Nanosecond Pulsed Field Ablation in Oncology
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cancer therapy has evolved significantly over the past three decades and this review focuses on some of the new ablation modalities that have been developed as well as the importance of combination therapies which enlist the immune system. During the late 1990’s various immune system checkpoints were discovered, and inhibitors of those immune checkpoints were found to boost the immune system enough in some patients to eliminate metastases. This revealed the power of the immune system to attack and eliminate tumors. However, for most patients simply inhibiting the immune checkpoints was insufficient and additional therapies were required. Current approaches involve ablation of the primary tumor followed by stimulation of the immune system to pick up tumor antigens released by the ablation and generate cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells to eliminate metastases. Tumor ablation involves the targeted delivery of either thermal or nonthermal energy sufficient to kill the tumor cells. Thermal ablation modalities were the first to be used but recent data suggest that the immune system is more strongly recruited by nonthermal modalities which have the additional advantage of sparing acellular structures such as neighboring nerves and blood vessels. We reviewed two studies that compared the efficacy of thermal with that of nonthermal ablation and concentrate on our progress using nanosecond pulsed field ablation. Recent studies that combine ablation with the injection of immune stimulants have shown that combination therapies are the most effective. Combining nsPFA with the intratumoral injection of immune stimulants boosts the immune system sufficiently to eliminate untreated tumors or metastases. We review the immune stimulants currently being used in preclinical studies and summarize the two clinical studies conducted thus far using nanosecond pulsed field ablation (nsPFA).
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Mc Neil V, Lee SW. Advancing Cancer Treatment: A Review of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Combination Strategies. Cancers 2025;17.
3. Engelen Y, Demuynck R, Ramon J, et al. Immunogenic cell death as interplay between physical anticancer modalities and immunotherapy. J Control Release 2025;384:113721.
4. Ma J, Wei Z, Ye X. Interventional oncology and immunotherapy: current status and future perspectives. Front Immunol 2025;16:1541105.
5. Xu Z, Hall TL, Vlaisavljevich E, Lee FT, Jr. Histotripsy: the first noninvasive, non-ionizing, non-thermal ablation technique based on ultrasound. Int J Hyperthermia 2021;38:561-575.
6. Xu Z, Khokhlova TD, Cho CS, Khokhlova VA. Histotripsy: A Method for Mechanical Tissue Ablation with Ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2024;26: 141-167.
7. Neumann E, Rosenheck K. Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes. J Membr Biol 1972;10:279-290.
8. Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:223-231.
9. George AK, Miocinovic R, Patel AR, et al. A Description and Safety Overview of Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Tissue Ablation in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results from the PRESERVE Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16.
10. Narayanan G, Bilimoria MM, Hosein PJ, Su Z, Mortimer KM, Martin RCG, 2nd. Multicenter randomized controlled trial and registry study to assess the safety and efficacy of the NanoKnife® system for the ablation of stage 3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma: overview of study protocols. BMC Cancer 2021;21:785.
11. Yilmaz M, Karaaslan M, Şirin ME, et al. Salvage irreversible electroporation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024.
12. Partridge BR, O'Brien TJ, Lorenzo MF, et al. High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation for Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer: A Proof-of-Principle Study in Canine Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020;31:482-491.e484.
13. O'Brien TJ, Passeri M, Lorenzo MF, et al. Experimental High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Using a Single-Needle Delivery Approach for Nonthermal Pancreatic Ablation In Vivo. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019;30:854-862.e857.
14. Pakhomov AG, Shevin R, White JA, et al. Membrane permeabilization and cell damage by ultrashort electric field shocks. Arch Biochem Biophys 2007;465:109-118.
15. Vernier PT. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization with nanosecond electric pulses. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011;2011:743-5.:743-745.
16. Ren W, Sain NM, Beebe SJ. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) activate intrinsic caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death in Jurkat cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 421:808-812.
17. Tang D, Kang R, Berghe TV, Vandenabeele P, Kroemer G. The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res 2019;29:347-364.
18. Mendiratta-Lala M, Wiggermann P, Pech M, et al. The #HOPE4LIVER Single-Arm Pivotal Trial for Histotripsy of Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors. Radiology 2024;312:e233051.
19. Sandilos G, Butchy MV, Koneru M, Gongalla S, Sensenig R, Hong YK. Histotripsy - hype or hope? Review of innovation and future implications. J Gastrointest Surg 2024;28:1370-1375.
20. Song B, Queen H, Ferris SF, et al. Histotripsy-Focused Ultrasound Treatment Abrogates Tumor Hypoxia Responses and Stimulates Antitumor Immune Responses in Melanoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24:1088-1098.
21. Thim EA, Kitelinger LE, Rivera-Escalera F, et al. Focused ultrasound ablation of melanoma with boiling histotripsy yields abscopal tumor control and antigen-dependent dendritic cell activation. Theranostics 2024;14:1647-1661.
22. Nuccitelli R, Martinez M, Kaufman D, Mehregan D, Johnston L, Knape WA. Nano-Pulse Stimulation Therapy Initiates Regulated Cell Death in Skin, Unlike Bovie Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoablation. Bioelectricity 2024;6:167-173.
23. McDaniel A, Freimark B, Navarro C, et al. Nano-pulse stimulationTM therapy (NPSTM) is superior to cryoablation in clearing murine melanoma tumors. Front Oncol 2022;12:948472.
24. Nuccitelli R, McDaniel A, Connolly R, Zelickson B, Hartman H. Nano-Pulse Stimulation Induces Changes in the Intracellular Organelles in Rat Liver Tumors Treated In Situ. Lasers Surg Med 2020;52: 882-889.
25. Nuccitelli R, McDaniel A, Anand S, et al. Nano-Pulse Stimulation is a physical modality that can trigger immunogenic tumor cell death. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2017;5:32.
26. Polajžer T, Miklavčič D. Immunogenic Cell Death in Electroporation-Based Therapies Depends on Pulse Waveform Characteristics. Vaccines (Basel) 2023;11.
27. Nuccitelli R, Berridge JC, Mallon Z, Kreis M, Athos B, Nuccitelli P. Nanoelectroablation of Murine Tumors Triggers a CD8-Dependent Inhibition of Secondary Tumor Growth. PLoS One 2015;10:e01 34364.
28. Nuccitelli R, McDaniel A. Nano-Pulse Stimulation Therapy in Oncology. Bioelectricity 2024;6:72-79.
29. McDaniel A, Rothstein KV, Gonzalez D, Nuccitelli R. Nano-Pulse Stimulation Treatment Inhibits Pan02 Murine Pancreatic Tumor Growth and Induces a Long-Term Adaptive Immune Response with Abscopal Effects When Combined with Immune-Enhancing Agents. Bioelectricity 2024;6:108-117.
30. Hong WX, Sagiv-Barfi I, Czerwinski DK, Sallets A, Levy R. Neoadjuvant Intratumoral Immunotherapy with TLR9 Activation and Anti-OX40 Antibody Eradicates Metastatic Cancer. Cancer Res 2022; 82:1396-1408.
31. Shree T, Czerwinski D, Haebe S, et al. A Phase I Clinical Trial Adding OX40 Agonism to In Situ Therapeutic Cancer Vaccination in Patients with Low-Grade B-cell Lymphoma Highlights Challenges in Translation from Mouse to Human Studies. Clin Cancer Res 2025;31:868-880.
32. Som A, Rosenboom JG, Wehrenberg-Klee E, et al. Percutaneous Intratumoral Immunoadjuvant Gel Increases the Abscopal Effect of Cryoablation for Checkpoint Inhibitor Resistant Cancer. Advanced healthcare materials 2024;13:e2301848.
33. Lopez-Beltran A, Cookson MS, Guercio BJ, Cheng L. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. Bmj 2024;384:e076743.
34. Lemdani K, Mignet N, Boudy V, et al. Local immunomodulation combined to radiofrequency ablation results in a complete cure of local and distant colorectal carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2019;8:1550342.
35. Seguin J, El Hajjam M, Legagneux J, et al. Radiofrequency Combined with Intratumoral Immunotherapy: Preclinical Results and Safety in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma. Pharmaceutics 2024;16.
36. Shankara Narayanan JS, Hayashi T, Erdem S, et al. Treatment of pancreatic cancer with irreversible electroporation and intratumoral CD40 antibody stimulates systemic immune responses that inhibit liver metastasis in an orthotopic model. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2023;11.
37. Iwai T, Oebisu N, Hoshi M, et al. Promising abscopal effect of combination therapy with thermal tumour ablation and intratumoural OK-432 injection in the rat osteosarcoma model. Scientific reports 2020;10:9679.
38. Nuccitelli R, Pliquett U, Chen X, et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields cause melanomas to self-destruct. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;343:351-360.
39. Nuccitelli R, Chen X, Pakhomov AG, et al. A new pulsed electric field therapy for melanoma disrupts the tumor's blood supply and causes complete remission without recurrence. Int J Cancer 2009;125:438-445.
40. Nuccitelli R, Tran K, Sheikh S, Athos B, Kreis M, Nuccitelli P. Optimized nanosecond pulsed electric field therapy can cause murine malignant melanomas to self-destruct with a single treatment. Int J Cancer 2010;127:1727-1736.
41. Nuccitelli R, Tran K, Lui K, et al. Non-thermal Nanoelectroablation of UV-Induced Murine Melanomas Stimulates an Immune Response. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2012;25:618-629.
42. Pliquett U, Nuccitelli R. Measurement and simulation of Joule heating during treatment of B-16 melanoma tumors in mice with nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Bioelectrochemistry 2014;100:62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.03.001. Epub@2014 Mar 12.:62-68.
43. Chen R, Sain NM, Harlow KT, et al. A protective effect after clearance of orthotopic rat hepatocellular carcinoma by nanosecond pulsed electric fields. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2014;50:2705-2713.
44. Chen X, Yin S, Hu C, et al. Comparative study of nanosecond electric fields in vitro and in vivo on hepatocellular carcinoma indicate macrophage infiltration contribute to tumor ablation in vivo. PloS one 2014;9:e86421.
45. Guo F, Yao C, Li C, Mi Y, Peng Q, Tang J. In vivo evidences of nanosecond pulsed electric fields for melanoma malignancy treatment on tumor-bearing BALB/c nude mice. Technology in cancer research & treatment 2014;13:337-344.
46. Nuccitelli R, Wood R, Kreis M, et al. First-in-human trial of nanoelectroablation therapy for basal cell carcinoma: proof of method. Exp Dermatol 2014;23:135-137.
47. Pliquett U, Nuccitelli R. Measurement and simulation of Joule heating during treatment of B-16 melanoma tumors in mice with nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Bioelectrochemistry 2014;100:62-68.
48. Wu S, Wang Y, Guo J, Chen Q, Zhang J, Fang J. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields as a novel drug free therapy for breast cancer: an in vivo study. Cancer Lett 2014;343:268-274.
49. Yin S, Chen X, Hu C, et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a novel locoregional ablation decreasing lung metastasis. Cancer Lett 2014;346:285-291.
50. Nuccitelli R, Berridge JC, Mallon Z, Kreis M, Athos B, Nuccitelli P. Nanoelectroablation of Murine Tumors Triggers a CD8-Dependent Inhibition of Secondary Tumor Growth. PloS one 2015;10:e013 4364.
51. Muratori C, Pakhomov AG, Xiao S, Pakhomova ON. Electrosensitization assists cell ablation by nanosecond pulsed electric field in 3D cultures. Scientific reports 2016;6:23225.
52. Chen X, Chen Y, Jiang J, et al. Nano-pulse stimulation (NPS) ablate tumors and inhibit lung metastasis on both canine spontaneous osteosarcoma and murine transplanted hepatocellular carcinoma with high metastatic potential. Oncotarget 2017;8: 44032-44039.
53. Chen X, Zhang R, Aji T, Shao Y, Chen Y, Wen H. Novel Interventional Management of Hepatic Hydatid Cyst with Nanosecond Pulses on Experimental Mouse Model. Scientific reports 2017;7:4491.
54. Dai J, Wu S, Kong Y, et al. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Enhance the Anti-tumour Effects of the mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus against Melanoma. Scientific reports 2017;7:39597.
55. Muratori C, Pakhomov AG, Heller L, et al. Electrosensitization Increases Antitumor Effectiveness of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields In Vivo. Technology in cancer research & treatment 2017; 16:987-996.
56. Edelblute CM, Guo S, Hornef J, et al. Moderate Heat Application Enhances the Efficacy of Nanosecond Pulse Stimulation for the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Technology in cancer research & treatment 2018;17:1533033818802305.
57. Guo S, Burcus NI, Hornef J, et al. Nano-Pulse Stimulation for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer and the Changes in Immune Profile. Cancers (Basel) 2018;10.
58. Semenov I, Casciola M, Ibey BL, Xiao S, Pakhomov AG. Electropermeabilization of cells by closely spaced paired nanosecond-range pulses. Bioelectrochemistry 2018;121:135-141.
59. Zhang B, Kuang D, Tang X, Mi Y, Luo Q, Song G. Effect of Low-Field High-Frequency nsPEFs on the Biological Behaviors of Human A375 Melanoma Cells. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 2018;65:2093-2100.
60. Rossi A, Pakhomova ON, Mollica PA, et al. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields Induce Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Accompanied by Immunogenic Cell Death in Murine Models of Lymphoma and Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2019;11.
61. Rossi A, Pakhomova ON, Pakhomov AG, et al. Mechanisms and immunogenicity of nsPEF-induced cell death in B16F10 melanoma tumors. Scientific reports 2019;9:431.
62. Wang Y, Yin S, Zhou Y, et al. Dual-function of Baicalin in nsPEFs-treated Hepatocytes and Hepatocellular Carcinoma cells for Different Death Pathway and Mitochondrial Response. International journal of medical sciences 2019;16:1271-1282.
63. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Chen J, Wu Y, Zhang J, Wang J. Nanosecond pulsed electric field inhibits malignant melanoma growth by inducing the change of systemic immunity. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 2019;24:e555-e561.
64. Qian J, Chen T, Wu Q, et al. Blocking exposed PD-L1 elicited by nanosecond pulsed electric field reverses dysfunction of CD8(+) T cells in liver cancer. Cancer Lett 2020;495:1-11.
65. Qian J, Liu J, Hong L, et al. Upregulation of PDGF Mediates Robust Liver Regeneration after Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field Ablation by Promoting the HGF/c-Met Pathway. BioMed research international 2020;2020:3635787.
66. Yimingjiang M, Tuergan T, Chen X, et al. Comparative Analysis of Immunoactivation by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields and PD-1 Blockade in Murine Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2020;2020:9582731.
67. Liu H, Zhao Y, Yao C, Schmelz EM, Davalos RV. Differential effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on cells representing progressive ovarian cancer. Bioelectrochemistry 2021;142:107942.
68. Pakhomov AG, Gudvangen E, Xiao S, Semenov I. Interference targeting of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses for spatially focused electroporation, electrostimulation, and tissue ablation. Bioelectrochemistry 2021;141:107876.
69. Taibi A, Perrin ML, Albouys J, et al. 10 ns PEFs induce a histological response linked to cell death and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in an immunocompetent mouse model of peritoneal metastasis. Clin Transl Oncol 2021;23:1220-1237.
70. Zhao J, Xu M, Sun R, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation induced myeloid cells remodeling in pancreatic cancer. Bioelectrochemistry 2022;148:108266.
71. Liu J, Fang C, Jin X, et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation-induced modulation of sphingolipid metabolism is associated with Ly6c2(+) mononuclear phagocyte differentiation in liver cancer. Mol Oncol 2023;17:1093-1111.
72. Xu Z, Pan C, Chen L, et al. Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field Induces an Antitumor Effect in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer via CXCL9 Axis Dependence in Mice. Cancers 2023;15.
73. Zou Y, Sun Y, Chen X, et al. Nanosecond pulse effectively ablated hepatocellular carcinoma with alterations in the gut microbiome and serum metabolites. Front Pharmacol 2023;14:1163628.
74. Mazzarda F, Chittams-Miles AE, Pittaluga J, Sözer EB, Vernier PT, Muratori C. Inflammasome Activation and IL-1β Release Triggered by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields in Murine Innate Immune Cells and Skin. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2024;212:335-345.
75. Qian J, Ding L, Wu Q, et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric field stimulates CD103(+) DC accumulation in tumor microenvironment via NK-CD103(+) DC crosstalk. Cancer Lett 2024;593:216514.
76. Liang YY, Lu Z, Liu HW, et al. Anti-tumor effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields in a murine model of pancreatic cancer. Bioelectrochemistry 2025;161:108803.
77. Guo S, Jing Y, Burcus NI, et al. Nano-pulse stimulation induces potent immune responses, eradicating local breast cancer while reducing distant metastases. International journal of cancer 2017; 142:629-640.
78. Nuccitelli R, Wood R, Kreis M, et al. First-in-human trial of nanoelectroablation therapy for basal cell carcinoma: proof of method. Exp Dermatol 2014;23:135-137.
79. Ross AS, Schlesinger T, Harmon CB, et al. Multicenter, prospective feasibility study of Nano-Pulse StimulationTM technology for the treatment of both nodular and superficial low-risk basal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2022;12:1044694.
80. Xu M, Xu D, Dong G, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase 1 Clinical Study Protocol. Front Oncol 2022;12:86 9316.
81. Xu M, Zhang W, Xu D, et al. Nanosecond pulsed electric field ablation as first-line curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations a prospective multicenter. Int J Surg 2025; 111:3289-3298.
82. Kaufman D, Martinez M, Jauregui L, et al. A dose-response study of a novel method of selective tissue modification of cellular structures in the skin with nanosecond pulsed electric fields. Lasers Surg Med 2020;52:315-322.