Postgraduate Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards Class Management Between Degree Levels and among Academic Grades
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Effective class management is important for educational activities and helps to enhance the learning outcomes. However, information about the attitude of postgraduate students towards the class management in China is limited. We aimed to have a better understanding of the students’ perceptions and behavior intentions of class management.
Methods: A large-scale questionnaire survey among postgraduate students at West China School of Medicine of Sichuan University was performed to collect students’ opinions on class attendance, digital device use, examination assessment method, and class size. A comparison was made between master’s and doctoral degrees and across different academic grade levels.
Results: A total of 823 medical students finally participated the survey and completed the questionary. Of these participants, there were 175 doctoral students and 648 master’s students. There was a higher prevalence of punctuality issue in the higher-grade students. A greater number of master’s students came late or left early for classes mainly due to the conflicts with their clinical work or duty schedules, whereas more doctoral students claimed that managing experimental tasks was their main reason for such behavior. Compared with master’s students, a higher proportion of doctoral students supported that reason for using electronic devices in class was to complete scientific tasks. In terms of the examination assessment method, the majority of students preferred an open-book exam or essay-based assessments. Additionally, both high-grade and doctoral students showed a preference for smaller class sizes.
Conclusions: The attitude towards class management differed across different academic grades and between master’s and doctoral degrees. Future medical education should carefully balance study, clinical work, and scientific research, and also encourage student to engage in the class management.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Liu X, Feng J, Liu C, et al. Medical Education Systems in China: Development, Status, and Evaluation. Acad Med. Jan 1 2023;98(1):43-49. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004919
3. Development NCfHPE. 2022 Survey on the Training and Development of Clinical Medicine Students in China. Accessed 2025-03-01, 2025. https://medu.bjmu.edu.cn/cms/show.action?code=publish_4028801e6bb6cf11016be526c0dc0014&siteid=100000&newsid=8a317c95801a48ab9bf73f5d023baf2b&channelid=0000000008
4. Zhu J, Li W, Chen L. Doctors in China: improving quality through modernisation of residency education. Lancet. Oct 15 2016;388(10054):1922-1929. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00582-1
5. Wu L, Wang Y, Peng X, et al. Development of a medical academic degree system in China. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:23141. doi:10.3402/meo.v19.23141
6. Chaika O. Bridging the Gap: Traditional vs. Modern Education (A Value-Based Approach for Multiculturalism). In: Gomez Paloma F, ed. Lifelong Learning - Education for the Future World. IntechOpen; 2024.
7. Ha W, Ma L, Cao Y, Feng Q, Bu S. The effects of class attendance on academic performance: Evidence from synchronous courses during Covid-19 at a Chinese research university. International Journal of Educational Development. 2024/01/01/ 2024;104: 102952. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102952
8. Al Shenawi H, Yaghan R, Almarabheh A, Al Shenawi N. The relationship between attendance and academic performance of undergraduate medical students during surgical clerkship. BMC Med Educ. Jul 22 2021;21(1):396. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02833-2
9. Wang F, Ni X, Zhang M, Zhang J. Educational digital inequality: A meta-analysis of the relationship between digital device use and academic performance in adolescents. Computers & Education. 2024/05/01/ 2024;213:105003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105003
10. Mukurunge E, Nyoni CN, Hugo L. Assessment approaches in undergraduate health professions education: towards the development of feasible assessment approaches for low-resource settings. BMC Med Educ. Mar 20 2024;24(1):318. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05264-x
11. Elsamanoudy A, Shehata M, Almarabheh A, Alrefaie Z. Evaluation of modified essay questions (MEQs) as an assessment tool in third-year medical students' modular summative assessment. BMC Med Educ. Dec 18 2024;24(1):1445. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06469-w
12. Jia X, Zhu Y, Zhong X, Wen Q, Wang D, Xu M. The attitudes of postgraduate medical students towards the curriculum by degree type: a large-scale questionnaire survey. BMC Med Educ. Nov 16 2023;23(1):869. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04846-5
13. Devadoss S, Foltz J. Factors influencing student class attendance and performance. International Advances in Economic Research. 01/05 1996;2:194-195. doi:10.1007/BF02295061
14. Mearman A, Pacheco G, Webber D, Ivlevs A, Rahman T. Understanding student attendance in business schools: An exploratory study. International Review of Economics Education. 2014/09/01/ 2014;17:120-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.10.002
15. Wang W. Medical education in china: progress in the past 70 years and a vision for the future. BMC Med Educ. Aug 28 2021;21(1):453. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02875-6
16. Xiao Y, Wu XH, Huang YH, Zhu SY. Cultivation of compound ability of postgraduates with medical professional degree: the importance of double tutor system. Postgrad Med J. Sep 2022;98(1163):655-657. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-139779
17. Kus M. A meta-analysis of the impact of technology related factors on students' academic performance. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1524645. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1524645
18. Amez S, Baert S. Smartphone use and academic performance: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Research. 2020/01/01/ 2020;103: 101618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101618
19. Han S, Yi YJ. How does the smartphone usage of college students affect academic performance? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2019/02/01 2019;35(1):13-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12306
20. Witecki G, Nonnecke B. Engagement in Digital Lecture Halls: A Study of Student Course Engagement and Mobile Device use During Lecture. Journal of Information Technology Education. 01/01 2015;14:73-90. doi:10.28945/2103
21. Kay RH, Lauricella S. Unstructured vs. Structured Use of Laptops in Higher Education. Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice. 2011;10:33-42.
22. Liu Y, Tong Z, Gu Y, Guo L, Zeng G. Practice and thought on the application of new media-assisted teaching in clinical medical postgraduate education. West China Medical Journal. 2024;39(5):798-801. doi:10.7507/1002-0179.202310275
23. Wang X, Zeng W, Huang Y, Wan X. Exploration and practice of “five early” model for professional master’s degree graduate student in clinical medicine. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 2020;20(2):214-220. doi:10.7507/1672-2531.201905132
24. Yi Z, Li C, Zhao C, Deng Z, Zhang Y. Exploration and application of non-standardized answer assessment in medical education. China Medical Education Technology. 2019;33(5):551-553. doi:10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.201905011
25. Teodorczuk A, Fraser J, Rogers GD. Open book exams: A potential solution to the "full curriculum"? Med Teach. May 2018;40(5):529-530. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1412412
26. Sarkar S, Mishra P, Rajasegaran R, Salagre S. Open-book examination can reduce, exam-related stress in medical students. Med Educ. Feb 19 2025;doi:10.1111/medu.15624
27. Carbone E. Students Behaving Badly in Large Classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 1999/03/01 1999;1999(77):35-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7704
28. Wang L, Calvano LJOMJ. Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes. 2022;19(4):126-142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-01-2021-1139
29. Monks J, Schmidt RM. The impact of class size on outcomes in higher education. J The BE Journal of Economic Analysis Policy. 2011;11(1) doi:10.2202/1935-1682.2803.
30. Bandiera O, Larcinese V, Rasul I. Heterogeneous Class Size Effects: New Evidence from a Panel of University Students. 2010;120(549):1365-1398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02364.x
31. Bedard K, Kuhn P. Where class size really matters: Class size and student ratings of instructor effectiveness. Economics of Education Review. 2008/06/01/ 2008;27(3):253-265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.08.007
32. Antoniou F, Alghamdi MH, Kawai K. The effect of school size and class size on school preparedness. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1354072. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354072
33. Ake-Little E, von der Embse N, Dawson D. Does Class Size Matter in the University Setting? 2020;49(8):595-605. doi:10.3102/0013189x20933836
34. Nie N, Lai Y, Jiang L. Exploring the Path of “Inquiry-Based, Small-Class” Medical Education: A Case Study in the course of Pathology. Chinese Journal of Pathology. 2020;49(12):1358-1360. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn11215120200320-00240