The Annual Carbon Footprint of In-Person Attendance at Major Neurological Conferences
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Anthropogenic climate change is the greatest threat to health of our century, including increased risk and severity of neurological diseases. Policies to contain the progression of climate change to within the adaptability of the human system demand urgent reduction in carbon emissions across all sectors. Neurologists should not be exempt. Global travel to conferences is the main source of academia’s carbon emissions. Lack of awareness of the extent of the problem and of the urgency of effective intervention may explain the lack of mitigating actions from the neurological community.
We aimed to provide a conservative estimate of neurologists’ annual CO2 emissions from in-person attendance at some of their main global conferences.
Methods: The number of in-person attendees at some major international neurological conferences in 2022/2023 was assessed by a Google search. The CO2 emissions per capita (tCO2/person) was calculated by obtaining the average of the values published in four studies of non-neurological conferences. The total tCO2 emissions from all attendees at the neurological conferences was then compared to the annual tCO2/person in various countries world-wide.
Results: Thirteen conferences were identified with a total of 47,956 attendees. The total tCO2 emissions was then calculated at 93,994 (1.96 tonnes x 47,956 attendees).
This equated to annual tCO2/person ranging from >2.0 million people in several African countries to 6.700 in Canada.
Conclusion: This simple analysis based on literature values to calculate carbon emissions by attendees, shows staggering figures that only represent a partial annual contribution from the neurological discipline. In the context of a climate crisis that requires urgent actions, neurologists should carefully consider their choices and implement actions to effectively reduce the carbon cost of their conferences.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Romanello M, di Napoli C, Green C et al. The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms. Lancet 2023; 402: 2346-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7
3. International Court of Justice. Verbatim record 2024/54 for public sitting held on Friday 13 December 2024, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the General Assembly of the United Nations). 2024. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/caserelated/187/187-20241213-ora-02-00-bi.pdf (accessed Dec 17, 2024).
4. WHO. COP29 special report on climate change and health: health is the argument for climate action. 2024. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/defaultsource/environment-climate-change-and-health/58595-who-cop29-specialreport_layout_9web.pdf?sfvrsn=dd2b816_8 (accessed Dec 17, 2024).
5. Wang J, Hu X, Yang T et al. Ambient air pollution and the dynamic transitions of stroke and dementia: a population-based cohort study. eClinicalMedicine 2024;67: 102368. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102368. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6. Le Quéré C, Capstick S, Corner A et al. Towards a culture of low-carbon research for the 21st Century. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. 2015 http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/twp161.pdf
7. Passalacqua, A. 2021. The Carbon Footprint of a Scientific Community: A Survey of the Historians of Mobility and Their Normalized yet Abundant Reliance on Air Travel. 2021. Journal of Transport History 2021; 42:121–41.
8. Stroud, J. T., & Feeley, K. J. Responsible academia: Optimizing conference locations to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. Ecography 2015; 38(4), 402–404.
9. Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Moore, I., Köhler, J., & Le Quéré, C. Use of aviation by climate change researchers: Structural influences, personal attitudes, and information provision. Global Environmental Change 2020; 65, Article 102184.
10. Gore, T. Carbon inequality by 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5°C goal. Institute for European Environmental Policy & Oxfam, 2021; 1–12.
11. Bousema, T., Selvaraj, P., Djimde, A. A., Yakar, D., Hagedorn, B., Pratt, A., Barret, D., Whitfield, K., & Cohen, J. M. Reducing the carbon footprint of academic conferences: The example of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020; 103(5), 1758.
12. Leddin D, Galts C, McRobert E, Igoe J, Singh H, Sinclair P. The Carbon Cost of Travel to a Medical Conference: Modelling the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2022; 5(2): 52– 58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwab021
13. Klöwer M, Hopkins D, Allen M, Higham J. An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19. Nature. 2020;583(7816):356–59.
14. Burtscher L, Barret D, Borkar AP et al. The carbon footprint of large astronomy meetings. Nature Astronomy 2020, 4 (9): 823– 25.
15. Gattrell WT, Barraux A, Comley S, Whaley M, Lander N. The Carbon Costs of In‑Person Versus Virtual Medical Conferences for the Pharmaceutical Industry: Lessons from the Coronavirus Pandemic. Pharmaceutical Medicine 2022; 36:131– 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-022-00421-3
16. Global Carbon Atlas Project. Global Carbon Atlas. 2023. http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions. (Accessed June 2025)
17. Viglione G. A year without conferences? How the coronavirus pandemic could change research. Nature 2020; 579: 327- 29.
18. Holden MH, Butt N, Chauvenet A, Plein M, Stringer M and Chadès I. Academic conferences urgently need environmental policies. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2017; 1: 1211-12.
19. Pelosi l, Simon N. Neuromuscular ultrasound training courses in the post COVID-19 era: Is virtual training here to stay, and should the pre-pandemic training design be revised? Muscle & Nerve 2022;65:1–3.
20. Tawfik EA, van Alfen N, Cartwright MS et a. Virtual neuromuscular ultrasound courses during COVID-19 pandemic: Leveraging technology to enhance learning opportunities. Muscle Nerve. 2022;65(1):29-33. doi:10.1002/mus.27415
21. Raby CL,Madden JR. Moving academic conferences online: Aids and barriers to delegate participation. Ecology and Evolution 2021; DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7376
22. Pelosi., and Blumhardt, HP., 2024. Climate Change and Health: Health Academics Could Do More to Build Upon the Success of Virtual Conferences During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Medical Research Archives, [online] 12(7). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i7.5538
23. Foramitti J, Drews S, Klein F, Konc T. The virtues of virtual conferences. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 294, 126287.