The Implementation of a Perioperative Registry in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Feasibility, Fidelity, and Acceptance Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: In low and middle-income countries, nine out of every ten persons is unable to access safe and timely surgery. The limited perioperative data in resource-limited settings compromises surgical and research capacity growth. By increasing data availability, surgical disparities may be addressed through research efforts and quality initiatives. This project aimed to implement and evaluate a perioperative registry in a tertiary care hospital in a low-income country.
Methods: A prospective emergency laparotomy perioperative registry was implemented in Zambia's largest teaching and referral hospital. Over the first 6-months of implementation, 162 patients were included. Data was collected postoperatively, before discharge, and at 30 days. The registries feasibility was assessed by evaluating patient accrual, retention, and 30-day completion rates. The registries fidelity was measured by evaluating data missingness. A participant acceptance survey was retrospectively collected and analyzed for the first 25 consecutively enrolled patients.
Results: The capture rate of the registry could not be calculated due to a destroyed theatre logbook. The participant accrual and retention rates were 99.4% and 95.1%, respectively. The participant completion rate at 30-days was 75.6%. The overall incidence of missing information in the registry was 3.5%. More than 75% of participant responses to the acceptance survey were positive in each category regarding the ethical conduct of research and the storing of personal data.
Conclusion: The value of this study is the reporting and evaluation of a successful perioperative registry implementation with minimal external funding. This framework is being used to develop new data registries and may provide a roadmap for other hospitals with resource constraints.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and
3. solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X
4. Bickler SW, Spiegel D. Improving Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pivotal Role for the World Health Organization. World J Surg. 2010;34(3):386-90. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0273-2
5. Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, et al. Global Disease Burden of Conditions Requiring Emergency Surgery. Br J of Surg. 2014;101(1):e9-22. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9329
6. Sonderman KA, Citron I, Meara JG. National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Planning in the Context of Global Surgery: The Way Forward. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):959-960.6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2440
7. GlobalSurg Collaborative. Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Br J Surg. 2016;103(8):971-988. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10151
8. Gazzetta J, Gazzetta E, Mulenga MJ, et al. Surgical healthcare: How Sub-Saharan Africa is translating global, regional, and national policy into action. Medical Research Archives, [online]. 2025;13(2). doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i2.6238
9. Makasa EM. Access to emergency and essential surgery obstetrics trauma and anaesthesia healthcare: a contemporary overview. J. Public Health Emerg, [online]. 2020;5(8). doi: 10.21037/jphe-2020-gs-12
10. Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL, et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1589-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30001-1
11. Diehl T, Jaraczewski TJ, Ahmed KS, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Collecting Surgical Outcome Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An International Survey. Ann Surg Open. 2024;5(1):e384. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000384
12. Haider A, Scott JW, Gause CD, et al. Development of a Unifying Target and Consensus Indicators for Global Surgical Systems Strengthening: Proposed by the Global Alliance for Surgery, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care (The G4 Alliance). World J Surg. 2017;41(10):2426-2434. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4028-1
13. Dare AJ, Obembe-Onajin B, Makasa EM. A snapshot of surgical outcomes and needs in Africa. Lancet. 2018;391(10130):1553-1554. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30002-3
14. Aluisio AR, Waheed S, Cameron P, et al. Clinical emergency care research in low-income and middle-income countries: opportunities and challenges. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;29(4):e001289. Doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001289
15. Research Electronic Data Capture. About. Accessed November 20, 2024. https://projectredcap.org/about/
16. Janic A, Kimani K, Olembo I, et al. Lessons for Patient Engagement in Research in Low- and middle-income countries. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;(9)221-229. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00246-w
17. Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Marubashi S, et al. Validity and significance of 30-day mortality rate as a quality indicator for gastrointestinal cancer surgeries. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018;2(3):231-240. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12070
18. 17 Jaraczewski TJ, Abebe BM, Diehl T, et al. Implementation of a perioperative registry in Ethiopia to enhance surgical quality improvement. World J Surg. 2024;48(8):1829-1839. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12240
19. Kluyts HL, Biccard BM. The role of peri-operative registries in improving the quality of care in low-resource environments. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(7):888-891. doi: 10.1111/anae.15445
20. Mughal NA, Hussain MH, Ahmed KS, et al. Barriers to Surgical Outcomes Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. J Surg Res. 2023;290:188-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.017
21. Gazzetta J, Makasa EMM, Mwale M, et al. Assessing the Perioperative Capacity in the Republic of Zambia in Preparation for the First Revision of the National Surgical Obstetric and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP): A Rapid Survey Method. World J Surg. Online May 6, 2025. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12615
22. Beane A, De Silva AP, Athapattu PL, et al. Addressing the information deficit in global health: lessons from a digital acute care platform in Sri Lanka. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(1):e001134. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001134
23. Kifle F, Kifleyohanes T, Moore J, et al. Indications, Challenges, and Characteristics of Successful Implementation of Perioperative Registries in Low Resource Settings: A Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2023;47:1387-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06909-6