Fostering Civil Discourse and Collaboration in Academic Medicine: A Comprehensive Intervention Approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Rising global political polarization and distrust are impacting academic medicine. Intensified by events like COVID-19 and social unrest, these factors are leading to incivility, communication breakdowns, and compromised patient care. Restorative practice and civil discourse offer potential solutions by emphasizing community building and communication. This article describes a novel faculty development curriculum integrating Restorative Practice and civil discourse to enhance communication and conflict resolution.
Methods: We developed "Community Building for Civil Discourse," a curriculum designed as a series of full-day, off-campus faculty development retreats. These retreats blended restorative practice principles with civil discourse models, aiming to enhance communication skills and foster connections among staff and faculty. We used pre- and post-surveys to assess knowledge acquisition, retreat effectiveness, and sense of belonging/hope, supplemented by qualitative data on experiences and challenges.
Results: Two hundred ninety-four interprofessional individuals participated, demonstrating broad engagement. Post-retreat, 81% reported increased understanding of both reflective practice and civil discourse, 72.3% felt confident in applying community building skills, and 64% were confident in conducting civil discourse. Notably, 54% reported a high increase in belonging, and 74.9% expressed high levels of hope for the institution's future. An overwhelming 88% deemed the retreat an effective use of time.
Conclusion: The challenges of polarization in academic medicine necessitate proactive interventions. Our findings emphasize the value of integrating Tier 1 Restorative Practice and civil discourse in fostering dialogue and belonging. This faculty development curriculum provides an evidence-based foundation for navigating contemporary academic complexities, enabling institutions to prevent harm, foster healing, and cultivate a more collaborative environment.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Caravaca F, González-Cabañas J, Cuevas Á, Cuevas R. Estimating ideology and polarization in European countries using Facebook data. EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):56.
3. Lane SR, Loya N, LeClere M. Collective response to the 2020 COVID-19, racial injustice, and political polarization triad: case studies for social work education. J Prog Hum Serv. 2024:1-23. doi:10.1080/10428232.2024.2323049.
4. Abate LE, Greenberg L. Incivility in medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):24.
5. Lewis C. The impact of interprofessional incivility on medical performance, service and patient care: a systematic review. Future Healthc J. 2023;10(1):69-77.
6. Stevens H, Rasul ME, Oh YJ. Emotions and incivility in vaccine mandate discourse: natural language processing insights. JMIR Infodemiol. 2022;2(2): e37635.
7. Stearns S, Mangan-Friel J, Cushman J. Cultivating Civil Discourse: A Guide for Adults and Youth. University of Connecticut Extension; 2024. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://publications.extension.uconn.edu/publication/civil-discourse/.
8. Sheffield SLM, Timmermans JA. Creating a collaborative community spirit for the future of academic development. Int J Acad Dev. 2021;26(2):117-120.
9. Sawin G, Sawin V, Wachtel T, et al. Scoping review of restorative justice in academics and medicine: a powerful tool for justice equity diversity and inclusion. Health Equity. 2023;7(1):663-675.
10. Acosta D, Karp DR. Restorative justice as the Rx for mistreatment in academic medicine: applications to consider for learners, faculty, and staff. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):354-356.
11. Wachtel T. Defining Restorative. International Institute for Restorative Practices; 2012. Accessed August 11, 2025. https://rpforschools.net/articles/Theory/Wachtel%202012%20Defining%20Restorative.pdf.
12. Karp DR. Restorative Justice for College and University. Good Books; 2019.
13. Shetty N, Fakhoury J, Lopez S, et al. Building a trauma-informed community: applying community building circles to an academic health research setting. Acad Med. 2024;99(2):164-168.
14. Donovan EC. Civil discourse as a teaching strategy in nursing. Nurse Educ. 2024;49(4):230-231.