Evaluation of ChatGPT artificial intelligence dialogues and simulated scenarios to prepare nursing students for telehealth practicum
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Telehealth care technologies and innovations will continue to expand and provide the means for improving quality and access to health care services. Respectively, the professional, research, academic, and leadership responsibilities include informing, educating, and resourcing future generations of health care providers for telehealth practices. Thus, an academic-practice partnership consisting of nursing faculty and Federally Qualified Health Center registered nurses co-facilitated a primary care telehealth practicum to prepare baccalaureate nursing students for practice. When the students expressed lack of confidence in conducting telephone calls with the patients, the faculty piloted a telehealth orientation that included simulated ChatGPT dialogues and virtual scenarios with motivational interviewing feedback.
Aim: The purpose of the pilot project was to evaluate the combined effectiveness of artificial intelligence and virtual simulation scenarios in terms of increasing 32 senior level students’ perceived readiness and participation during telehealth practicums with faculty, primary care nurses, and enrolled patients.
Methods: The Plan, Do, Study, Act framework was applied to develop, implement, and evaluate the pilot telehealth orientation. The project processes included students’ accomplishments of the following: pre-survey, simulated ChatGPT and virtual learning activities, reflection, and post-survey. The Special Projects of National Significance Program Cooperative Agreement Evaluation survey was applied to measure the students’ perceived abilities to counsel and manage clients. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was used to evaluate the students’ perceived gains related to telehealth facilitation skills, attitudes, and comfort. With consideration for the small sample size and non-normal data distribution, the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was applied to determine the significance of students’ perceived skills, attitudes, and comfort gains.
Results: Following completion of the telehealth orientation and simulations, the students’ perceived significant increases in abilities to counsel and manage clients' when providing telehealth services and overall knowledge of telehealth applications within the context of primary care.
Conclusions: Combined simulation and live telehealth learning activities during prelicensure programs may be used to prepare future health care providers for practice in the Digital Era, and to measurably demonstrate value to the health care team and system by decreasing health care costs and increasing clients’ access to services.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Ezeamii VC, Okobi OE, Wambai-Sani H, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: how telemedicine is improving patient outcomes and expanding access to care. Cureus. 2024;16(7):1-10. doi:10.7759/cureus.63881
3. Roy J, Levy DR, Senathirajah Y. Defining telehealth for research, implementation, and equity. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(4):e35037. doi:10.2196/35037
4. Sheperis DS, Smith A. Telehealth best practice: a call for standards of care. J Technol Couns Educ Superv. 2021;1(1):27-35. doi:10.22371/tces/0004
5. Dinesen B, Nonnecke B, Lindeman D, et al. Personalized telehealth in the future: a global research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(3):e53. doi:10.2196/jmir.5257.
6. Rising KL, Kemp M, Leader AE, et al. A prioritized patient-centered research agenda to reduce disparities in telehealth uptake: results from a national consensus conference. Telemed Rep. 2023;4(1):387-395. doi:10.1089/tmr.2023.0051
7. Chike-Harris KE, Durham C, Logan A, Smith G, DuBose-Morris R. Integration of telehealth education into the health care provider curriculum: a review. Telemed e-Health. 2021;27(2):137-149. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0261
8. Jonasdottir SK, Thordardottir I, Jonsdottir T. Health professionals’ perspective towards challenges and opportunities of telehealth service provision: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform. 2022;167:104862. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104862
9. Rangachari PA. Holistic framework of strategies and best practices for telehealth service design and implementation. In: Pfannstiel MA, Brehmer N, Rasche C, eds. Service Design Practices for Healthcare Innovation. Springer International Publishing; 2022:315-335.
10. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. National Academy of Medicine; 2021. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25982/the-future-of-nursing-2020-2030-charting-a-path-to
11. American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing. Scope and Standards of Practice for Professional Telehealth Nursing. 6th ed. American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing; 2018.
12. Rambur B, Palumbo MV, Nurkanovic M. Prevalence of telehealth in nursing: implications for regulation and education in the era of value-based care. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2019;20(2):64-73. doi:10.1177/1527 154419836752
13. Alharbi AA, Almalki MHM, Alhawit ME, et al. The impact of value-based care models: the role of nurses and administrators in healthcare improvement. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6(S10):2186-2211. doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS10.15411
14. Bartz CC. Telehealth nursing research: adding to the evidence-base for healthcare. J Int Soc Telemed eHealth. 2020;8(e19):1-9. doi:10.29086/JISfTeH.8.e19
15. Ali-Saleh O, Massalha L, Halperin O. Evaluation of a simulation program for providing telenursing training to nursing students: cohort study. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e67804. doi:10.2196/67804
16. Bdair IA. Perceptions of pre-licensure nursing students toward telecare and telenursing. Inform Health Soc Care. 2024;49(1):42-55. doi:10.1080/17538157.2022.2162140
17. Gutiérrez-Puertas L, Gutiérrez-Puertas V, Ortiz-Rodríguez B, Márquez-Hernández VV, Granados-Gámez G. Communication and empathy of nursing students in patient care through telenursing: a comparative cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;126:105834. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105834
18. Mun M, Choi S, Woo K. Investigating perceptions and attitude toward telenursing among undergraduate nursing students for the future of nursing education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):236. doi:10.1186/s12912-024-01903-2
19. Rossler KL, Badowski D, Siegel S. The presence of simulated telehealth in prelicensure nursing education: a scoping review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2023;77:15-22. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.05.003
20. Thomas RM, Moore LP, Urquhart BB, et al. Use of simulated telenursing with standardized patients to enhance prelicensure nursing education. Nurse Educ. 2023;48(6):E191-E195. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001410
21. Simmons S, Tabi M, Bester E, Zanetos J. Integrating telehealth into nursing education through standardized patient simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2024;97:101647. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101647
22. Moore J, Jairath N, Montejo L, O'Brien S, Want D. Using a telehealth simulation to prepare nursing students for intraprofessional collaboration. Clin Simul Nurs. 2023;78:1-6. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.007
23. DeFoor M, Darby W, Pierce V. “Get Connected”: Integrating telehealth triage in a prelicensure clinical simulation. J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(9):518-521. doi:10.3928/01484834-20200817-12
24. Posey L, Pintz C, Zhou QP, Lewis K, Slaven-Lee P. Nurse practitioner student perceptions of face-to-face and telehealth standardized patient simulations. J Nurs Regul. 2020;10(4):37-44. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(20)30012-0
25. Watkins SM, Jarvill M, Wright V. Simulated telenursing encounters with standardized participant feedback for prelicensure nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2022;47(2):125-126. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001100
26. Greenberg ME, Rutenberg C. Telehealth and virtual care nursing. In: Coburn CV, Gilland D, Swan BA, eds. Perspectives in Ambulatory Care Nursing. Wolters Kluwer; 2022:163-183.
27. Durnas H. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM. www.inacsl.org. Published 2021. Accessed May 31, 2025. https://www.inacsl.org/healthcare-simulation-standards-ql
28. Shorey S, Ang E, Yap J, Ng ED, Lau ST, Chui CK. A virtual counseling application using artificial intelligence for communication skills training in nursing education: development study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(10):e14658. doi:10.2196/14658
29. Buchanan C, Howitt L, Wilson R, Booth RG, Risling T, Bamford M. Predicted influences of artificial intelligence on nursing education: scoping review. JMIR Nurs. 2021;4(1):e23933. doi:10.2196/23933
30. Castonguay A, Farthing P, Davies S, et al. Revolutionizing nursing education through AI integration: a reflection on the disruptive impact of ChatGPT. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;129:1-3. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105916
31. DeGagne JC. The state of artificial intelligence in nursing education: past, present, and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(6):4884. doi:10.3390/ijerph20064884
32. Glauberman G, Ito-Fujita A, Katz S, Callahan J. Artificial intelligence in nursing education: opportunities and challenges. Hawaii J Health Soc Welfare. 2023;82(12):302-305. Accessed May 31, 2025. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10713739/pdf/hjhsw8212_0302.pdf
33. Bumbach MD, Carrington JM, Love R, Bjarnadottir R, Cho H, Keenan G. The use of artificial intelligence for graduate nursing education: an educational evaluation. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2024;36(9):486-490. doi:10.1097/JXX.0000000000001059
34. Muecke MA. Community health diagnosis in nursing. Public Health Nurs.1984;1(1):23-35. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.1984.tb00427.x
35. U.S. Department of Education. FERPA: Protecting student privacy. studentprivacy.ed.gov. Updated December 2, 2011. Accessed May 31, 2025. https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/ferpa
36. SPNS Program Cooperative Agreement Evaluation Module 57: Training Evaluation Form: Skills, Attitudes, Comfort. Go2itech.org. March 22, 1996. Accessed May 31, 2025. https://www.go2itech.org/HTML/TT06/toolkit/evaluation/forms.html
37. Plichta SB, Kelvin EA. Munro’s Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
38. Al-Omari E, Dorri R, Blanco M, Al-Hassan M. Innovative curriculum development: embracing the concept-based approach in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nurs. 2024;19(4):324-333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.018
39. Repsha CL, Quinn BL, Peters AB. Implementing a concept-based nursing curriculum: a review of the literature. Teaching and Learning in Nurs. 2020;15(1):66-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.09.006
40. Cortés-Rodríguez AE, Roman P, López-Rodríguez MM, Fernández-Medina IM, Fernández-Sola C, Hernández-Padilla JM. Role-play versus standardised patient simulation for teaching interprofessional communication in care of the elderly for nursing students. Healthcare. 2022; 10(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010046
41. Jiang N, Zhang Y, Liang S, et al. Effectiveness of virtual simulations versus mannequins and real persons in medical and nursing education: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e56195-e56195. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/56195
42. Magi CE, Bambi S, Iovino P, et al. Virtual reality and augmented reality training in disaster medicine courses for students in nursing: a scoping review of adoptable tools. Behav Sci. 2023;13(7):616. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070616
43. Clinical judgment measurement model. NCLEX.org. January 22, 2019. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.nclex.com/clinical-judgment-measurement-model.page
44. Jessee MA. An update on clinical judgment in nursing and implications for education, practice, and regulation. J Nurs Regul. 2021;12(3):50-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(21)00116-2
45. IPEC core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: version 3. ipecollaborative.org. November 20, 2023. Accessed July 11, 2025. https://www.ipecollaborative.org/assets/core-competencies/IPEC_Core_Competencies_ Version_3_2023.pdf
46. Price SL, Sim SM, Little V, et al. A longitudinal, narrative study of professional socialisation among health students. Med Education. 2021;55(4):478-485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14437
47. Pearl R, Wayling B. The telehealth era is just beginning. Harv Bus Rev. 2022;1. Accessed June 1, 2025. https://hbr.org/2022/05/the-telehealth-era-is-just-beginning