Post-Pandemic Dynamics of Mobile Health and Fitness Applications: An Analysis of User Profiles, Market Developments, and Emerging Trends
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The proliferation of digital technologies and the widespread adoption of smartphones have catalyzed a profound transformation in healthcare delivery, particularly through mobile fitness and health applications. Initially emerging in the early 2000s, these applications have evolved since the 2010s into multifaceted platforms offering nutrition planning, exercise motivation, health monitoring, and social interaction functionalities. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated this trend, as the global demand for home-based exercise solutions and remote health monitoring surged, resulting in a substantial increase in application usage. These tools hold considerable potential to enhance quality of life, foster health consciousness, and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems. However, challenges persist regarding user expectation alignment, data security assurance, and the maintenance of long-term user engagement.
Methods: This study employed a qualitative research design, utilizing document analysis to examine mobile fitness and health applications available in the Google Play Store and Apple App Store between 2020 and 2025, specifically those with user ratings between 4.5 and 5.0. The analysis focused on the post-pandemic status of these applications, user demographics, market size, health-promoting impacts, and common challenges encountered. Data sources included peer-reviewed academic publications, industry reports, and official statistical databases. The collected data were subjected to systematic content analysis, and contemporary literature findings were compared with prevailing trends in the digital health sector.
Results: Based on the findings, the distribution of health and fitness mobile applications indicates that the majority of the applications are free (%73.2), and their total number of downloads (1,244,678,160) is significantly higher compared to paid applications (%88.43). Regarding publication years, applications released between 2020 and 2025 (%51.6) stand out in terms of total downloads. In terms of rating ranges, the highest proportion (%22.9) corresponds to applications rated 4.8, which have been downloaded 389,387,020 times. Concerning gender targeting, most applications are unisex (%70.6), while applications targeting women (%22.9) and men (%6.5) are relatively limited. When comparing applications released before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, those published after the pandemic (%52.3) account for a higher share of total downloads. Categorized by download numbers, 29.4% of the applications have reached 10 million or more downloads. In terms of content type, the largest share (%62.7) belongs to the Fitness and Health category. Analysis of total downloads between free and paid applications shows a dominance of free applications (%88.43). Regarding revenue, most applications (%69.23) generate monthly income between 0–100,000 TL, while only 30.77% achieve 100,000 TL or more. The first published application in the health and fitness category was Adidas Running: Run Tracker on November 23, 2010, and the most recent application is Vizzta, released on March 11, 2025. Overall, these findings indicate a significant increase in the use of health and fitness applications in recent years, with free and unisex applications playing a key role in user preferences.
Conclusion: Mobile fitness and health applications occupy a strategically significant position in promoting quality of life and advancing digital health literacy. Nevertheless, there remains a need for strategic innovations to address sustained user retention, data privacy safeguards, and seamless integration into healthcare systems. Additionally, the integration of these applications with wearable technologies, coupled with personalized service delivery through advanced data analytics, presents promising opportunities to enhance user experience and interaction.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. DiFilippo KN, Huang WH, Andrade JE, Chapman-Novakofski KM. The use of mobile apps to improve nutrition outcomes: a systematic literature review. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(5):243-253. doi:10.11 77/1357633X15572203
3. Paramastri R, Pratama SA, Ho DKN, Purnamasari SD, Mohammed AZ, Galvin CJ, Iqbal U. Use of mobile applications to improve nutrition behaviour: a systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;192:105459. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.20 20.105459
4. Bacigalupo R, Cudd P, Littlewood C, Bissell P, Hawley MS, Buckley WH. Interventions employing mobile technology for overweight and obesity: an early systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2013;14(4):279-291. doi:10.111 1/obr.12006
5. Mumcu HE. Fitness-related on health mobile applications during COVID-19: case of Turkey. Prog Nutr. 2021;23:e2021173. doi:10.23751/pn.v23i3.1 2296
6. Intille SS, Lester J, Sallis JF, Duncan G. New horizons in sensor development. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl 1):S24-S31. doi:10.1249/M SS.0b013e3182399c7d
7. Pires IM, Marques G, Garcia NM, Flórez-Revuelta F, Ponciano V, Oniani S. A research on the classification and applicability of the mobile health applications. J Pers Med. 2020;10(1):11. doi:10.33 90/jpm10010011
8. Dallinga JM, Mennes M, Alpay L, Bijwaard H, Baart de la Faille-Deutekom M. App use, physical activity and healthy lifestyle: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:833. doi:10.1186/s128 89-015-2165-8
9. Stephens J, Allen J. Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013;28(4): 320-329. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e318250a3e7
10. Store A. HelpDiabetes on the App Store. Apple; 2023. Available from:
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/helpdiabetes/id551831317
11. Verhoeven A. Everything you need to develop your fitness app marketing plan. Adjust; 2020. Available from:
https://www.adjust.com/blog/fitness-app-marketing-plan/
12. McLean G, Osei-Frimpong K, Al-Nabhani K, Marriott H. Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers’ m-commerce mobile applications–An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective. J Bus Res. 2020;106:139-157. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.201 9.08.045
13. Pavel P, Lukas J, Jan Z. Mobile apps that support physical activities and potential of these applications in physical education at school. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2016;11(1):176-194. doi:10.14198/jhs e.2016.111.16
14. Spring B, Schneider K, McFadden HG. Multiple behavior changes in diet and activity: a randomized controlled trial using mobile technology. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(10):789-796. doi:10.1001/archinter nmed.2012.1044
15. Turner-McGrievy GM, Beets MW, Moore JB. Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(3):513-518. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510
16. Fu S, Josue F. Overview of mobile fitness applications on physical and mental health of Chinese obese college students. Malays J Soc Sci Humanit. 2024;9(12):e002936. doi:10.47405/mjss h.v9i12.2936
17. McKay FH, Wright A, Shill J, Stephens H, Uccellini M. Using health and well-being apps for behavior change: a systematic search and rating of apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(1):e11926. doi:10.2196/11926
18. Zuiderveen Borgesius FJ, Trilling D, Möller J, Bodó B, de Vreese CH, Helberger N. Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Rev. 2016;5(1). doi:10.14763/2016.1.401
19. Zhao S, Li S, Ramos J, Luo Z, Jiang Z, Dey AK, Pan G. User profiling from their use of smartphone applications: a survey. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2019;59:101052. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.101052
20. Büyüköztürk Ş, Kılıç Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2013.
21. Shoeb A. Global fitness app market analysis, 2021. ResearchGate; 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350089845_Global_Fitness_App_Market_Analysis_2021
22. Statista. Number of mobile app downloads worldwide from 2016 to 2019. Statista; 2020. Available from:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/271644/worldwide-free-and-paid-mobile-app-store-downloads/
23. Yağcı S. Dijital Türkiye tutmadı mı? Ekonomim; 2023. Available from:
https://www.ekonomim.com/hafta/dijital-fitness-turkiyede-tutmadi-mi-haberi-702062
24. Nyenhuis SM, Greiwe J, Zeiger JS, Nanda A, Cooke A. Exercise and fitness in the age of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(7):2152-2155. doi:10.1 016/j.jaip.2020.04.039
25. Pavel P, Lukas J, Jan Z. Mobile apps that support physical activities and potential of these applications in physical education at school. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2016;11(1):176-194. doi:10.14198/jhse.2016.111.16
26. Holzer A, Ondrus J. Mobile application market: a developer’s perspective. Telemat Inform. 2011; 28(1):22-31. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2010.09.005
27. Xie Z, Nacioglu A, Or C. Prevalence, demographic correlates, and perceived impacts of mobile health app use amongst Chinese adults: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4): e103. doi:10.2196/mhealth.9002
28. Uslu B, Gür Ş, Eren T, Özcan E. Mobil uygulama seçiminde etkili olan kriterlerin belirlenmesi ve örnek uygulama. İstanbul İktisat Derg. 2020;70(1):113-139.
29. Kogler AM, Schöttl SE. Sports-related leisure behavior in Alpine regions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Austria, Germany and Italy. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1136191. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1136191
30. De Reuver M, Nikou S, Bouwman H. Domestication of smartphones and mobile applications: a quantitative mixed-method study. Mob Media Commun. 2016; 4(3):347-370. doi:10.1177/2050157916649989
31. [Empty reference]
32. Blair I. Mobile app download and usage statistics. BuildFire; 2019. Available from:
https://buildfire.com/app-statistics/
33. Statista. How often do you currently make use of sports and fitness apps? Statista; 2020. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/639567/sports-and-fitness-app-usage-frequency-in-us/
34. Meltwater. Global 2024 digital overview report. Meltwater; 2024. Available from:
https://www.meltwater.com/en/global-digital-trends
35. Maghnati F, Ling KC. Exploring the relationship between experiential value and usage attitude towards mobile apps among smartphone users. Int J Bus Manag. 2013;8(2):1-9. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v8n2p1
36. Ha JP, Kang SJ, Ha JA. Conceptual framework for the adoption of smartphones in a sports context. Int J Sports Mark Spons. 2015;16(2):2-19. doi:10.1108/IJSMS-16-02-2015-B002
37. Angosto S, García-Fernández J, Valantine I, Grimaldi-Puyana M. The intention to use fitness and physical activity apps: a systematic review. Sustainability. 2020;12(16):6641. doi:10.3390/su12 166641
38. Kim J, Shin DH. Factors affecting the adoption of mobile fitness applications. In: 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC); 2018 Oct 17-19; Jeju Island, Korea. IEEE; 2018:133-136. doi:10.110 9/ICTC.2018.8539573
39. Tucker I. Nike, Strava and Instagram: 10 of the best apps for runners. The Guardian. 2017 Aug 13. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/aug/13/10-best-apps-for-runners-fitness
40. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Liu Z, Song X. Run for the group: the impacts of offline teambuilding, social comparison and competitive climate on group physical activity—evidence from mobile fitness apps. Health Commun. 2020;36(10):1205-1214. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1754587
41. Liu C, Zhu Q, Holroyd AK, Seng KE. Status and trends of mobile-health applications for iOS devices: a developer’s perspective. J Syst Softw. 2011;84 (11):2022-2033. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.049
42. Jembai JVJ, Wong YLC, Bakhtiar NAMA, Lazim SNM, Ling HS, Kuan PX, Chua PF. Mobile health applications: awareness, attitudes, and practices among medical students in Malaysia. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):544. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03591-7
43. Shaid SZM, Maarof MA. In memory detection of Windows API call hooking technique. In: 2015 International Conference on Computer, Communications, and Control Technology (I4CT); 2015 Apr 21-23; Kuching, Malaysia. IEEE; 2015:294-298. doi:10.1109/I4CT.2015.7219580
44. World Health Organization (WHO). AB ve WHO dijital sağlık girişimi. WHO; 2023. Available from: https://www.healthworldnews.net/ab-ve-dso-dijital-saglik-girisimini-baslatti/
45. Tseng YT, Lin CC, Lee YC, Wu YJ. The effect of fitness app usage on exercise adherence and well-being: the role of self-concordance and goal adjustment. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e3 1457. doi:10.2196/31457
46. Suh A, Li M. How the use of mobile fitness technology influences older adults’ physical and psychological well-being. Comput Human Behav. 2022;131:107205. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107205
47. Papastergiou M, Natsis P, Vernadakis N, Antoniou P. Introducing tablets and a mobile fitness application into primary school physical education. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26:799-816. doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10272-z
48. Soulé B, Marchant G, Verchère R. Sport and fitness app uses: a review of humanities and social science perspectives. Eur J Sport Soc. 2022;19 (2):170-189. doi:10.1080/16138171.2022.2040362
49. Aboelmaged M, Ali I, Hashem G. Mobile apps use for wellness and fitness and university students’ subjective wellbeing. Inf Dev. 2022;38(4):672-687. doi:10.1177/02666669211030425
50. Wei J, Vinnikova A, Lu L, Xu J. Understanding and predicting the adoption of fitness mobile apps: evidence from China. Health Commun. 2021;36 (8):950-961. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1754587
51. Elsotouhy MM, Ghonim MA, Alasker TH, Khashan MA. Exploring users’ loyalty, WOM and continued intention toward health and fitness apps using the S-O-R model: the moderating role of health consciousness. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2024;40(5):1235-1250. doi:10.1080/10447318.202 3.2265411
52. Kim B, Lee E. What factors affect a user’s intention to use fitness applications? The moderating effect of health status: a cross-sectional study. Inquiry. 2022;59:00469580221095826. doi:10.1177/00469 580221095826
53. Kim HM. Social comparison of fitness social media postings by fitness app users. Comput Human Behav. 2022;131:107204. doi:10.1016/j.chb.202 2.107204
54. Liu Y, Avello M. Status of the research in fitness apps: a bibliometric analysis. Telemat Inform. 2021;57:101506. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101506
55. A’Naja MN, Reed R, Sansone J, Batrakoulis A, McAvoy C, Parrott MW. 2024 ACSM worldwide fitness trends: future directions of the health and fitness industry. ACSM Health Fit J. 2024;28(1):14-26. doi:10.1249/FIT.0000000000000894
56. Raman R, Kaul M, Meenakshi R, Jayaprakash S, Devi DR, Murugan S. IoT applications in sports and fitness: enhancing performance monitoring and training. In: 2023 Second International Conference on Smart Technologies for Smart Nation (SmartTechCon); 2023 Aug; Bangalore, India. IEEE; 2023:137-141. doi:10.1109/SmartTechCon55527.2023.10389297
57. Farrokhi A, Farahbakhsh R, Rezazadeh J, Minerva R. Application of internet of things and artificial intelligence for smart fitness: a survey. Comput Netw. 2021;189:107859. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107859
58. Tong HL, Quiroz JC, Kocaballi AB, Fat SCM, Dao KP, Gehringer H, Laranjo L. Personalized mobile technologies for lifestyle behavior change: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Prev Med. 2021;148:106532. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.202 1.106532
59. Grand View Research. Business process outsourcing (BPO) market share & trends analysis, 2023–2030. Grand View Research; 2022. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/business-process-outsourcing-bpo-market
60. Abuaddous HY, Saleh AM, Enaizan O, Ghabban F, Al-Badareen AB. Automated user experience (UX) testing for mobile application: strengths and limitations. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2022;16(4): 4-16. doi:10.3991/ijim.v16i04.27309