Wheat2School: a mixed-methods evaluation of a school-based whole grain program and its effects on knowledge, attitudes, and cafeteria acceptance among Hispanic/Latino fifth graders

Main Article Content

Claudia E. Carter, M.S. Julie Garden-Robinson, Ph.D.

Abstract

Whole grain intake among children from the U.S. remains well below recommendations, with Hispanic/Latino youth consuming particularly few whole grains despite their cultural importance. School-based, culturally tailored, experiential programs may help close this gap.


Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of Wheat2School® on students’ agricultural, food processing, and nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and observable behaviors toward whole grains among Hispanic/Latino elementary students, and to explore adult perspectives on cultural adaptation, engagement, and program sustainability.


Design, Setting, and Participants: A mixed-methods evaluation (2022–2025) was conducted in three California (U.S.) public school districts with 123 fifth-grade students (71% Hispanic/Latino) and five adult implementors. Students completed pre- and post-intervention surveys; 32 completed a 12-month follow-up. Qualitative data included adult interviews and cafeteria-based taste testing.


Intervention: The 9-month Wheat2School® program engaged students in planting, harvesting, milling, and preparing whole grain foods that were both culturally relevant, such as tortillas, and familiar, child-appealing options like pizza. These activities were supported by 14 lessons—taught in English or Spanish depending on the classroom—guided by Social Cognitive and Experiential Learning theories.


Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were changes in agricultural, food processing, and nutrition knowledge, and attitudes toward whole grain foods. Secondary outcomes included demographic predictors, retention at 12-month follow-up, observational cafeteria taste test ratings, and qualitative themes related to student emotions, behaviors, and sustainability.


Results: Students showed significant gains in agricultural knowledge (+2.8 points), food processing (+1.4), and nutrition (+0.6) (all p < .001). Based on Cohen’s d benchmarks, the agricultural knowledge gain reflected a large effect size, while the food processing and nutrition knowledge gains reflected medium effect sizes. Agriculture and nutrition knowledge were sustained at 12 months, while food processing partially declined. Attitudes improved at post-test (44% to 57%, p = .021) but not at follow-up. In qualitative assessments, adults described students’ joy, pride, and cultural familiarity (e.g., tortillas) as drivers of acceptance, with cafeteria taste testing confirming feasibility. Some families adopted whole wheat flour at home. Sustainability was supported by leadership but challenged by reliance on individual champions.


Conclusions and Relevance: Wheat2School® demonstrated that culturally adapted, experiential interventions can significantly improve whole grain knowledge, foster short-term attitude change, and extend influence on families. Embedding culturally familiar foods, bilingual delivery, and food service integration strengthens dietary equity and supports long-term health.

Keywords: whole grains; nutrition education; Hispanic/Latino youth; school-based intervention; experiential learning; cultural adaptation; garden-based learning; food service integration

Article Details

How to Cite
CARTER, Claudia E.; GARDEN-ROBINSON, Julie. Wheat2School: a mixed-methods evaluation of a school-based whole grain program and its effects on knowledge, attitudes, and cafeteria acceptance among Hispanic/Latino fifth graders. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 10, oct. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6996>. Date accessed: 15 nov. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i10.6996.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Albertson AM, Reicks M, Joshi N, Gugger CK. Whole grain consumption trends and associations with body weight measures in the United States: results from the cross sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2012. Nutr J. 2015;15(1):8. doi:10.1186/s12937-016-0126-4

2. Reicks M, Jonnalagadda S, Albertson AM, Joshi N. Total dietary fiber intakes in the US population are related to whole grain consumption: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2010. Nutrition Research. 2014;34(3):226-234. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2014.01.002

3. USDA. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.; 2020.
https://odphp.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/.

4. Lin BH, Yen ST. The U.S. Grain Consumption Landscape: Who Eats Grain, in What Form, Where, and How Much?; 2007. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.55967

5. Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre. EFSA Journal. 2010;8(3). doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1462

6. Carbohydrate Intake for Adults and Children : WHO Guideline. World Health Organization; 2023.

7. Meynier A, Chanson-Rollé A, Riou E. Main Factors Influencing Whole Grain Consumption in Children and Adults—A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12(8). doi:10.3390/nu12082217

8. CDC. SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth.
https://www.searchfordiabetes.org/dspHome.cfm.

9. Skinner AC, Ravanbakht SN, Skelton JA, Perrin EM, Armstrong SC. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity in US Children, 1999–2016. Pediatrics. 2018;141(3). doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3459

10. Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Martin CB, et al. Trends in Obesity Prevalence by Race and Hispanic Origin—1999-2000 to 2017-2018. JAMA. 2020;324(12):1208. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.14590

11. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, et al. Incidence Trends of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes among Youths, 2002–2012. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376(15):1419-1429. doi:10.105 6/NEJMoa1610187

12. Mattei J, Sotres-Alvarez D, Daviglus ML, et al. Diet Quality and Its Association with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Vary by Hispanic and Latino Ethnic Background in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. J Nutr. 2016;146(10):2035-2044. doi:10.3945/jn.116.231209

13. Siega-Riz AM, Sotres-Alvarez D, Ayala GX, et al. Food-group and nutrient-density intakes by Hispanic and Latino backgrounds in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014; 99(6):1487-1498. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.082685

14. English LK, Raghavan R, Obbagy JE, et al. Dietary Patterns and Health: Insights From NESR Systematic Reviews to Inform the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024;56(1):75-87. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2023.10.001

15. Scientific Report of the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of Agriculture.; 2024. doi:10.52570/DGAC2025

16. Mattei J, Caballero-González A, Maafs-Rodríguez A, Zhang A, O’Neill HJ, Gago C. Lessons learned by adapting and implementing LUCHA: a deep-structure culturally tailored healthy eating randomized pilot intervention for ethnic-diverse Latinos. Front Public Health. 2024;11. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269390

17. Bellows LL, Conlon T, Cunningham-Sabo L,, Johnson SL. Opportunities in the Classroom or Cafeteria for a “Tasting Challenge” to Influence First Grade Students’ Willingness to Try New Foods. Journal of Child Nutrition & Management. 2015;39 (2). Accessed January 8, 2025.
https://schoolnutrition.org/journal/fall-2015-opportunities-in-the-classroom-or-cafeteria-for-a-tasting-challenge-to-influence-first-grade-students-willingness-to-try-new-foods/

18. Leake L, McClam M, Howell A, Schreiber K. Impacts of farm to school on children’s perception of food. Food, Nutrition and Health. 2025;2(1):10. doi:10.1007/s44403-025-00020-5

19. Kamar M, Evans C, Hugh-Jones S. Factors influencing adolescent whole grain intake: A theory-based qualitative study. Appetite. 2016;101:125-133. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.154

20. Gatto NM, Martinez LC, Spruijt‐Metz D, Davis JN. LA sprouts randomized controlled nutrition, cooking and gardening programme reduces obesity and metabolic risk in Hispanic/Latino youth. Pediatr Obes. 2017;12(1):28-37. doi:10.1111/ijpo.12102

21. McCurley JL, Gutierrez AP, Gallo LC. Diabetes Prevention in U.S. Hispanic Adults: A Systematic Review of Culturally Tailored Interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(4):519-529. doi:10.1016/j.ame pre.2016.10.028

22. Kaiser LL, Sutherlin JM, Yoshida SC, Murphy SP, Bresnick SD. Latinos improve food habits through nutrition education. Calif Agric (Berkeley). 1998;52 (4):32-35. doi:10.3733/ca.v052n04p32

23. Kaiser LL, Aguilera AL, Horowitz M, et al. Correlates of food patterns in young Latino children at high risk of obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18 (16):3042-3050. doi:10.1017/S1368980014003309

24. Castro FG, Barrera M, Holleran Steiker LK. Issues and Challenges in the Design of Culturally Adapted Evidence-Based Interventions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6(1):213-239. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-033109-132032

25. Perez LM, Biruete A. Lack of Cultural and Language Concordant Nutrition Education for Hispanic/Latinx Individuals with CKD: A Call to Action. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(7):1262-1264. doi:10.1681/ASN.2022040430

26. Resnicow K, Baranowski T, Ahluwalia JS, Braithwaite RL. Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis. 1999;9(1):10-21.

27. Savoie-Roskos MR, Wengreen H, Durward C. Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Children and Youth through Gardening-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(2):240-250. doi:10.1016/j.jand.20 16.10.014

28. Langellotto GA, Gupta A. Gardening Increases Vegetable Consumption in School-aged Children: A Meta-analytical Synthesis. Horttechnology. 2012; 22(4):430-445. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.22.4.430

29. Davis JN, Ventura EE, Cook LT, Gyllenhammer LE, Gatto NM. LA Sprouts: A Gardening, Nutrition, and Cooking Intervention for Latino Youth Improves Diet and Reduces Obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111(8). doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.05.009

30. Parmer SM, Salisbury-Glennon J, Shannon D, Struempler B. School Gardens: An Experiential Learning Approach for a Nutrition Education Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Knowledge, Preference, and Consumption among Second-grade Students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41(3):212-217. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.002

31. Lakkakula A, Geaghan J, Zanovec M, Pierce S, Tuuri G. Repeated taste exposure increases liking for vegetables by low-income elementary school children. Appetite. 2010;55(2):226-231. doi:10.101 6/j.appet.2010.06.003

32. Burgess-Champoux T, Marquart L, Vickers Z, Reicks M. Perceptions of Children, Parents, and Teachers Regarding Whole-Grain Foods, and Implications for a School-Based Intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006;38(4):230-237. doi:10.1016/j.jne b.2006.04.147

33. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. In: 1986.
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142519016

34. Kolb D. Experiential Learning. Prentice Hall; 1984.

35. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge university press; 1999.

36. Mezirow J. Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult and continuing education. 1997;1997(74):5-12.

37. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard university press; 1979.

38. Ratcliffe MM, Merrigan KA, Rogers BL, Goldberg JP. The Effects of School Garden Experiences on Middle School-Aged Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Associated With Vegetable Consumption. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(1):36-43. doi:10.1177/1524839909349182

39. Koo HC, Poh B, Talib R. Development, validity and reliability of a questionnaire on knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards whole grain among primary school children in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Int Food Res J. 2016;23:797-805.

40. Longhurst ML, Judd-Murray R, Spielmaker DM. Longhurst Murray Agricultural Literacy Instrument.; 2019. Accessed April 14, 2025. https://agliteracy.org/research/assessment/

41. Longhurst ML, Judd-Murray R, Coster DC, Spielmaker DM. Measuring Agricultural Literacy: Grade 3-5 Instrument Development and Validation. J Agric Educ. 2020;61(2). doi:10.5032/jae.2020.02173

42. SAS Institute Inc. JMP® Student Edition (Version 18.2.0). SAS Institute Inc. Preprint posted online 2024. Accessed July 19, 2025. https://www.jmp.com

43. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

44. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589-597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1 628806

45. Xiao Z, Yuan X, Liao QV, Abdelghani R, Oudeyer PY. Supporting Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Combining Codebook with GPT-3 for Deductive Coding. In: 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM; 2023:75-78. doi:10.1145/3581754.3584136

46. Yan L, Echeverria V, Fernandez-Nieto GM, et al. Human-AI Collaboration in Thematic Analysis using ChatGPT: A User Study and Design Recommendations. In: Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2024: 1-7. doi:10.1145/3613905.3650732

47. Arlinghaus CS, Wulff C, Maier GW. Inductive Coding with ChatGPT - An Evaluation of Different GPT Models Clustering Qualitative Data into Categories. Preprint posted online June 27, 2024. doi:10.31219/osf.io/gpnye

48. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189-1208.

49. Zhang H, Wu C, Xie J, Lyu Y, Cai J, Carroll JM. Harnessing the power of AI in qualitative research: Exploring, using and redesigning ChatGPT. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. 2025;4: 100144. doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100144

50. Creswell JW., Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE; 2018.

51. Kokkorou M, Spinelli S, Dinnella C, Monteleone E. Interventions based on sensory‐hedonic strategies and on nudging to facilitate vegetable and pulses consumption in the school environment. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2024;23(2). doi:10.1111/15 41-4337.13312

52. Hutchinson J, Christian MS, Evans CEL, Nykjaer C, Hancock N, Cade JE. Evaluation of the impact of school gardening interventions on children’s knowledge of and attitudes towards fruit and vegetables. A cluster randomised controlled trial. Appetite. 2015;91:405-414. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2 015.04.076

53. Svisco E, Byker Shanks C, Ahmed S, Bark K. Variation of Adolescent Snack Food Choices and Preferences along a Continuum of Processing Levels: The Case of Apples. Foods. 2019;8(2):50. doi:10.3390/foods8020050

54. Medina X, Giampaoli J, Goto K, Hart S, Bianco S. Impact of a farm stand on fruit and vegetable preferences, self-efficacy, and availability at home among students from a low-income school. The Journal of Child Nutrition & Management. 2017;41 (1):2012.

55. Lautenschlager L, Smith C. Beliefs, knowledge, and values held by inner-city youth about gardening, nutrition, and cooking. Agric Human Values. 2007; 24(2):245-258. doi:10.1007/s10460-006-9051-z

56. Adams MA, Todd M, McEntee ML, et al. A cluster randomized factorial trial of school-lunch salad bars and marketing on elementary students’ objectively measured fruit and vegetable consumption. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2025;22(1):58. doi:10.1186/s12966-025-01758-z

57. Mitchell M, Goldsworthy N, Roth A, Gonzalez-Avram C. Unique In-school Garden and Nutrition Intervention Improves Vegetable Preference and Food Literacy in Two Independently Conducted Evaluations (P16-040-19). Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3: nzz050.P16-040-19. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz050.P16-040-19

58. Jeans MR, Landry MJ, Vandyousefi S, et al. Effects of a School-Based Gardening, Cooking, and Nutrition Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial on Unprocessed and Ultra-Processed Food Consumption. J Nutr. 2023;153(7):2073-2084. doi:10.1016/j.tjnu t.2023.04.013

59. Somerset S, Markwell K. Impact of a school-based food garden on attitudes and identification skills regarding vegetables and fruit: a 12-month intervention trial. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(2): 214-221. doi:10.1017/S1368980008003327

60. Robinson-O’Brien R, Story M, Heim S. Impact of Garden-Based Youth Nutrition Intervention Programs: A Review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2):273-280. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.051

61. Hahnraths MTH, Jansen JPM, Winkens B, van Schayck OCP. The Effects of a Multi-Component School-Based Nutrition Education Intervention on Children’s Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Intake. Nutrients. 2022;14(20):4259. doi:10.3390/n u14204259

62. Husén Torsten, Postlethwaite TNeville. The International Encyclopedia of Education. Pergamon ; Elsevier Science; 1994.

63. Bronfenbrenner Urie. Ecology of Human Development : Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press; 2009.

64. Ayala GX, Elder JP, Campbell NR, et al. Nutrition Communication for a Latino Community. Fam Community Health. 2001;24(3):72-87. doi:10.1097/0 0003727-200110000-00009

65. Ayala GX, Mueller K, Lopez-Madurga E, Campbell NR, Elder JP. Restaurant and food shopping selections among Latino women in Southern California. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105 (1):38-45. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2004.10.023

66. Lindsay AC, Sussner KM, Greaney ML, Peterson KE. Latina Mothers’ Beliefs and Practices Related to Weight Status, Feeding, and the Development of Child Overweight. Public Health Nurs. 2011; 28(2):107-118. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00906.x

67. Livingstone KM, Love P, Mathers JC, Kirkpatrick SI, Olstad DL. Cultural adaptations and tailoring of public health nutrition interventions in Indigenous peoples and ethnic minority groups: opportunities for personalised and precision nutrition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2023;82(4):478-486. doi:10.1017/S002966512300304X

68. Rossi MM. Assessment of a Pilot Nutrition Education Program for Hispanic Youth and Their Parents. Clemson University; 2008. https://open.clemson.edu/all_theses/435

69. Koh LM. Culturally Tailoring Plant-Based Nutrition Interventions for Hispanic/Latino Adults at Risk for or With Type 2 Diabetes: An Integrative Review. Hisp Health Care Int. 2023;21(2):89-103. doi:10.1177/15404153221085696

70. Broyles SL, Brennan JJ, Herzog Burke K, Kozo J, Taras HL. Cultural Adaptation of a Nutrition Education Curriculum for Latino Families to Promote Acceptance. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43 (4):S158-S161. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2011.02.014

71. Sabogal F, Marín G, Otero-Sabogal R, Marín BV, Perez-Stable EJ. Hispanic Familism and Acculturation: What Changes and What Doesn’t? Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987;9(4):397-412. doi:10.1177/07399863870 094003

72. Weisskirch RS, Alva SA. Language Brokering and the Acculturation of Latino Children. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2002;24(3):369-378. doi:10.1177/07399 86302024003007

73. Arévalo Avalos MR, Ayers SL, Patrick DL, et al. Familism, Self-Esteem, and Weight-Specific Quality of Life Among Latinx Adolescents With Obesity. J Pediatr Psychol. 2020;45(8):848-857. doi:10.1093/j pepsy/jsaa047

74. Robles-Ramamurthy B, Sandoval JF, Tobón AL, Fortuna LR. Beyond Children’s Mental Health: Cultural Considerations to Foster Latino Child and Family Mental Health. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2022;31(4):765-778. doi:10.1016/j.chc.202 2.05.005

75. Laviolette C, Johnson CM, Butler JL, Biediger-Friedman L, Sharkey JR. Nutrition Effects of a Family-Centered Health Promotion Program for Mexican-Heritage Children in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Nutrients. 2023;15(7):1600. doi:10.3390/n u15071600

76. Innes JE, Booher DE. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Routledge; 2010.

77. Ozer EJ. The Effects of School Gardens on Students and Schools: Conceptualization and Considerations for Maximizing Healthy Development. Health Education & Behavior. 2007;34(6):846-863. doi:10.1177/1090198106289002

78. Schunk DH, DiBenedetto MK. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020; 60:101832. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

79. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2005;4(2):193-212. doi:10.5465/amle.2 005.17268566

80. Wells NM, Todd LE, Henderson CR, et al. The effects of school gardens on fruit and vegetable consumption at school: A randomized controlled trial with low-income elementary schools in four U.S. states. Prev Med Rep. 2023;31:102053. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102053

81. Parmer SM, Salisbury-Glennon J, Shannon D, Struempler B. School Gardens: An Experiential Learning Approach for a Nutrition Education Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Knowledge, Preference, and Consumption among Second-grade Students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41(3): 212-217. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.002

82. Davis C, Bryan J, Hodgson J, Murphy K. Definition of the Mediterranean Diet; A Literature Review. Nutrients. 2015;7(11):9139-9153. doi:10.339 0/nu7115459

83. Saha S, Dawson J, Murimi M, Dodd S, Oldewage-Theron W. Effects of a nutrition education intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption-related dietary behavioural factors among elementary school children. Health Educ J. 2020;79(8):963-973. doi:10.1177/0017896920944421

84. Ostovarfar J, Zare S, Kaveh MH, Ostovarfar M, Eftekharian F, Vali M. The Effectiveness of Nutritional Interventions Based on Health Education and Promotion Theories and Models: A Systematic Review. Journal of Nutrition and Food Security. Published online July 30, 2021. doi:10.18502/jnfs.v 6i3.6834

Most read articles by the same author(s)