A Study on the Divergence between Psychological Evaluation and Physiological Indices during Art Viewing in Immersive Spaces
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates how immersive spatial environments influence both subjective and physiological responses during digital art appreciation, focusing on potential divergences between conscious evaluation and autonomic nervous system activity. Two contrasting immersive settings were constructed: Immersive Space 1, featuring mirror-based reflections to create visual infinity, and Immersive Space 2, employing large LED panels to eliminate visual self-reflection. Participants viewed identical digital artwork in each space under controlled conditions, while psychological ratings and electrocardiographic (ECG) data were collected simultaneously.
The results revealed no significant differences in subjective ratings across dimensions such as Impression, Relaxation, Motivation, and Creativity. However, ECG data indicated significantly higher parasympathetic activity and reduced sympathetic arousal in Immersive Space 2, suggesting a more relaxed physiological state. This dissociation highlights a crucial aspect of aesthetic experience: that bodily responses may diverge from consciously reported impressions.
These findings underscore the importance of incorporating physiological measures in studies of art perception, particularly in immersive contexts where environmental features subtly modulate internal states. They also point to the value of a multimodal assessment approach in capturing the full complexity of aesthetic experience, offering implications for the design of immersive environments in art, education, and therapeutic applications.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Kreibig SD. Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology. 2010; 84(3):394–421.
3. Mauss IB, Robinson MD. Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition and Emotion. 2009;23(2):209–237.
4. Critchley HD, Harrison NA. Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron, 2013;77(4):624–638.
5. Nakatsu R, Tosa N, Pang Y, Uraoka Y, Kitagawa A, Murata K, Munaka T, Ueda Y, Furuta M, Nomura M. Effect of Art’s Increasing Human Creativity and Motivation When Viewed in An Immersive Environment. Medical Research Archives. 2024;12 (11):1-12.
6. Kitagawa A, Uraoka Y, Furuta M, Munaka T. Human Metrics Explorer System for Multi-Device Physiological Measurements in Emotion Estimation. Proceedings of SII 2024. 2024;184-189.
7. Pang Y, Tamai H, Tosa N, Nakatsu R. Sound of Ikebana: Creation of Media Art Based on Fluid Dynamics. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Education. 2021;8(3):90-102.
8. Ueno Y. Ikebana: The Zen Way of Flowers. Tuttle Publishing. 2023.
9. Nakatsu R, Tosa N, Pang Y, Niiyama S, Uraoka Y, Kitagawa A, Murata K, Munaka T, Ueda Y, Furuta M, Nomura M. Construction of Immersive Art Space and Its Evaluation Using ECG Data. Proceedings of WMSCI2024. 2024.
10. Nakatsu R, Tosa N, Pang Y, Niiyama S, Munaka T, Furuta M, Ueda Y, Nomura M. Construction of Immersive Art Space Using Mirror Display and Its Preliminary Evaluation. Proceedings of WMSCI 2023. 2023;434-439.
11. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology. 2004;95 (4):489–508.
12. Cupchik GC, Vartanian O, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition. 2009;70(1):84–91.
13. Ulrich RS, Simons RF. Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1991;11(3):201–230.
14. Gerber AJ, Kawachi I, Hornig M. (2022). Physiological stress modulation through ambient visual immersion. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13: 832417.
15. Mauss IB, Robinson MD. Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition and Emotion. 2009;23(2):209–237.
16. Kreibig SD. Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology. 2010; 84(3):394–421.
17. Cela-Conde CJ, Marty G, Maestú F, Ortiz T, Munar E, Fernández A, Roca M, Rossello J, Quensney F. Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101(16):6321–6325.
18. Koelsch, S. Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014;15 (3):170–180.
19. Berman, MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science. 2008;19(12):1207–1212.
20. Valtchanov D, Barton KR, Ellard C. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2010;13(5):503–512.
21. Brieber D, Nadal M, Leder H, Rosenberg R. Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99019.
22. Khalfa S, Isabelle P, Jean-Pierre B, Manon R. Event-related skin conductance responses to musical emotions in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 2002; 328(2):145–149.