↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background: “Classical” mycobacterial identification is difficult to perform, time consuming, inefficient and often insensitive. Modern techniques, incorporating molecular methods, may be more rapid, less expensive, more sensitive and more accurate. We prospectively compared “classical” and modern mycobacterial detection techniques.

Methods: A plaque/qPCR study has been published on the blood of a herd of Johne disease (cattle infected with M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP.)) Simultaneously aliquots were submitted for “classical” mycobacterial identification. Plaque/qPCR could be completed in <3days. “Classical” cultures were followed for a minimum of 2 years.

Results: Plaque/qPCR MAP positivity were observed in 74% of Johne and 34% of Control animals. “Classical” detection on appropriate culture medium were seen in 19% in Johne disease and 18% Controls.

Conclusions: “Classical” mycobacterial detections methodology has demonstrably been supplanted by modern molecular methods.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 13 No 10 (2025): Vol.13, Issue 10, October 2025
SectionResearch Articles
Published24 October 2025
DOI10.18103/mra.v13i10.6979
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

RG

Robert J. Greenstein

Department of Surgery James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center Bronx NY USA. ; Laboratory of Molecular Surgical Research James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center Bronx NY USA.

SB

Sheldon T. Brown

ACOS Research. James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center Bronx NY USA.

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗