Autogenous Tooth-Derived Graft Material in Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Clinical and Histological Assessment

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Aug 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i8.6785

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

Lanka Mahesh, BDS, MBA, PhD
Private practice New Delhi, India
Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS
Private practice Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
Nikita Gulati, MDS
ITS Dental College, Department of Oral Pathology, Ghaziabad, UP, India

Abstract

Autogenous tooth-derived graft materials have recently emerged as a novel option in alveolar bone regeneration due to their biocompatibility, osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. This study evaluates the clinical and histological outcomes of using processed extracted teeth as bone graft material during immediate implant placement. The results support that tooth-derived grafts are effective in socket preservation and promote bone regeneration comparable to traditional graft materials.

Article Details

How to Cite
MAHESH, Lanka; KURTZMAN, Gregori M.; GULATI, Nikita. Autogenous Tooth-Derived Graft Material in Alveolar Bone Regeneration: A Clinical and Histological Assessment. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 8, aug. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6785>. Date accessed: 06 dec. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i8.6785.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 13 No 8 (2025): Vol.13, Issue 8, August 2025
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):49-70.

2. Sheikh Z, et al. Bone replacement materials and techniques used for achieving vertical alveolar bone augmentation. Materials. 2015;8(6):2953-2993.

3. Kim YK, et al. Tooth-derived bone graft material. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39(3): 103-111.

4. Murata M. Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix for maxillary sinus augmentation in humans: the first clinical report. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12): 1138-1143.

5. Kim YK, et al. Histological study of demineralized tooth and bone matrix grafts. Implant Dent. 2014; 23(3):331-336.

6. Nampo T, et al. A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth. J Periodontol. 2010; 81(9):1264-1272.

7. Bessho K, et al. Human dentin matrix as a scaffold for bone morphogenetic protein-induced bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25(10): 1303-1311.

8. Tziafas D, et al. Odontoblast-like cell differentiation in dog pulp cultures by allogenic dentin matrix. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40(10):941-950.

9. Bang G. Histopathological studies of the pulpal response to calcium hydroxide-containing cements. J Dent Res. 1967;46(5):1034-1042.

10. Gomes MF, et al. Dentin matrix for alveolar bone tissue engineering: a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(5):551-558.

11. Al-Asfour A, et al. Comparison of demineralized dentin graft and autogenous bone graft for onlay bone grafting in a rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(5):e236-e243.

12. Zitzmann NU, et al. The volume stability of autogenous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(6):559-565.

13. Kim YK, et al. Evaluation of autogenous tooth bone graft material for socket preservation. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39(3):103-111.

14. Kuperschlag A, Keršytė G, Kurtzman GM, Horowitz RA. Autogenous Dentin Grafting of Osseous Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molars After Extraction of Impacted Third Molars. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2020 Feb;41(2):76-82; quiz 83. PMID: 32017585.

15. Horowitz RA, Kurtzman GM. Improving the Prognosis of Periodontally Involved Teeth at the Time of Extraction of Adjacent Teeth With an Amnion-Chorion Barrier and Bioactive Dentin Graft. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2024 Jul-Aug;45(7):e1-e4. PMID: 39 029967.