Situation Awareness – Bridging Neuroscientific and Human Factors/Ergonomics Perspectives and Implications for Clinical Practice

Main Article Content

Stavros Prineas

Abstract

A key challenge for clinicians is to make sufficient sense of what is happening around them to anticipate what might happen next and take timely action. This review article examines the theoretical basis of Situation Awareness (SA) - defined by Endsley as “the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning and a projection of their status in the near future” (SA Levels I, II and III respectively) – and its relevance to clinical practice. SA is fundamental to good decision-making, and in turn to safe and effective human performance. Traditional models of clinical history taking / examination / investigation / diagnosis / prognosis align with the basic components of SA and can be further refined when viewed through the prism of SA, and its scope further extended by incorporating psychological, neurocognitive and statistical (Bayesian) perspectives.


 


Stress, fatigue and environmental noise/distractions can significantly impair SA, while other factors can significantly improve it. Experts experience a different perceptual world to novices, and techniques that may accelerate the acquisition of expert clinical SA (e.g. deliberate reflection, simulation, ergonomic environmental design etc.) could be beneficial to clinical practice. Moreover one can distinguish individual SA from ‘shared’ and ‘team’ SA, where specific communication, teamworking and leadership skills become relevant. Clinical emergencies and crises usually entail greater urgency, ambiguity, volatility and uncertainty, and impose a greater challenge on clinicians to form adequate SA in real time. Examples of SA in everyday clinical practice and the extent to which SA can be improved by adapting the clinician (through training) and/or adapting the work environment (through workplace/organisational design) are discussed.

Keywords: Situation Awareness, Neuroscience, Cognition, Human Factors, Ergonomics, Medical Education, Patient Safety

Article Details

How to Cite
PRINEAS, Stavros. Situation Awareness – Bridging Neuroscientific and Human Factors/Ergonomics Perspectives and Implications for Clinical Practice. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 4, apr. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6457>. Date accessed: 15 may 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i4.6457.
Section
Review Articles

References

1. Tzu S. The Art of War. Giles L Translation of 5th Century BCE manuscript. Available at
https://dn790006.ca.archive.org/0/items/TheArtOfWarBySunTzu/ArtOfWar.pdf 2004; 4:18

2. Von Clausewitz C. Vom Kriege (On War). Graham JJ Translation of 1874 Edition. Project Gutenberg. Available at
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1946/1946-h/1946-h.htm retrieved 20 March 2025

3. Endsley MR. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. 1988; 97-101.

4. Endsley MR. Situation Awareness. In Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (5th Ed.) Salvendy G, Karwowski W. Eds. 2021; Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119636113.ch17.

5. Hughes C, Pain C, Braithwaite J, Hillman K. 'Between the flags': implementing a rapid response system at scale. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 23(9): 714-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002845

6. Tobin AE, Santamaria JD. Medical emergency teams are associated with reduced mortality across a major metropolitan health network after two years service: a retrospective study using government administrative data. Crit Care 2012; 16: R210. doi:10.1186/cc11843

7. Ganguly K, Poo M. Activity Dependent Neural Plasticity from Bench to Bedside. Neuron 2013;80: 729-41

8. Agilari E, Aquaro M, Barra A, Fachechi A, Marullo C. From Pavlov Conditioning to Hebbian Learning. Neural Comput 2023; 35(5): 930-57. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01578

9. Maguire EA, Spiers HJ, Good CD, Hartley T, Frackwiak RS, Burgess N. Navigation expertise and the human hippocampus: a structural brain imaging study. Hippocampus 2003; 13(2): 250-9. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10087

10. Wang G, Grone B, Colas D, Applebaum L, Mourrain P. Synaptic plasticity in sleep: learning homeostasis and disease. Trends Neurosci 2011; 34(9): 452-463. Doi:10/1016/j.tins.2011.07.005

11. Heraclitus. Fragment DK B91. Hoyt R Ed. The Fragments of Heraclitus. Available at
https://heraclitusfragments.com/B91/index.html retrieved 20 Mar 2025

12. Box G. Science and Statistics. J Am Stat Ass 1976; 71(356): 791-799

13. Ghosh VE, Gilboa, A. What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature. Neuropsychologia 2014 53: 104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.010

14. Vatansever D, Menon DK, Emmanuel A. Stamatakis EA. Default mode contributions to automated information processing. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2017; 114 (48): 12821-12826. doi: 10.1073/pna s.1710521114

15. Cisek P. Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement. Attent Percept Psychophys. 2019; 81: 2265–2287. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01760-1

16. Bennett MS. What Behavioral Abilities Emerged at Key Milestones in Human Brain Evolution? 13 Hypotheses on the 600-Million-Year Phylogenetic History of Human Intelligence. Front Psychol 2021; 12:685853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.6 85853

17. Graciano MSA. Rethinking Consciousness – A Scientific Theory of Subjective Experience. WW Norton Pubs. 2019

18. Loeb GE, Fishel JA. Bayesian Action & Perception: Representing the World in the Brain. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00 341

19. Nour MM, Nour JM. Perception, Illusions and Bayesian Inference. Psychopathology 2015; 48(4); 217-221. doi: 10.1159/000437271

20. Born RT, Bencomo G. Illusions, Delusions and your Backwards, Bayesian Brain: A Biased Visual Perspective. Brain Behav Evol 2020; 95(5) 272-285. doi:10.1159/000514859

21. Bruckmaier G, Krauss S, Binder K, Hilbet S, Brunner B. Tversky and Kahneman’s Cognitive Illusions: Who Can Solve Them, and Why? Front Psychol 2021; 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584689

22. Friston K. The history of the future of the Bayesian brain. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 1230-1233 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.004

23. Hipólito I, Kirchhoff M. Breaking Boundaries: the Bayesian Brain Hypothesis for perception and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition 2023; Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2023.103510

24. von Helmholtz, H. Concerning the perceptions in general, 3rd Ed. Treatise on Physiological Optics, Vol. III (Translated by J. P. C. Southall 1925 of the 1866 manuscript; reprinted New York: Dover, 1962.) Opt Soc Am 1925;26:4.. Available at
https://archive.org/details/helmholtzstreati0003jame/page/338/mode/2up retrieved 27 Mar 2025

25. Sox HC Jr. Probability theory in the use of diagnostic tests. An introduction to critical study of the literature. Ann Intern Med 1986 Jan;104(1):60-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-1-60.

26. Krauss S Wang XT. The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser J Exp Psychol Gen 2003 Mar;132(1):3-22. doi: 10.103 7/0096-3445.132.1.3.

27. Simons DJ, Chabris CF. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 1999; 28: 1059-1074. doi:10.1068/p28 1059

28. Simons D. Selective Attention Test (video). Available at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJG698U2Mvo retrieved 16 Mar 2025

29. Quirkology. Colour Changing Card Trick (video). Available at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3iPrBrGSJM retrieved 16 Mar 2025

30. Potié A, Roelants F, Pospiech A, Momeni M, Watremez C. Hypnosis in the Perioperative Management of Breast Cancer Surgery: Clinical Benefits and Potential Implications. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2016:2942416. doi: 10.1155/2016/2942416.

31. Fusco N, Bernard F, Roelants F, Watremez C, Musellec H, Laviolle B, Beloeil H. Hypnosis and communication reduce pain and anxiety in peripheral intravenous cannulation: Effect of Language and Confusion on Pain During Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization (KTHYPE), a multicentre randomised trial. BJA 2020;124(3):292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2 019.11.020

32. Slater P, Van-Manen A, Cyna AM. Clinical hypnosis and the anaesthetist: a practical approach. BJA Education 2024; 24(4): 121e128. doi: 10.1016/j.b jae.2024.01.005

33. Klein G. Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors 2008; 50(3): 456–60. doi:10.1518/0018720 08X288385

34. Klein GA. A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE, editors. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing; 1993; 138–47.

35. Klein G. Sources of Power: How people make decisions. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. 1998

36. Engel PJH Tacit knowledge and visual expertise in medical diagnostic reasoning: Implications for medical education. Medical Teacher 2008; 30: e184-e188 doi:10.1080/0142159080214 4260

37. Waag WL, Bell HH. Situation assessment and decision making in skilled fighter pilots. In Zsambok, CE, Klein, G. Naturalistic decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 1997: 247–54.

38. Dominguez CO. Expertise and metacognition in laparoscopic surgery: a field study. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 45th Annual Meeting, Minneapolis/St. Paul; 2001:1298–303.

39. Gladwell M. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York, NY: Little Brown and Company Pubs. 2008

40. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich P, et al., editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2006Nakayama

41. Gao Q, Hartwig MG. Commentary: Are 10000 hours really the key to adult learning? Perhaps not. JTCVS Open 2021;8: 688-9. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.20 21.09.009

42. Wong NC. The 10000-hour rule. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9(9-10):299. doi:10.5489/cuaj.3267

43. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79(10 Suppl): S70-81.

44. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15(11):988-94.

45. Eriksson KA, Harwell KW. Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 2386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396

46. Flack J. Situation Awareness: Proceed With Caution. Human Factors 1995; 37(1) : 149-57. doi: 10.1518/001872095779049480

47. Endsley MR. A taxonomy of Situation Awareness Errors. In: Fuller R, Johnston N, McDonald N, Eds. Human Factors in Aviation Operations. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. 1995; 287–92.

48. Schulz CM, Krautheim V, Hackemann A, Kreuzer M, Kochs EF, Wagner KJ. Situation awareness errors in anesthesia and critical care in 200 cases of a critical incident reporting system. BMC Anesthesiol 2016;16:4 doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0172-7

49. Prineas S, Mosier, K, Mirko C, Giuccardi S. Non-Technical Skills in Healthcare. Donaldson L, Riccardi W, Sheridan S, Tartaglia R Eds. In: Textbook of Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management. Cham (CH): Springer; 2021. Chapter 30. 2020.

50. Killgore WDS. Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition. Prog Brain Res 2010; 185:105-29

51. Rogers AE. The Effects of Fatigue and Sleepiness on Nurse Performance and Patient Safety. Chapter in Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2651/ retrieved 16 Mar 2025

52. Tawfik DS, Profit J, Morgenthaler TI, Tutty MA, West CP, Shanfelt TD. Physician Burnout, Wellbeing, and Work Unit Safety Grades in Relationship to Reported Medical Errors. Mayo Clin Proc 2018; 93(11): 1571–80.

53. Rivera AJ, Tarsh B-T. Interruptions and Distractions in Healthcare: Review and Reappraisal. Qual Saf Health Care . 2010 August ; 19(4): 304–312. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.033282.

54. Young JQ, Ranji SR, Wachter RM, Lee CM, Niehaus B. “July Effect”: Impact of the Academic Year-End Changeover on Patient Outcomes – A Systematic Review. Ann Int Med 2011; 155(5):309-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-5-201109060-00354

55. Jane Ferguson J, Stringer G, Walshe K, Allen T, Grigoroglou Ashcroft DM, Kontopantelis E. Locum doctor working and quality and safety: a qualitative study in English primary and secondary care. BMJ Qual Saf 2024; 33: 354–362. doi:10.113 6/bmjqs-2023-016699

56. Baverstock A, Finlay F. Take a break: HALT—are you Hungry, Angry, Late or Tired? ADC Ed Prac 2019;104:200. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317209

57. Gaba DM, Fish KJ Howard SK. Crisis management in Anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1994; 24-33

58. Yentis S. Of humans, factors, failings and fixations. Anaesthesia 2009;65(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1 365-2044.2009.06018.x

59. Harmer M. The Case of Elaine Bromiley: Independent Review of the care given to Mrs Elaine Bromiley on 29 March 2005. Available at
https://emcrit.org/wp-content/uploads/ElaineBromileyAnonymousReport.pdf retrieved 22 March 2025.

60. Matthews WJ, Meck WH. Time perception: the bad news and the good. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014,
5:429–446. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1298

61. Schonger M, Sele D. Intuition and exponential growth: bias and the roles of parameterization and complexity. Math Semesterber (2021) 68:221–235. doi:10.1007/s00591-021-00306-7

62. Kuhlenschmidt KM, Choi E, Moonmoon K, Blackwell J, Comish PB, Balentine C, Grant J, Park C, Dultz LA, Shoultz, Cripps MW, Dumas Ryan P. Provider Perception of Time During Trauma Resuscitation: A Prospective Quantitative Trauma Video Review Analysis. J Surg Res 2022 Jun:274: 207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.048. Epub 2022 Feb 18

63. Kaber DB, Endsley MR. Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Proc Safety Progress 1997; 16(3): 126-31. doi:10.1002/prs.608160304

64. Gouraud J, Delrome A, Berberian B. Autopilot, Mind Wandering, and the Out of the Loop Performance Problem. Front Neurosci 2017; 11. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00541

65. Ruskin KJ, Ruskin AC, O’Connor M. Automation failures and patient safety. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33(6): 788-92. DOI: 10.1097/AC O.0000000000000935

66. Endsley MR, Jones WM. A model of inter and intra-team situation awareness: implications for design, training and measurement. In: McNeese M, Salas E, Endsley MR Eds. New trends in cooperative activities: understanding system dynamics in complex environments. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2001;1–24.

67. Wright MC, Ensley MR. Building Shared Situation Awareness in Healthcare Settings. In Nemeth CP Ed. Improving Healthcare Team Communication. London: Routledge. 2017. doi: 10.1201/9781315588056

68. Skog A, Peyre SE, Pozner CN, Thorndike M, Hicks G, Dellaripa PF. Assessing Physician Leadership Styles: Application of the Situational Leadership Model to Transitions in Patient Acuity. Teach Learn Med 2012; 24(3): 225-30. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2 012.692269

69. Cooper S, Wakelam A. Leadership of resuscitation teams: “Lighthouse Leadership”. Resuscitation 1999; 42:27–45. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00080-5

70. Weller JM, Mahajan R, Fahey-Williams K, Webster CS. Teamwork matters: team situation awareness to build high-performing healthcare teams, a narrative review. BJA 2024; 132(4): 771-778. doi: 10/1016/j.bja.2023.12.035

71. Fioratou E, Flin R, Glavin R, Patey R. Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia. BJA 2010; 105(1): 83-90. doi: 10.1093/b ja/aeq137

72. Carayon P, Wooldridge A, Hoonakker P, Schoofs-Hundt A, Kelly MM. SEIPS 3.0: Human-Centered Design of the Patient Journey for Patient Safety. App Ergon 2020; 84: 103033. doi:10.1016/j.a pergo.2019.103033

73. Youssef SC, Haram K, Noel J, Patel V, Porter J, Dagupta P. Evolution of the digital operating room: the place of video technology in surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 2023; 408: 95. doi:10.100 7/s00423-023-02830-7

74. Stichler JF, Feiler JL. Ergonomics in Healthcare Facility Design, Part 1: Patient Care Areas. JONA 2011; 41(2): 49-51. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182 0592e6

75. Feiler JL, Stichler JF. Ergonomics in Healthcare Facility Design, Part 2: Support Areas. JONA 2011; 41(3): 97-99. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31820c72a1

76. Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA. Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. Appl Ergon 2008; 39(3): 271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002

77. Ward M, Sujan M, Pool R, Preston K, Huang H, Carrington A, Chozos N. Integrating Human-Centred AI into Clinical Practice. Available at https://ergonomics.org.uk/resource/integrating-human-centred-ai-in-clinical-practice.html retrieved 16 Mar 2025

78. Leong KBMSL,Hanskamp-Sebregts M, van der Wal RA, Wolff AP. Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e018367. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367

79. Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Teaching clinical handover with ISBAR. BMC Medical Education 2020; 20(Suppl 2):459. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02285-0

80. Skegg E, McElroy C, Mudgway M, Hamill J. Debriefing to improve interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: A systematic review. J Nurs Scholarship 2023; 55: 1179-88. doi: 10.1111/jnu.1 2924

81. Mitchell SA, Boyer TJ. Deliberate Practice in Medical Simulation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554558/ retrieved 26 Mar 2025

82. Endsley MR. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Objective Measures of Situation Awareness: A Comparison of SAGAT and SPAM. Human Factors 2021; 63(1): 124-50. doi: 10.1177/0 018720819875376

83. Coolen E, Draaisma J, Loeffen J. Measuring situation awareness and team effectiveness in pediatric acute care by using the situation global assessment technique. Eur J Paed 2019; 178: 837-850. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03358-z

84. Jonsson K, Brulin C, Härgestam M, Lindkvist M, Hultin M. Do team and task performance improve after training situation awareness? A randomized controlled study of interprofessional intensive care teams. Scand J Trauma Res Em Med 2021; 29:73. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00878-2

85. Hunter J, Porter M, Williams B. A novel study of situational awareness among out-of-hospital providers during an online clinical simulation. Australas Emerg Care 2023; 26: 96-103

86. Hogan MP, Pace DE, Hapgood J, Boone DC. Use of Human Patient Simulation and the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique in Practical Trauma Skills Assessment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2006; 61(5): 1047-1052. doi: 10.1097/01.t a.0000238687.23622.89

87. Zimmermann C, Fridrich A, Schwappach DL. Training Situational Awareness for Patient Safety in a Room of Horrors: An Evaluation of a Low-Fidelity Simulation Method. J Pat Safety 2021; 17 (8): e1026-e1033. doi: 10.1097/PTS.000000000 0000806

88. Jaffe, R, Zavodnick, J, Papanagnou, D, Zhang, XC, Diemer, G. Patient Safety Escape Room: A Team Simulation in Recognizing and Reporting Patient Safety Hazards. Am J Med Qual 2022; 37 (2):166-172 doi:10.1097/01.JMQ.0000753252.299 33.8d