Post-Approval Change Management for Virus Retentive Filters
Main Article Content
Abstract
Virus clearance steps – inactivation and/or removal of viruses – have to be implemented in the manufacturing process of biologicals to assure a high margin of virus safety of these products for patients in need. The implementation of virus retentive filters result in a robust virus clearance as only the size/shape of viruses is relevant in the context of the removal capacity of the filters – viruses larger than the mean pore size of a virus retentive filter are removed from the feed stream and the desired protein – and not the properties of viruses as enveloped or non-enveloped, single or double stranded DNA or RNA, and resistance to physicochemical treatment. When during the lifecycle of the product a change of the established virus retentive filter is required due to e.g., supply issues by the manufacturer of these filters currently implemented in the manufacturing process or an improved filter is provided by filter manufacturers, a change of filters has to or may be initiated. This post-approval change has to meet regulatory guidance, e.g., ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use) guidelines, for licensed products.
When changing virus retentive filters, the critical parameters volumetric throughput of product intermediate and, when performed, buffer flush, pressure, pressure/flow interruption, and flow decay have to be validated for the new filter demonstrating the same or improved virus clearance capacity. Comparable drug substance properties regarding, besides virus removal capacity, e.g., impurities and protein aggregates, have to be demonstrated. Validation data comparing the current with the changed process, based on prior knowledge of established engineering principles and applied manufacturing experience, especially during the development of the drug substance, published literature and other information form the basis of the risk assessment prior to implement the change. After having assessed the impact of the change in virus retentive filters according to regulatory guidelines without negative effects on product quality and safety, the potential change has to be reported to the relevant regulatory authority in line with existing regional regulations and guidance.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Brorson K, Sofer G, Aranha H. Nomenclature standardization for ‘large pore size’ virus-retentive filters. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2005;59(6):341-345. PMID: 16471421
3. Lute S, Riordan W, Pease LF 3rd, et al. A consensus rating method for small virus-retentive filters. I. Method development. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2008;62(5):318-333. PMID: 19055228
4. Brorson K, Lute S, Haque M, et al. A consensus rating method for small virus-retentive filters. II. Method evaluation. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2008; 62(5):334-343. PMID: 19055229
5. Gröner A. Virus Retentive Filters - Effective Virus Removal in the Manufacturing Process of Biologicals. Med Res Arch [online] 2024;12(12). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i12.6084
6. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin, Q5A(R2), 1 November 2023. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/ICH_Q5A%28R2%29_Guideline_2023_1101.pdf
7. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management, Q12, 20 November 2019. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q12_Guideline_Step4_2019_1119.pdf
8. Ramnarine E, Vinther A, Bruhin K, et al. Effective management of post-approval changes in the pharmaceutical quality system (PQS)—through enhanced science and risk-based approaches industry One-Voice-of-Quality (1VQ) solutions. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2020.011734
9. Deavon A, Adam S, Ausborn S, et al. Path forward to optimise post-approval change management and facilitate continuous supply of medicines and vaccines of high quality worldwide. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023;57:7–11. doi.org/10.1007/s43441-022-00426-9
10. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Pharmaceutical Development, Q8(R2), August 2009. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q8%28R2%29%20Guideline.pdf
11. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Quality Risk Management, Q9(R1), 18 January 2023. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/ICH_Q9%28R1%29_Guideline_Step4_2025_0115.pdf
12. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Pharmaceutical Quality System, Q10, 4 June 2008. Assessed June 15, 2025
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q10%20Guideline.pdf
13. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Development and Manufacturing of Drug Substances (Chemical Entities and Biotechnological/Biological Entities, Q11, 1 May 2012. Assessed June 15, 2025. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q11%20Guideline.pdf
14. FDA. Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Changes to an Approved Application: Certain Biological Products-Guidance for Industry. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, December 2017. Assessed June 15, 2025. https://www.fda.gov/media/134050/download
15. EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/586330/2010. Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols. 30 March 2012. Assessed June 15, 2025. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/questions-and-answers-post-approval-change-management-protocols_en.pdf
16. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, Q7, 10 November 2000. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q7%20Guideline.pdf
17. TRS 908 – 37th report on the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. Annex 7 – Application of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology to pharmaceuticals. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42613/WHO_TRS_908.pdf?sequence=1
18. Lute S, Bailey M, Combs J, Sukumar M, Brorson K. Phage passage after extended processing in small-virus-retentive filters. [published correction appears in Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2007 Sep;48 (Pt 1):63]. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2007;47(Pt 3):141-151. doi:10.1042/BA20060254
19. Ajayi OO, Johnson SA, Faison T, et al. An updated analysis of viral clearance unit operations for biotechnology manufacturing. Curr Res. Biotechnol. 2022;4:190-202. doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2022.03.002
20. Ajayi OO, Cullinan JL, Basria I, et al. Analysis of virus clearance for biotechnology manufacturing processes from early to late phase development. PDA J Pharm Scie Technol 2025;79_252-70. Doi:10.5731/pdajpst.2025-000001.1
21. Roth NJ, Dichtelmüller HO, Fabbrizzi F, et al. Nanofiltration as a robust method contributing to viral safety of plasma-derived therapeutics: 20 years' experience of the plasma protein manufacturers. Transfusion 2020;60(11):2661-2674. doi: 10.1111/t rf.16022
22. Miesegaes G, Lute S, Brorson K. Analysis of virus clearance unit operations for monoclonal antibodies. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;106(2):238-246. doi:10.1002/bit.22662
23. Afzal MA, Peles J, Zydney AL. Comparative analysis of the impact of protein on virus retention for different virus removal filters. Membranes 2024; 14:158. doi.org/10.3390/membranes14070158
24. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in their Manufacturing Process, Q5E, 18 November 2004. Assessed June 15, 2025.
https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q5E%20Guideline.pdf
25. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Specifications: Test procedures and acceptance criteria for biotechnological/biological products, Q6B, 10 March 1999. Assessed June 15, 2025. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q6B%20Guideline.pdf
26. Kayukawa T, Yanagibashi A, Hongo-Hirasaki T, Yanagida K. Particle-based analysis elucidates the real retention capacities of virus filters and enables optimal virus clearance study design with evaluation systems of diverse virological characteristics. Biotechnol Prog 2022;38:e3237. doi.org/10.1002/b tpr3237