Saying YES to Careers in Cancer Research: A Collaborative Model for Evaluating and Improving a Cancer Education and Research Program
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Case Comprehensive Cancer Center’s Youth Enjoy Science (YES) Program is funded by the National Cancer Institute to promote broad interest in pursuing a career in biomedical research via early intervention strategies that inspire student interest, help envision research as a career path, and strengthen practical research and career skills. A major aspect of the YES program is an 8-week immersion into cancer center faculty laboratories to conduct a cancer research project over the summer. The overall goal is to excite students to consider a future career in biomedical research or healthcare to enhance the future cancer-focused workforce. To ensure the YES program is meeting its goals and providing an exceptional experience for students, an external evaluation team performs an annual evaluation that incorporates a mixed methods approach combining mechanisms for formal and informal feedback. The team shares key insights with program leadership, faculty, and student representatives to ensure that all feedback directly informs program adjustments. This approach emphasizes actionable results rather than passive data collection, reinforcing the program's commitment to continuous quality improvement. Formal surveys suggest the program has been consistently meeting its goals of increasing student understanding of cancer biology and research. However, a recent reduction in survey response rates makes it challenging to determine whether survey respondents are primarily those with the most positive experiences. Integrating both formal and informal feedback mechanisms in program evaluation is essential for capturing the full range of student experiences. Thus, it is critical that training programs provide a channel for informal discussions. The YES program coordinator maintains close relationships with all stakeholders and is deeply familiar with student participants, from the application process to ongoing program activities. As an approachable and engaged leader, the coordinator effectively gathers feedback and implements changes to enhance program performance. In response to formal and informal feedback, the YES program curriculum has been modified to enhance not only student and mentor experiences but also the process for soliciting feedback in the future.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Jones HP. Training the Next Generation of Health Equity Researchers: Exploring STEM Pathways and Best Practices. Ethn Dis. Winter 2020;30(1):1-4. doi:10.18865/ed.30.1.1
3. Rivers R, Norris KC, Hui G, et al. The NIDDK High School Short-Term Research Experience for Underrepresented Persons. Ethn Dis. Winter 2020;30(1):5-14. doi:10.18865/ed.30.1.5
4. Kitchen JA, Chen C, Sonnert G, Sadler P. The Impact of Participating in College-Run STEM Clubs and Programs on Students’ STEM Career Aspirations. Teachers College Record. 2022;124(2):117-142. doi:10.1177/01614681221086445
5. Kim C, Preston K, Jr., Braga A, Fankhauser SC. Increasing Student Confidence in Writing: Integrating Authentic Manuscript Writing into an Online 8-Week Research Program. J Microbiol Biol Educ. Apr 2023;24(1). doi:10.1128/jmbe.00199-22
6. Miller K, Sonnert G, Sadler PM. The Influence of Student Enrollment in Pre-College Engineering Courses on Their Interest in Engineering Careers. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER). 2020;10(1) (Article 7). doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1235
7. Byars-Winston AM, Branchaw J, Pfund C, Leverett P, Newton J. Culturally Diverse Undergraduate Researchers' Academic Outcomes and Perceptions of Their Research Mentoring Relationships. Int J Sci Educ. 2015;37(15):2533-2554. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1085133
8. Delaloye N, Blank L, Ware D, et al. Evaluating the Impact of Authentic Research on Secondary Student Self-efficacy and Future Scientific Possible Selves. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 2018;13(9):737-746.
9. Miller K, Gerhard S, and Sadler P. The influence of students’ participation in STEM competitions on their interest in STEM careers. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. 2018/04/03 2018;8(2):95-114. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1397298
10. Smith KN, Jaeger AJ, Thomas D. “Science Olympiad Is Why I’m Here”: the Influence of an Early STEM Program on College and Major Choice. Research in Science Education. 2021/09/01 2021;51(1):443-459. doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09897-7
11. Junk DJ, Berger NA. Teach to Beat Cancer: An Integral Component of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Youth Enjoy Science Program. J STEM Outreach. Aug 2022;5(2). doi:10.15695/jstem/v5i2.05
12. Omoijuanfo EO, Williams JT, Qua K, et al. Disparities Education Strategies in the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center STEM Focused Youth Enjoy Science Program. J STEM Outreach. Aug 2022;5(2). doi:10.15695/jstem/v5i2.07
13. Qua K, Haider R, Junk DJ, Berger NA. Sustaining Student Engagement - Successes and Challenges of a Virtual STEM Program for High School Students. J STEM Outreach. Aug 2021;4(3). doi:10.15695/jstem/v4i3.09
14. Qua K, Pinkard O, Kundracik EC, Ramirez-Bergeron D, Berger NA. Near Peer Mentors to Address Socio-Emotional Issues Among Underrepresented Minority High School Students in Research Intensive STEM Programs: Perceptions of Students and Mentors. J STEM Outreach. 2020;3(1). doi:10.15695/jstem/v3i1.06
15. Estrada M, Hernandez PR, Schultz PW. A Longitudinal Study of How Quality Mentorship and Research Experience Integrate Underrepresented Minorities into STEM Careers. CBE Life Sci Educ. Spring 2018;17(1). doi:10.1187/cbe.17-04-0066
16. Sahin A, Gulacar O, Stuessy C. High School Students’ Perceptions of the Effects of International Science Olympiad on Their STEM Career Aspirations and Twenty-First Century Skill Development. Research in Science Education. 2015/12/01 2015;45(6):785-805. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9439-5
17. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Second Edition. SAGE Publications. 2011:488p.
18. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Fourth Edition. Sage publications. 2014:832p.
19. Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A. Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and Accountability. Second Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc. 2015:392p. doi:10.4135/9781483387079
20. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation. Fourth Edition. Sage publications. 2008:688p.
21. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1989;11(3):255-274. doi:10.3102/01623737011003255
22. O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. Sep 2014;89(9):1245-51. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388
23. Society AC. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024. American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2024/2024-cancer-facts-and-figures-acs.pdf
24. Council C. Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. ERIC. 2007.
25. STEM Education for the Future: A Visioning Report. Directorate ASotACotEHR. 2020. https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/STEM-Education-2020-Visioning-Report-r.pdf?VersionId=xSgoNIP8GuJOsAkrmO4nWfqAKvd0Gfmf
26. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Call to Action for Science Education: Building Opportunity for the Future. The National Academies Press. 2021:76. doi:10.17226/26152
27. Kallison Jr JM, and Stader DL. Effectiveness of Summer Bridge Programs in Enhancing College Readiness. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 2012/05/01 2012;36(5):340-357. doi:10.1080/10668920802708595
28. Chiappinelli KB, Moss BL, Lenz DS, et al. Evaluation to Improve a High School Summer Science Outreach Program. J Microbiol Biol Educ. May 2016;17(2):225-36. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.1003
29. Papadimitriou M. High School Students' Perceptions of Their Internship Experiences and the Related Impact on Career Choices and Changes. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development. 2014;7:8.
30. Akosah-Twumasi P, Emeto TI, Lindsay D, Tsey K, Malau-Aduli BS. A Systematic Review of Factors That Influence Youths Career Choices—the Role of Culture. Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education. 2018-July-19 2018;3. doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00058
31. Tenenbaum LS, Anderson MK, Jett M, Yourick DL. An Innovative Near-Peer Mentoring Model for Undergraduate and Secondary Students: STEM Focus. Innovative Higher Education. 2014/11/01 2014;39(5):375-385. doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9286-3
32. Rakhshkhorshid M, Navaee M, Nouri N, Safarzaii F. The Association of Health Literacy with Breast Cancer Knowledge, Perception and Screening Behavior. Eur J Breast Health. Jul 2018;14(3):144-147. doi:10.5152/ejbh.2018.3757
33. Stuckelman J, Zavatchen SE, Jones SA. The Evolving Role of the Program Coordinator: Five Essential Skills for the Coordinator Toolbox. Academic Radiology. 2017;24(6):725-729. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.021