An Empirical Study of the Interrelations Between Cognitive Style, Coping Strategies, and the Creative Component of Personality in the Context of Stress Management
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: This article examines the interrelationships among cognitive style, coping behavior, and the creative dimension of personality within the framework of stress management.
Aims: This study focuses on the role of cognitive style, coping strategies, and the creative dimension of personality in overcoming stress.
Methods: This study involved a sample of 44 participants. The basic psychodiagnostic methods used were: the Personal Differential Method (A. & B. Pease) assesses whether an individual demonstrates an analytical-logical or emotional-intuitive type of thinking; the Questionnaire for Determining General Emotional Orientation (B. Dodonov) is used to assess the creative component of personality; the “Coping Strategies” Questionnaire by R. Lazarus allows for the assessment of the main forms of coping behavior that a person typically uses in stressful situations; the Gottschaldt Figures Test assesses the cognitive style parameter of field dependence/independence. Statistical analyses of empirical data and graphical presentation of results were conducted using the SPSS v.21.0 statistical software package. To verify the statistical significance of differences in cognitive style and the creative component in the context of stress management, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis H test were applied.
Results: The influence of the cognitive style “field dependence/field independence” and creative components—specifically, “type of thinking” and “emotional orientation”—on respondents’ coping strategies for overcoming stress was analyzed. Through comparative analysis, it was found that 50% of male respondents demonstrated a creative type of thinking, while among female respondents, the distribution was as follows: 47.5% exhibited a creative thinking style, and 37.5% showed a mixed type of thinking. The influence of cognitive style and the creative component of personality on stress coping was analyzed. The results revealed that the creative component has a significant impact on the forms of coping behavior. In particular, emotional orientation significantly influenced the choice of coping strategies, whereas no significant correlation was found between coping behavior and an individual's type of thinking. Analysis of field-dependent/field-independent cognitive styles revealed that the majority of respondents, both male and female, exhibit a field-dependent cognitive style. It was also found that respondents who are neither employed nor enrolled in education, particularly those aged 21–30 and over 46, predominantly display a field-dependent style. The study of coping behavior among men revealed that the confrontational coping strategy is used by them exclusively as an adaptive mechanism. In contrast, for women, the levels of this strategy fall within the moderate to high range. A similar distribution was observed with respect to the location variable: respondents currently residing in Ukraine tended to employ more aggressive coping strategies.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the creative component of personality - specifically, emotional orientation - significantly influences the choice of coping strategies in stressful situations. Individuals with a stronger emotional orientation are more likely to use emotion-focused coping. In contrast, no significant link was found between type of thinking and coping behavior. A field-dependent cognitive style was more common among both male and female respondents, particularly among those not engaged in work or study. Gender and location differences were also identified: men tended to use confrontational strategies adaptively, while respondents living in Ukraine showed a greater tendency toward aggressive coping behavior. These results emphasize the role of individual psychological traits in shaping coping mechanisms.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Kurapov A, Balashevych O, Borodko Y, Vovk Y, Borozenets A, Danyliuk I. Psychological wellbeing of Ukrainian civilians: a data report on the impact of traumatic events on mental health. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1553555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21933
3. Osokina O, Silwal S, Bohdanova T, Hodes M, Sourander A, Skokauskas N. Impact of the Russian invasion on mental health of adolescents in Ukraine. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;62(3):335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.07.845.
4. Asanov AM, Asanov I, Buenstorf G. Mental health and stress level of Ukrainians seeking psychological help online. Heliyon. 2023;9:e21933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21933
5. Plokhikh VV. Relationship between coping behavior and students’ perceptions of the passage of time. Insight Psychol Dimens Soc. 2023;(9):72-93. https://doi.org/10.32999/KSU2663-970X/2023-9-5
6. Shipp AJ, Fried Y, Rousseau DM, Zimbardo PG. New perspectives on time perspective and temporal focus. J Organ Behav. 2020;41(3):235-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2435
7. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur J Pers. 1987;1(3):141-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304
8. Prentice C, Zeidan S, Wang X. Personality, trait EI and coping with COVID-19 measures. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020;51:101789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101789
9. Chebykin O, Sytnik S, Massanov A, Pavlova I. Research on the correlation between emotional-gnostic and personal characteristics with parameters of adolescents’ creativity. Insight Psychol Dimens Soc. 2024;(11):105-122. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2024-11-6
10. Aini M, Narulita E, Indrawati. Enhancing creative thinking and collaboration skills through ILC3 learning model: a case study. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 2020;55(4). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.4.59
11. Tytarenko T. Self-recovery practices of Ukrainian civilians at the beginning of the war: subcultural differences. Insight Psychol Dimens Soc. 2024;(12):338-357. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2024-12-4.
12. Maddi SR. Creating meaning through making decisions. In: Wong PTP, Fry PS, eds. The Human Quest for Meaning: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Clinical Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998:3-26.
13. Tishchenko A, Ushakova I, Selyukova T. Features of decision making and sustainability in the organization among employees with different types of cognitive style of personality: field dependence and field independence. Habitus. 2021;24(1):131-135. https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-5208.2021.24.1.23
14. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
15. Carstensen LL, Mikels JA. At the intersection of emotion and cognition: aging and the positivity effect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005;14:117-121.
16. van der Kolk BA, McFarlane AC, Weisaeth L. Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(97)81866-6
17. Gabrys RL, Tabri N, Anisman H, Matheson K. Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: the cognitive control and flexibility questionnaire. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02219.
18. Blynova O, Popovych I, Hulias I, Radul S, Borozentseva T, Strilets-Babenko O, Minenko O. Psychological safety of the educational space in the structure of motivational orientation of female athletes: a comparative analysis. J Phys Educ Sport. 2022;22(11):2723-2732. http://dx.doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.11346
19. Fahmi Hassan FS. Relationship between coping strategies and thinking styles among university students. ASEAN J Psychiatry. 2014;15(1):14-22. Available from: https://surl.li/myoexa
20. Didkovska LI. Psychological characteristics of coping strategies in adolescence with different social and psychological status in the classroom. Probl Mod Psychol. 2014;24:191-202. Available from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pspl_2014_24_19
21. Voloshok O, Prus S. Behavioral manifestations of coping strategies in adolescence. Young Sci. 2021;1(89):146-151. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2021-1-89-31
22. Perilygina L, Mykhlyuk E. The dynamics of manifestation of professionally caused accentuations in employees of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine. In: Development and Modernization of Social Sciences: Experience of Poland and Prospects of Ukraine. Lublin: Baltija Publishing; 2017:305-322. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2022-2-12
23. Yarmolchyk M, Semenenko L, Dobrovolskyi Y, Poberezhec T. Relationship between personal features and coping strategies in joint force participants. Soc Dev Secur. 2021;11(4):140-148. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2021.11.4.12
24. Stelmashchuk K, Moroz O, Hrabovska S, Partyko T. Personal dispositions as a determinant of coping strategy selection in difficult circumstances. Insight Psychol Dimens Soc. 2023;(10):40-65. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2023-10-3
25. Khraban TE, Silko OV. Combat and military-professional stress: the influence of emotions and emotional states on the choice of coping strategies. Insight Psychol Dimens Soc. 2022;8:71-86. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2022-8-6
26. Dodonov BY. Classification of emotions in the study of the emotional orientation of the personality. Voprosy Psikhologii. 1975;6:21-33.
27. Gottschaldt K. Über den Einfluß der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. Psychol Forsch. 1926;8:261-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02411523
28. Witkin HA, Oltman PK, Raskin E, Karp SA. A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1971. Available from: https://sjdm.org/dmidi/Group_Embedded_Figures_Test.html
29. Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513-524. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513
30. Kirton MJ. Adaption-Innovation: In the Context of Diversity and Change. 1st ed. Routledge; 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203695005.
31. Hayes J, Allinson CW, Hudson RS, Keasey K. Further reflections on the nature of intuition-analysis and the construct validity of the Cognitive Style Index. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2003;76:269-278. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903765913731.
32. Hayes J, Allinson CW. Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Hum Relat. 1998;51:847-871. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016978926688.
33. Zhang LF. Are personality-based intellectual styles culture specific or universal? Front Psychol. 2021;12:717670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717670
34. Grigorenko EL, Sternberg RJ. Thinking styles. In: Saklofske DH, Zeidner M, eds. International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence. Boston, MA: Springer; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_11
35. Tamres LK, Janicki D, Helgeson VS. Sex differences in coping behavior: a meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6(1):2-30. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1
36. Bonanno GA, Chen S, Galatzer-Levy IR. Resilience to potential trauma and adversity through regulatory flexibility. Nat Rev Psychol. 2023;2:663-675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00233-5.
37. Carstensen LL, Isaacowitz DM, Charles ST. Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am Psychol. 1999;54(3):165-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165.
38. Fuller HR, Ajrouch KJ, Antonucci TC. The convoy model and later-life family relationships. J Fam Theory Rev. 2020;12:126-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12376.
39. Antonucci TC, Akiyama H, Adelmann PK. Health behaviors and social roles among mature men and women. J Aging Health. 1990;2(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/089826439000200101.
40. Messick S. The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice. Educ Psychol. 1984;19(2):59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283
41. Nielsen T. Intellectual style theories: different types of categorizations and their relevance for practitioners. SpringerPlus. 2014;3:737. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-737
42. Zhu X, Xu X, Xu C, et al. The interactive effects of stress and coping style on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:523-530. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S181471.