Bridging Uganda’s Emergency Care Skills Gap: Leveraging Virtual Telementorship for Frontline Providers

Main Article Content

Andrew Twineamatsiko Brian Agaba Martin Msukwa Bassim Birkland Geofrey Ssekalembe Jimmy Atyera Prossy Nakattudde John Baptist Nambohe Waniaye Irene Atuhairwe

Abstract

Background: Emergency care conditions, including trauma, acute infections, and obstetric emergencies, significantly contribute to global mortality and morbidity, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Uganda, with a predominantly young and rural population of over 46 million, faces a severe shortage of trained emergency care providers, exacerbating mortality rates in emergency units.


Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes model adopted by Uganda’s Ministry of Health and Seed Global Health in 2021 to bridge the emergency care skills gap among frontline health workers.


Methods: A retrospective program evaluation was conducted using secondary quantitative data analysis covering September 2021 to December 2024 period. Data from participant registrations and pre/post knowledge tests via Zoom sessions were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Power BI.


Results: Between September 2021 and December 2024, 70 bi-weekly telementorship sessions were conducted to 11,805 participants across all 146 Ugandan districts and 66 additional countries with majority coming from East Africa. Participants included general doctors (38%), nurses and midwives (28%), allied health professionals (27%), specialists (4%), and emergency medical technicians (3%). High repeat participation rates and an average attendance duration of 205.5 minutes per session indicated substantial engagement and perceived program value. Immediate knowledge gains were demonstrated through significant improvements in pre- and post-session assessments from 36% to 65%.


Conclusion: The findings highlight the effectiveness and scalability of virtual telementorship in rapidly enhancing emergency care competencies among diverse health professional cadres. The broad geographical and facility-level reach underscores its potential for bridging critical workforce gaps in resource-limited settings. However, the study noted limitations, including potential participation bias and the absence of long-term knowledge retention and patient outcome assessments. Policy recommendations emphasize integrating virtual telementorship into national workforce development strategies, advocating for dedicated funding and infrastructure support to sustain and expand this impactful approach. This initiative demonstrates a feasible and scalable model for improving emergency care knowledge, with strong potential for replication in similar global health contexts.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
TWINEAMATSIKO, Andrew et al. Bridging Uganda’s Emergency Care Skills Gap: Leveraging Virtual Telementorship for Frontline Providers. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 8, aug. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6838>. Date accessed: 05 dec. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i8.6838.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Chang CY, Abujaber S, Reynolds TA, Camargo CA, Obermeyer Z. Burden of emergency conditions and emergency care usage: new estimates from 40 countries. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(11):794-800.
2. Razzak J, Usmani MF, Bhutta ZA. Global, regional and national burden of emergency medical diseases using specific emergency disease indicators: analysis of the 2015 global burden of disease study. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):e000733.
3. Hansoti B, Aluisio AR, Barry MA, et al. Global health and emergency care: defining clinical research priorities. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(6):742-753.
4. Walsh L, Subbarao I, Gebbie K, et al. Core competencies for disaster medicine and public health. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(1):44-52.
5. Lohela TJ, Nesbitt RC, Manu A, et al. Competence of health workers in emergency obstetric care: an assessment using clinical vignettes in Brong Ahafo region, Ghana. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010963.
6. Czabanowska K, Kuhlmann E. Public health competences through the lens of the COVID‐19 pandemic: what matters for health workforce preparedness for global health emergencies. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021;36(S1):14-19.
7. Liu JX, Goryakin Y, Maeda A, Bruckner T, Scheffler R. Global health workforce labor market projections for 2030. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15:1-12.
8. Al-Worafi YM. Healthcare workforce issues in developing countries: Public health and others. In: Handbook of Medical and Health Sciences in Developing Countries: Education, Practice, and Research. Springer; 2023:1-25.
9. UBOS. Demographic and Health survey. Published online 2022. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/UDHS-2022-Report.pdf
10. Seed Global Health. Emergency care systems in Uganda. Published online 2024. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://seedglobalhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Final-Report-Assessment-of-Ems.pdf
11. Kamukama A, Kwesiga B, Migisha R, et al. Assessment of emergency medical services, Uganda, 2020–2023.
12. Böbel S, Verhoeven J, Scholz M, et al. Strengthening the WHO Emergency Care Systems Framework: insights from an integrated, patient-centered approach in the Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services system—a qualitative system analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25(1):401.
13. Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G, et al. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(23):2199-2207.
14. Atuhairwe I, Ngabirano AA, Ahaisibwe B, et al. Leveraging tele-mentoring and remote learning to strengthen the emergency care capacity of health workers in Uganda. Afr J Emerg Med. 2023;13(2):86-93.
15. Scott RE, Mars M. Telehealth in the developing world: current status and future prospects. Smart Homecare Technol TeleHealth. Published online 2015:25-37.
16. Arora S, Kalishman SG, Thornton KA, et al. Project ECHO: a telementoring network model for continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017;37(4):239-244.
17. Struminger B, Arora S, Zalud-Cerrato S, Lowrance D, Ellerbrock T. Building virtual communities of practice for health. The lancet. 2017;390(10095):632-634.
18. Kevin O’Neill D. Building social capital in a knowledge-building community: Telementoring as a catalyst. Interact Learn Environ. 2004;12(3):179-208.
19. Moss P, Nixon P, Baggio S, Newcomb D. Turning strategy into action–using the ECHO model to empower the Australian workforce to integrate care. Int J Integr Care. 2023;23(2):16.
20. Thistlethwaite JE. Interprofessional education and the basic sciences: Rationale and outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(4):299-304.
21. Wanjiku G, Dreizler L, Bell G, Wachira B. Feasibility of project ECHO telementoring to build capacity among non-specialist emergency care providers. Afr J Emerg Med. 2022;12(4):352-357.
22. Bamberger M. Introduction to mixed methods in impact evaluation. Impact Eval Notes. 2012;3(3):1-38.