Towards a Dynamic Cross-Sector Alignment for Sustainability in Healthcare Ecosystems

Main Article Content

Nabil Georges Badr http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-3718

Abstract

Healthcare ecosystems face significant challenges in achieving long-term sustainability while addressing public health and social service needs. This paper conceptualizes purpose-aligned systems as a framework for sustainable healthcare, emphasizing cross-sector alignment in governance, financing, data sharing, and stakeholder collaboration. By integrating concepts from the Actor-for-Actor approach, we illustrate a cyclical process of engagement, resource integration, and collective action that reinforces sustainability.


The study explores the complex healthcare ecosystem, which includes healthcare practice, public health, and social services, and examines different pathways for achieving cross-sector alignment to improve population health and reduce disparities. The absence of continuity in governance, financial stability, and stakeholder trust presents a key obstacle to sustainability. Leveraging systems theory and service science, the paper argues that sustainability requires both purpose-driven design and effective purpose aligned collaboration, ensuring that healthcare ecosystems evolve dynamically rather than remain static.


Using the Actor-for-Actor approach, we emphasize how healthcare system sustainability can be fostered through shared purpose, collaborative governance, and strategic resource allocation. Our proposed model highlights a cyclical value co-creation process, demonstrating how purpose-aligned healthcare ecosystems can optimize decision-making, enhance interoperability, and strengthen systemic resilience. Ultimately, the findings set the stage for further research on sustainable healthcare models, offering a conceptual foundation for continued exploration of sustainable healthcare ecosystems.

Keywords: Actor-for-Actor approach, Healthcare ecosystem sustainability

Article Details

How to Cite
BADR, Nabil Georges. Towards a Dynamic Cross-Sector Alignment for Sustainability in Healthcare Ecosystems. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 6, june 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6630>. Date accessed: 15 july 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i6.6630.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Polese F, Pels J, Tronvoll B, Bruni R, Carrubbo L. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. Practice. 2017;27(5):1040-1056.
2. Lanford D, Petiwala A, Landers G, Minyard K. Aligning healthcare, public health and social services: a scoping review of the role of purpose, governance, finance and data. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(2):432-447.
3. Landers GM, Minyard KJ, Lanford D, Heishman H. A theory of change for aligning health care, public health, and social services in the time of COVID-19. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(S2):S178-S180.
4. Heuer M. Ecosystem cross-sector collaboration: conceptualizing an adaptive approach to sustainability governance. Bus Strategy Environ. 2011;20(4):211-221.
5. Petiwala A, Lanford D, Landers G, Minyard K. Community voice in cross-sector alignment: concepts and strategies from a scoping review of the health collaboration literature. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1-11.
6. Napp D, Conklin J. Evaluation of the first year of the cross-sector innovation initiative: lessons learned in advancing cross-sector alignment. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(Supplement 4):S187-S191.
7. https://unric.org/en/sdg-3/.
8. Ortega-Galán ÁM, Ortiz-Amo R, Andina-Díaz E, Ruiz-Fernández MD. The sustainability of public social services: a qualitative study. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3860.
9. As’ ad N, Patrício L, Koskela-Huotari K, Edvardsson B. Understanding service ecosystem dynamics: a typology. J Serv Manag. 2024;35(6):159-184.
10. Iandolo F, Cosimato S. Shaping sustainable service ecosystems: an analysis of some possible enhancing factors. PIJ PuntOorg Int J 4 2 2019. Published online 2019:89-102.
11. Liaropoulos L, Goranitis I. Health care financing and the sustainability of health systems. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:1-4.
12. Sergejeff K, Karaki K, Ronceray M, Apiko P. European and African financing for health and universal health coverage. Published online 2024.
13. Oso OB, Alli OI, Babarinde AO, Ibeh AI. Advanced financial modeling in healthcare investments: A framework for optimizing sustainability and impact. Gulf J Adv Bus Res. 2025;3(2):561-589.
14. Ackoff RL, Ackoff RL, Emery FE. On Purposeful Systems: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Individual and Social Behavior as a System of Purposeful Events. Transaction Publishers; 2005.
15. Clarkson J, Dean J, Ward J, Komashie A, Bashford T. A systems approach to healthcare: from thinking to practice. Future Healthc J. 2018;5(3):151-155.
16. McNab D, McKay J, Shorrock S, Luty S, Bowie P. Development and application of ‘systems thinking’principles for quality improvement. BMJ Open Qual. 2020;9(1).
17. Badr NG. Learning Healthcare Ecosystems for Equity in Health Service Provisioning and Delivery: Smart Cities and the Quintuple Aim. In: The Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart City Applications. Springer; 2022:237-251.
18. Vargo SL, Lusch RF, Akaka MA. Advancing service science with service-dominant logic: Clarifications and conceptual development. Handb Serv Sci. Published online 2010:133-156.
19. Barile S, Quattrociocchi B, Calabrese M, Iandolo F. Sustainability and the viable systems approach: opportunities and issues for the governance of the territory. Sustainability. 2018;10(3):790.
20. Formisano V, Quattrociocchi B, Fedele M, Calabrese M. From Viability to Sustainability: The Contribution of the Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Sustainability. 2018;10(3):725. doi:10.3390/su10030725
21. Iandolo F, Barile S, Armenia S, Carrubbo L. A system dynamics perspective on a viable systems approach definition for sustainable value. Sustain Sci. 2018;13:1245-1263.
22. Buzeti T, Madureira Lima J, Yang L, Brown C. Leaving no one behind: health equity as a catalyst for the sustainable development goals. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_1):i24-i27.
23. Piquer-Martinez C, Urionagüena A, Benrimoj SI, et al. Theories, models and frameworks for health systems integration. A scoping review. Health Policy. 2024;141:104997.
24. Badr NG, Carrubbo L, Ruberto M, others. Responding to COVID-19: Potential Hospital-at-Home Solutions to Re-configure the Healthcare Service Ecosystem. In: HEALTHINF. ; 2021:344-351.
25. Saviano M, Barile S, Caputo F, La Sala A. Sustainability as a co-created service: Integrating complex adaptive systems and service-dominant logic within the triple helix framework. AMS Rev. Published online 2025:1-15.
26. Turenne CP, Gautier L, Degroote S, Guillard E, Chabrol F, Ridde V. Conceptual analysis of health systems resilience: a scoping review. Soc Sci Med. 2019;232:168-180.
27. Martin L, Knowles EE. Model for an integrated health system. J Integr Care. 2020;28(2):161-170.
28. Singer SJ, Kerrissey M, Friedberg M, Phillips R. A comprehensive theory of integration. Med Care Res Rev. 2020;77(2):196-207.
29. Reed S, Evans EJ, Hooyman N. Social work: Leading the move upstream to improve the nation’s health. Health Soc Work. 2020;45(2):77-79.
30. Badr NG, Sorrentino M, De Marco M, Fugini M. Improving interaction in integrated chronic care management. In: 2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE). IEEE; 2019:265-270.
31. Mohtar LN, Badr NG. Digital bridge or tradeoff: telehealth adoption and healthcare service quality. A scoping review. Sustain Digit Transform Paving Way Smart Organ Soc. Published online 2022:253-268.
32. Baker DW. Achieving health care equity requires a systems approach. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024;50(1):1-5.