The Moderating Role of Social Support in the Association between Diabetes Distress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Rural Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published Sep 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i9.6918

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

Sweta Mahato
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr., Morgantown, WV 26505-9190, United States of America; [email protected]
Sijin Wen
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 64 Medical Center Dr., Morgantown, WV 26505-9190, United States of America
Ranjita Misra
College of Nursing; University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612

Abstract

Introduction: West Virginia, a rural and entirely Appalachian state, has the highest prevalence of diabetes in the U.S., which is associated with higher diabetes distress and lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Yet, few studies have explored the nuanced role of social support as a buffer against distress, that is pivotal in designing effective interventions. Therefore, this study explored the moderating effect of social support between diabetes distress (total and its four domains) and HRQoL among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in West Virginia.


Methods: This statewide cross-sectional study of T2DM individuals was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2021- December 2022) using an online REDCap survey. Participants completed socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, educational status, income, and rural residence) along with the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17), the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS-10) and a single-item measure of social support. Linear regression analyses estimated the association between HRQoL (outcome variable), diabetes distress (exposure variable) and its four domains (regimen-related, physician-related, interpersonal, and emotional burden) and interaction of social support and diabetes distress, adjusting for age, gender, race, education, income, diabetes duration and rural residence.


Results: A total of 1,026 participants (mean age=58.40 ± 12.54; 63.20% female) were included in the analysis. About half of the participants resided in rural areas and had low socio-economic status (i.e., 25% reported an annual income below $25,000 and 19% had a college degree). Participants had lower mean T-scores for global physical health (40.70 ± 9.20) and global mental health (41.50 ± 10.10) compared to the general U.S. population. Most participants (92.90%) reported having social support and low to moderate diabetes distress. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant moderating effect of physician-related distress on global mental health with social support having a protective role that buffered the negative impact of physician-related distress on global mental health.


Conclusion: Findings indicated that HRQoL was lower than the US population average among individuals with T2DM in West Virginia. Additionally, social support ameliorated the negative effects of physician-related distress on global mental health highlighting its protective role.

Keywords: Diabetes Distress, Health-Related Quality of Life, Social support, Appalachia, Diabetes

Article Details

How to Cite
MAHATO, Sweta; WEN, Sijin; MISRA, Ranjita. The Moderating Role of Social Support in the Association between Diabetes Distress and Health-Related Quality of Life in Rural Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 9, sep. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6918>. Date accessed: 06 dec. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i9.6918.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 13 No 9 (2025): Vol.13, Issue 9, September 2025
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Gonzalez JS, Hood KK, Esbitt SA, Mukherji S, Kane NS, Jacobson A. Psychiatric and psychosocial issues among individuals living with diabetes. 2021.

2. Riise HK, Haugstvedt A, Igland J, et al. Diabetes distress and associated psychosocial factors in type 2 diabetes. A population-based cross-sectional study. The HUNT study, Norway. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2025;17(1):62.

3. Moawd SA. Quality of life in university students with diabetes distress: Type 1 and type 2 of diabetes differences. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2022;2022.

4. Onu DU, Ifeagwazi CM, Prince OA. Social support buffers the impacts of Diabetes distress on health-related quality of life among type 2 diabetic patients. Journal of Health Psychology. 2022;27(10):2305-2317.

5. Berry E, Lockhart S, Davies M, Lindsay JR, Dempster M. Diabetes distress: understanding the hidden struggles of living with diabetes and exploring intervention strategies. Postgraduate medical journal. 2015;91(1075):278-283.

6. Dunn S, Smartt H, Beeney L, Turtle J. Measurement of emotional adjustment in diabetic patients: validity and reliability of ATT39. Diabetes Care. 1986;9(5):480-489.

7. Nakahara R, Yoshiuchi K, Kumano H, Hara Y, Suematsu H, Kuboki T. Prospective study on influence of psychosocial factors on glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Psychosomatics. 2006;47(3):240-246.

8. McCoy MA, Theeke LA. A systematic review of the relationships among psychosocial factors and coping in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. International journal of nursing sciences. 2019;6(4):468-477.

9. Shayeghian Z, Aguilar-Vafaie ME, Besharat MA, et al. Self-care activities and glycated haemoglobin in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes: can coping styles and social support have a buffering role? Psychology & Health. 2015;30(2):153-164.

10. DS A, R S, B R, AK K, YJ C, Tang S ea. Diabetes Distress Among US Adults with Diagnosed Diabetes. https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2025/24_0287.htm. Published 2021. Accessed May 18, 2025.

11. Mommersteeg PM, Herr R, Zijlstra WP, Schneider S, Pouwer F. Higher levels of psychological distress are associated with a higher risk of incident diabetes during 18 year follow-up: results from the British household panel survey. BMC public health. 2012; 12:1-10.

12. Wojujutari AK, Idemudia ES, Ugwu LE. Psychological resilience mediates the relationship between diabetes distress and depression among persons with diabetes in a multi-group analysis. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):6510.

13. Beverly EA, Osowik F. Clinically significant depressive symptoms and high diabetes distress in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Appalachian Ohio. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2021;121 (10):813-824.

14. Tareen RS, Tareen K. Psychosocial aspects of diabetes management: dilemma of diabetes distress. Translational pediatrics. 2017;6(4):383.

15. Skinner TC, Joensen L, Parkin T. Twenty‐five years of diabetes distress research. Diabetic Medicine. 2020;37(3):393-400.

16. Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Hessler D. Addressing diabetes distress in clinical care: a practical guide. Diabetic Medicine. 2019;36(7):803-812.

17. Abd El Kader AI, Ibrahim ME, Mohamed HS, Osman BM. Diabetes distress and self-care activities among patients with diabetes type II: a correlation study. SAGE Open Nursing. 2023;9:2377960823 1189944.

18. Fisher L, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow RE, Hessler D, Masharani U. Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes care. 2010;33(1):23-28.

19. Park H-S, Cho Y, Seo DH, et al. Impact of diabetes distress on glycemic control and diabetic complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):5568.

20. Zhu Y, Fish AF, Li F, Liu L, Lou Q. Psychosocial factors not metabolic control impact the quality of life among patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Acta diabetologica. 2016;53:535-541.

21. Chew B-H, Mohd-Sidik S, Shariff-Ghazali S. Negative effects of diabetes–related distress on health-related quality of life: an evaluation among the adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in three primary healthcare clinics in Malaysia. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2015;13:1-16.

22. Jannoo Z, Wah YB, Lazim AM, Hassali MA. Examining diabetes distress, medication adherence, diabetes self-care activities, diabetes-specific quality of life and health-related quality of life among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology. 2017;9:48-54.

23. Chen H, Taichman DB, Doyle RL. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 2008;5(5):623-630.

24. Trikkalinou A, Papazafiropoulou AK, Melidonis A. Type 2 diabetes and quality of life. World journal of diabetes. 2017;8(4):120.

25. Delamater AM, Marrero DG. Behavioral diabetes. Springer; 2020.

26. Bowen PG, Clay OJ, Lee LT, Vice J, Ovalle F, Crowe M. Associations of social support and self-efficacy with quality of life in older adults with diabetes. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2015;41(12):21-29.

27. Gallegos-Carrillo K, García-Peña C, Durán-Muñoz CA, Flores YN, Salmerón J. Relationship between social support and the physical and mental wellbeing of older Mexican adults with diabetes. Revista de investigacion clinica. 2009;61(5):383-391.

28. Göz F, Karaoz S, Goz M, Ekiz, S Cetin, I. Effects of the diabetic patients' perceived social support on their quality‐of‐life. Journal of clinical nursing. 2007;16(7):1353-1360.

29. Cassel J. The contribution of the social environment to host resistance: the Fourth Wade Hampton Frost Lecture. American journal of epidemiology. 1976;104(2):107-123.

30. Barrera Jr M. Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American journal of community psychology. 1986;14(4):413-445.

31. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Barrera Jr M, Strycker LA. The Chronic Illness Resources Survey: cross-validation and sensitivity to intervention. Health Education Research. 2005;20(4):402-409.

32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NCfCDPaHP, Division of Population Health. BRFSS Prevalence & Trends Data. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/brfssprevalence/. Accessed October 28, 2024.

33. Barker LE, Kirtland KA, Gregg EW, Geiss LS, Thompson TJ. Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the US: a diabetes belt. American journal of preventive medicine. 2011;40(4):434-439.

34. Halverson JA, Bischak G. Underlying socioeconomic factors influencing health disparities in the Appalachian region. Washington, DC: Appalachian Regional Commission. 2008.

35. Misra R, Shawley-Brzoska S, Khan R, Kirk BO, Wen S, Sambamoorthi U. Addressing diabetes distress in self-management programs: results of a randomized feasibility study. Journal of Appalachian health. 2021;3(3):68.

36. Kurani SS, Lampman MA, Funni SA, et al. Association between area-level socioeconomic deprivation and diabetes care quality in US primary care practices. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(12): e2138438-e2138438.

37. Foss R, Fischer K, Lampman MA, et al. Disparities in diabetes care: differences between rural and urban patients within a large health system. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2023;21(3):234-239.

38. Center RHR. RUCA data.
https://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-approx.php. Accessed May 18, 2025.

39. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes care. 2005;28 (3):626-631.

40. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of life Research. 2009;18:873-880.

41. Quandt SA, Graham CN, Bell RA, et al. Ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life among older rural adults with diabetes. Ethnicity & disease. 2007;17(3):471.

42. Norris S, Zhang X, Chowdhury F, Zhang P. Health related quality of life measured by SF-36 for adults with diabetes: a meta–analysis. Ottawa: Cochrane Collaboration. 2004;111.

43. Riess H, Kelley JM, Bailey RW, Dunn EJ, Phillips M. Empathy training for resident physicians: a randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. Journal of general internal medicine. 2012;27(10):1280-1286.

44. Taylor SE. Social support: A review. The Oxford handbook of health psychology. 2011;1:189-214.

45. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.

46. Uchida Y, Kitayama S, Mesquita B, Reyes JAS, Morling B. Is perceived emotional support beneficial? Well-being and health in independent and interdependent cultures. Personality and social psychology bulletin. 2008;34(6):741-754.

47. Maisel NC, Gable SL. The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science. 2009;20(8):928-932.

48. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of health and social behavior. 2011;52(2):145-161.

49. Gucciardi E, Reynolds E, Karam G, Beanlands H, Sidani S, Espin S. Group-based storytelling in disease self-management among people with diabetes. Chronic Illness. 2021;17(3):306-320.