doi:10.36740/wlek202111109

9. Shear K, Monk T, Houck P, et al. An attachment-based model of complicated grief including the role of avoidance. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2007;257(8):453-461. doi:10.1007/s00406-007-0745-z

10. Schore AN. Affect Regulation and the Origin of The Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994

11. Sagbakken M, Bregård IM, Varvin S. The past, the present, and the future: A qualitative study exploring how refugees’ experience of time influences their mental health and well-being. Frontiers in Sociology. 2020;5:46. doi:10.3389/fsoc.2020.00046

12. Maciejewski PK, Falzarano FB, She WJ, Lichtenthal WG, Prigerson HG. A micro-sociological theory of adjustment to loss. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022;43:96-101. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.016

13. Saltzman LY, Terzis L. Psychological predictors of the time perspective: The role of posttraumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic growth, and temporal triggers in a sample of bereaved adults. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298445

14. Suddendorf T, Corballis MC. Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1997;123(2):133-167.

15. Tulving E. Chronesthesia: Conscious Awareness of Subbjective Time. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT. Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. Oxford University Press; 2002;311–325.

16. Schacter DL, Addis DR. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Constructive Memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007;3 62(1481):773-786. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087

17. Maddi SR. The story of hardiness: Twenty Years of theorizing, research, and practice. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 2002;5 4(3):175-185. doi:10.1037//1061-4087.54.3.175

18. Maddi SR. On the problem of accepting facticity and pursuing possibility. In: Messer SB, Sass LA, Woolfolk RL. Hermeneutics and psychological theory: Interpretive perspectives on personality, psychotherapy, and psychopathology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1988:182-209

19. Menzies RG, Menzies RE. Emotional pain and suffering: The search for global solutions. In: Rhodes P. Beyond the psychology industry: How else might we heal? Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020:11–22. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33762-9_2

20. Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J, Solomon S. A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of Terror Management Theory. Psychological Review. 1999;106(4):835-845. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.835

21. Yanovskaya S, Turenko R, Kononenko N, Bilous N, Timchenko V. To the question of attitude to death of middle-aged people during the war in Ukraine. Visnyk of VN. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Psychology. 2022;(73):75-83. doi:10.26565/2225-7756-2022-73-09

22. Solomon S, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T. A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Published online 1991:93-159. doi:10. 1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7

23. Heller DK. Mental health in the shadow of the holocaust: Psychological interventions in Jewish displaced persons camps. Journal of Contemporary History. 2023;59(3):471-491. doi:10.1177/0022009 4231219273

24. Frounfelker R, Gilman SE, Betancourt TS, et al. Civilians in World War II and DSM-IV mental disorders: Results from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2018;53(2):207-219. doi:10.1007/s 00127-017-1452-3

25. Chandler M. Surviving time: The persistence of identity in this culture and that. Culture and Psychology. 2000;6(2):209-231. doi:10.1177/1354 067x0062009

26. Habermas T, Köber C. Autobiographical reasoning in life narratives buffers the effect of biographical disruptions on the sense of self-continuity. Memory. 2015;23(5):664-674. doi:10.10 80/09658211.2014.920885

27. Alonso MA, Schweiger Gallo I, Hervás G. An exploratory study based on autobiographical memories and Character Strengths. Psychological Studies. 2024;69(3):296-306. doi:10.1007/s12646-024-00796-0

28. Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;77(6):1271-1288. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1271

29. Senyk O. Adaptation of Philip Zimbardo's Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Social Psychology. 2012;1-2(51-52):153-168.

30. Open statistical software for the desktop and cloud (no date) jamovi. Available at: https://jamovi.org/ Accessed 12 December 2024.

31. R Core Team [Computer software]. Version 4.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.

32. Hobfoll SE, Watson P, Bell CC, et al. Five essential elements of immediate and mid–term mass trauma intervention: Empirical evidence. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes. 2007;70(4):283-315. doi:10.1521/psyc.2007.70.4.283

33. Feigelman W, Gorman BS, Jordan JR. Stigmatization and suicide bereavement. Death Studies. 2009;33 (7):591-608. doi:10.1080/07481180902979973

34. Malyshev V. The spread of drug addiction – a threat to Ukraine's national security: Some ways to solve the problem. Holos Ukrainy. 2011;May 25:4.

35. Jones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths RD, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder-related symptoms in relatives of patients following intensive care. Intensive Care Medicine. 2004;30(3):456-460. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2149-5

36. Halbwachs M. On Collective Memory. University of Chicago Press; 1992.

37. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Target article: “posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.” Psychological Inquiry. 20 04;15(1):1-18. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01

38. Parkes MC, Brown RJ. Health after bereavement. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1972;34(5):449-461. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197209000-00008

39. Hirschberger G. Collective trauma and the social construction of meaning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01441

40. Grief, bereavement, and coping with loss (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Published 2024. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26389487/ Accessed December 11, 2024.

41. Neimeyer RA, Baldwin SA, Gillies J. Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: Mitigating complications in bereavement. Death Studies. 200 6;30(8):715-738. doi:10.1080/07481180600848322

42. Boss P. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief. Harvard University Press;1999.

43. Bryan CJ, Rudd MD, Wertenberger E. Association of combat exposure with suicide risk among US military personnel and veterans. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(1):49-57.

44. Shay J. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character. Atheneum Publishers/Macmillan Publishing Co;1994.

45. Figley CR. Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those Who Treat the Traumatized. Routledge;1995.

46. Fogarty B, Houghton S, Galavan E, O’Súilleabháin PS. Clinicians’ experience of collaboration in the treatment of suicidal clients within the collaborative assessment and management of Suicidality Framework. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 2021;87(2): 424-447. doi:10.1177/00302228211020579