Effect of intervention based on the Bobath Concept in children with Cerebral Palsy
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The treatment based on the Bobath Concept can improve the functionality in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP).
Aim: to demonstrate the effects of treatment based on Bobath Concept on functional tasks in the context of participation and activities of children with CP.
Method: This is a pre/post intervention assessment design, whose sample consisted of 10 children with CP, aged 8 years and 6.5 months (SD=3 years and 4 months), GMFCS levels III-V, voluntary participants who received treatment conducted by the therapists of the Bobath Course. Baseline assessments were Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) and Segmental Trunk Control Assessment (SATCo-BR). The pre-tests of the chosen tasks by children/parents was filmed and coded by GAS. The child received five sessions of intervention, with 1 hour and 15 minutes of duration, for 2 weeks. The assessments were repeated for the post-test. A satisfaction questionnaire was applied after treatment.
Results: Eight patients achieved some degree of improvement in GAS (U=5, p<0.01). There was no difference in the total score of SATCo even though 5 patients obtained gain in relation to trunk control. The questionnaire revealed improvements in a few sessions that have repercussions on the child's daily activities and participation.
Conclusion: a short period of treatment make that all patients gained in functional tasks, and parents perceived the functional improvement of their children. The duration of treatment was not enough to show gains in body structure and function related to trunk control.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Dan B, Rosenbaum P, Carr L, Gough M, Coughlan J, Nweke N. Proposed updated description of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025; 00:1-10. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.16274
3. de Torre CR. Bobath in Brazil: what is the best study design for intervention for children with cerebral palsy?. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 May;10. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15147.
4. Alcantara de Torre CRM, Golineleo MTB. Conceito Bobath Contemporâneo. In: Tudela E, Formiga CK, ed. Fisioterapia Neuropediátrica – abordagem biopsicosocial. Manole; 2021:341–353.
5. Bierman JC. Neuro-Developmental Treatment: Definitions and Philosophical Foundations. In: Bierman JC, Franjoine MR, Hazzard CM, Howle JM, Stamer M, ed. Neuro-developement treatment: A guide to NDT clinical practice. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2016:4-16.
6. Cayo C, Diamond M, Bovre T, Mullens P, Ward P, Haynes M, Franjoine MR. The NDT/Bobath (Neuro-Developmental Treatment/Bobath) Approach. NDTA Network. 2015;22(2):1.
7. Mayston MJ, Saloojee GM, Foley SE. The Bobath Clinical Reasoning Framework: A systems science approach to the complexity of neurodevelopmental conditions, including cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2024 May;66(5):564-72. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.15748
8. Richards CL, Malouin F. Cerebral palsy: definition, assessment and rehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013 Jan 1;111:183-95. DOI: 10.1016/ B978-0-444-52891-9.00018-X.
9. Bain K, Bombria SD, Chapparo CJ, Donelly M, Heard R, Treacy S. Goal attainment of children with cerebral palsy participating in multi‐modal intervention. Child Care Health Dev. 2023 Nov;49 (6):1066-75. DOI: 10.1111/cch.13117.
10. Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Apr;23(4):362-70. DOI: 10.1177/0269215508101742.
11. Sá CD, Fávero FM, Voos MC, Choren F, Carvalho RD. Brazilian version of the segmental assessment of trunk control (SATCo). Fisioter Pesqui. 2017 Jan;24:89-99. DOI: 10.1590/1809-2950/16955824012017.
12. Argetsinger LC, Trimble SA, Roberts MT, Thompson JE, Ugiliweneza B, Behrman AL. Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) in children with spinal cord injury. Dev Neurorehabilit. 2019 May 19;22(4):260-71. DOI: 10.1080/175184 23.2018.1475429
13. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. JGME. 2012 Sep 1;4(3):279-82. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
14. Vitrikas K, Dalton H, Breish D. Cerebral palsy: an overview. AFP. 2020 Feb 15;101(4):213-20. PMID: 32053326
15. Novak I, Morgan C, Fahey M, Finch-Edmondson M, Galea C, Hines A, Langdon K, Namara MM, Paton MC, Popat H, Shore B. State of the evidence traffic lights 2019: systematic review of interventions for preventing and treating children with cerebral palsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Feb;20(2):3. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-020-1022-z.
16. Van Tittelboom V, Heyrman L, De Cat J, Algoet P, Peeters N, Alemdaroğlu-Gürbüz I, Plasschaert F, Van Herpe K, Molenaers G, De Bruyn N, Deschepper E. Intensive therapy of the lower limbs and the trunk in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy: comparing a qualitative functional and a functional approach. J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 15;12(12):4078. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124078.
17. de Sá CD, Fagundes IK, Araújo TB, Oliveira AS, Fávero FM. The relevance of trunk evaluation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the segmental assessment of trunk control. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2016 Oct; 74(10):791-5. DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20160124.
18. Franki I, Desloovere K, De Cat J, Feys H, Molenaers G, Calders P, Vanderstraeten G, Himpens E, Van den Broeck C. The evidence-base for conceptual approaches and additional therapies targeting lower limb function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review using the ICF as a framework. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2012 Apr 18;44(5):396-405.
19. Arndt SW, Chandler LS, Sweeney JK, Sharkey MA, McElroy JJ (2008). Effects of a neuro-developmental treatment-based trunk protocol for infants with posture and movement dysfunction. Pediatr Phys Ther 20(1): 11-22. DOI:10.1097/PEP. 0b013e31815e8595
20. Slusarski J (2002) Gait changes in children with cerebral palsy following a neuro-developmental treatment course. Pediatr Phys Ther 14(1): 55- 56.
21. Bar-Haim S, Harries N, Belokopytov M, Frank A, Copeliovitch L, et al. (2006) Comparison of efficacy of Adeli suit and neurodevelopmental treatments in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 48(5): 325-330. DOI: 10.1017/S00121 62206000727
22. Tsorlakis N, Evaggelinou C, Grouios G, Tsorbatzoudis C (2004) Effect of intensive neurodevelopmental treatment in gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 46(11): 740-745. DOI: 10.1017/S00 12162204001276
23. Tao W, Lu Z, Wen F (2016) The Influence of neurodevelopmental treatment on transforming growth factor-β1 levels and neurological remodeling in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 31(13): 1464- 1467. DOI: 10.1177/0883073 816656402
24. Türker D, Korkem D, Özal C, Günel MK, Karahan S (2015) The effects of neurodevelopmental (Bobath) therapy based goal directed therapy on gross motor function and functional status of children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Therapies and Rehabilitation Research 4(4): 9-20. DOI: 10.5455/ijtrr.00000060
25. Alcântara de Torre, C., & Carvalho, R.P. (2022). Deimplementation of NDT in CP is Required? Many Reasons for Not Doing it!!!!. RPN. 000647. DOI: 10.31031/RPN.2022.06.000647.