Behavioral and Connectional Neuroplasticity in M1 Lesion Adult Macaque Monkeys
Main Article Content
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that permanent lesions of the hand area of primary motor cortex (M1) in adult macaque monkeys induced a temporary loss of manual dexterity, followed by incomplete, spontaneous functional recovery. Notably, a treatment with anti-Nogo-A antibody or autologous cellular therapy both enhanced the recovery compared to untreated monkeys. An indicator of this improvement in functional recovery is the increased number of small food pellets retrieved from vertical and horizontal slots in a reach-and-grasp task (“modified Brinkman Board” task) which requires the opposition of the thumb and index finger (precision grip) under visual guidance. The horizontal slots proved more challenging than the vertical ones and offered a better discrimination between treated and untreated monkeys.
We hypothesized that further increasing the difficulty of the behavioral readout would better discriminate between the 2 subgroups. Therefore, we developed a novel manual dexterity task performed without visual guidance (“Brinkman Box task without vision”). In this task, the tested hand was inserted into a “blind” box to grasp pellets from hidden slots, relying on motor exploration based on palpation, and executing precision grip without visual guidance. This more challenging blind task required intensive and long training, and additional positive reinforcement. Nevertheless, a successful and stable performance level was achieved in 10 pilot adult macaques which were subsequently subjected to a unilateral permanent lesion of M1. Of these, four monkeys were left untreated (“control”), whereas 4 received the anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment and 2 were treated with cellular therapy.
Immediately post-lesion, the ability to retrieving pellets with the contralesional hand dropped to zero in all monkeys, followed after a few weeks by partial functional recovery, ultimately reaching a plateau of restored manual dexterity. The “treated” monkeys outperformed the control group, corroborating previous behavioral findings from visually guided tests. The greatest discrimination between the 2 subgroups was obtained by combining the results derived from both visually guided and blind tasks. Potential mechanisms underlying functional recovery are discussed in the context of functional and connectional neuroplasticity with emphasis on the involvement of the adjacent intact premotor cortex, in particular with adaptation of its efferent and afferent projections.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2 Dum RP, Strick PL. Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6513-6525.
3 Dum R, Strick P. Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate. Physiology & Behavior 2002;77:677–682.
4 Luppino G, Rizzolatti G. The Organization of the Frontal Motor Cortex. News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society 2000;15:219-224.
5 Rathelot JA, Strick PL. Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: An anatomical perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8257-8262.
6 Rathelot JA, Strick PL. Subdivisions of primary motor cortex based on cortico-motoneuronal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:918-923.
7 Raos V, Umilta´ MA, Murata A, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Functional Properties of Grasping-Related Neurons in the Ventral Premotor Area F5 of the Macaque Monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:709-729.
8 Lemon RN. Descending pathways in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:195–218.
9 Lemon R. Recent advances in our understanding of the primate corticospinal system. F1000Research. 2019;8:274 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17445.1).
10 Nelissen K, Vanduffel W. Grasping-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Responses in the Macaque Monkey. J Neurosci. 2011;31:8220-8229.
11 Rathelot JA, Dum RP, Strick PL. Posterior parietal cortex contains a command apparatus for hand movements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:4255-4260.
12 Gardner EP, Putrino DF, Chen (Van Daele) J. Neural representation in M1 and S1 cortex of bilateral hand actions during prehension. J Neurophysiol. 2022;127:1007-1025.
13 Bufacchi RJ, Battaglia-Mayer A, Iannetti GD, Caminiti R. Cortico-spinal modularity in the parieto-frontal system: A new perspective on action control. Prog Neurobiol. 2023;231:102537.
14 Jenny AB, Inukai J. Principles of motor organization of the monkey cervical spinal cord. J Neurosci. 1983;3:567–575.
15 He S-Q, Dum RP, Strick PL. Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: Motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 1993;13:952-980.
16 He SQ, Dum RP, Strick PL. Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: motor areas on the medial surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3284-3306.
17 Rouiller EM, Moret V, Tanné J, Boussaoud D. Evidence for direct connections between the hand region of the supplementary motor area and cervical motoneurons in the macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:1055-1059.
18 Borra E, Belmalih A, Gerbella M, et al. Projections of the hand field of the macaque ventral premotor area F5 to the brainstem and spinal cord. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:2570-2591.
19 Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, McNeal DW, Pizzimenti MA, Darling WG. Terminal Distribution of the Corticospinal Projection from the Hand/Arm Region of the Primary Motor Cortex to the Cervical Enlargement in Rhesus Monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2013;521:4205-4235.
20 Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Rotella DL, Pizzimenti MA, Darling WG. Terminal organization of the corticospinal projection from the lateral premotor cortex to the cervical enlargement (C5 – T1) in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2019;527:2761-2789.
21 Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Lemon RN, Ganguly K, Darling WG. Terminal Organization of the Corticospinal Projection from the Arm/hand Region of the Rostral Primary Motor Cortex (M1r or Old M1) to the Cervical Enlargement (C5-T1) in Rhesus Monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2023; 531:1996-2018.
22 Lawrence DG, Kuypers HGJM. The functional organization of the motor system. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain. 1968;91:1-14.
23 Lawrence DG, Hopkins DA. The development of motor control in the rhesus monkey: evidence concerning the role of corticomotoneuronal connections. Brain 1976;99:235–254.
24 Courtine G, Bunge MB, Fawcett JW, et al. Can experiments in nonhuman primates expedite the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans? Nat Med. 2007;13:561-566.
25 Kinoshita M, Matsui R, Kato S, et al. Genetic dissection of the circuit for hand dexterity in primates. Nature. 2012;487:235-238.
26 Yoshida Y, Isa T. Neural and genetic basis of dexterous hand movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;52:25-32.
27 Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H. Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. Neuroreport 1994;5:1525-1529.
28 Rouiller EM, Yu X.Y., Tempini A. (1997) Effect of inactivation of M1 and SMA on precision grip performance in monkeys. In: Perspectives of motor Behavior and its Neural Basis. Eds M.C. Hepp-Reymond and G. Marini, Karger (Basel). 1997.pp. 34-43.
29 Kermadi I, Liu Y, Tempini A, Rouiller EM. Effects of reversible inactivation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) on unimanual grasp and bimanual pull and grasp performance in monkeys. Somatosens Mot Res. 1997;14:268-280.
30 Wiesendanger M, Kazennikov O, Perrig S, Rouiller EM, Kermadi I. Reaching, grasping, and bimanual coordination with special reference to the posterior parietal cortex. In: Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space. Eds P. Thier and H.O. Karnath, Springer Verlag (Berlin). 1997. pp. 271-288.
31 Brochier T, Boudreau MJ, Paré M, Smith AM. The effects of muscimol inactivation of small regions of motor and somatosensory cortex on independent finger movements and force control in the precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128:31-40.
32 Fogassi L, Gallese V, Buccino G, Craighero L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanism for the visual guidance of hand grasping movements in the monkey: A reversible inactivation study. Brain. 2001;124:571-586.
33 Rouiller EM, Olivier E. Functional recovery after lesions of the primary motor cortex. Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:467-475.
34 Roux, Kaeser M, Savidan J, Fregosi M, Rouiller EM, Schmidlin E. (2019) Assessment of the effect of continuous theta burst stimulation of the motor cortex on manual dexterity in non-human primates in a direct comparison with invasive intracortical pharmacological inactivation. Europ J Neurosci. 2019; doi: 10.1111/ejn.14517, p. 1-15.
35 Maier MA, Armand J, Kirkwood PA, Yang HW, Davis JN, Lemon RN. Differences in the corticospinal projection from primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area to macaque upper limb motoneurons: An anatomical and electrophysiological study. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:281-296.
36 Schmidlin E, Brochier T, Maier MA, Kirkwood PA, Lemon RN. Pronounced reduction of digit motor responses evoked from macaque ventral premotor cortex after reversible inactivation of the primary motor cortex hand area. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5772-5783.
37 Boudrias MH, McPherson RL, Frost SB, Cheney PD. Output Properties and Organization of the Forelimb Representation of Motor Areas on the Lateral Aspect of the Hemisphere in Rhesus Macaques. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:169-86.
38 Boudrias MH, Lee SP, Svojanovsky S, Cheney PD. Forelimb muscle representations and output properties of motor areas in the mesial wall of rhesus macaques. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:704-719.
39 Klüver H. An auto-multi-stimulation reaction board for use with sub-human primates. J Psychol. 1935;1:123-127.
40 Cole J. Three tests for the study of motor and sensory abilities in monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1952;45:226.
41 Cole J, Glees P. Effects of small lesions in sensory cortex in trained monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1954;17:1-13.
42 Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Prejean T, Gedela R. Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1992;12:2918-2947.
43 Nudo R., Plautz EJ, Milliken GW. Adaptive Plasticity in Primate Motor Cortex as a consequence of Behavioral Experience and Neuronal Injury. Seminars in Neuroscience. 1997; 9:13-23.
44 Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: a feasibility study in primates. Neurol Res. 2003;25:801-810.
45 Pizzimenti MA, Darling WG, Rotella DL, et al. Measurement of reaching kinematics and prehensile dexterity in nonhuman primates. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:1015-1029.
46 Eisner-Janowicz I, Barbay S, Hoover E, et al. Early and late changes in the distal forelimb representation of the supplementary motor area after injury to frontal motor areas in the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1498-1512.
47 Murata Y, Higo N, Oishi T, et al. Effects of Motor Training on the Recovery of Manual Dexterity After Primary Motor Cortex Lesion in Macaque Monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 2008;99:773-786.
48 Brinkman J, Kuypers HG. Splitbrain Monkeys: Cerebral Control of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Arm, Hand, and Finger Movements. Science. 1972;176:536-539.
49 Brinkman J, Kuypers HG. Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. Brain. 1973;96:653-674.
50 Brinkman C. Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section. J Neurosci. 1984;4:918-929.
51 LeFriec A, Desmoulin F, Demain B, et al. A reproducible new model of focal ischemic injury in marmoset monkey: MRI and behavioral follow-up. Transl Stroke Res. 2021;12:98-111.
52 Badi M, Wurth S, Scarpato I, et al. Intrafascicular peripheral nerve stimulation produces fine functional hand movements in primates. Science Translat Medicine. 2021;13:1-15.
53 Bottenfield KR, Bowley BGE, Pessina MA, Medalla M, Rosene DL, Moore TL. Sex differences in recovery of motor function in a rhesus monkey model of cortical injury. Biol Sex Differ. 2021;12:54:1-15.
54 Barra B, Conti S, Perich M, et al. Epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical dorsal roots restores voluntary arm control in paralyzed monkeys. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:924-934.
55 Rouiller EM, Yu XY, Moret V, Tempini A, Wiesendanger M, Liang F. Dexterity in adult monkeys following early lesion of the motor cortical hand area: the role of the cortex adjacent to the lesion. Europ. J. Neurosci. 1998;10:729-740.
56 Liu Y, Rouiller EM. Mechanisms of recovery of dexterity following unilateral lesion of the sensorimotor cortex in adult monkeys. Exp Brain Res 1999;128:149-159.
57 Schmidlin E, Wannier T, Bloch J, Belhaj-Saif A, Wyss A, Rouiller E.M. Reduction of the hand representation in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex following unilateral section of the corticospinal tract at cervical level in monkeys. BMC Neurosci. 2005;6:56.
58 Schmidlin E, Kaeser M, Gindrat AD, et al. Behavioral assessment of manual dexterity in non-human primates. J Vis Exp. 2011;57:3258.
59 Freund P, Schmidlin E, Wannier T, et al. Nogo-A-specific antibody treatment enhances sprouting and functional recovery after cervical lesion in adult primates. Nature Med 2006;12:790-792.
60 Freund P, Schmidlin E, Wannier T, et al. Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment promotes recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral cervical lesion in adult primates--re-examination and extension of behavioral data. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29:983-996.
61 Kaeser M, Wyss AF, Bashir S, et al. Effects of Unilateral Motor Cortex Lesion on Ipsilesional Hand's Reach and Grasp Performance in Monkeys: Relationship with Recovery in the Contralesional Hand. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:1630-1645.
62 Kaeser M, Brunet JF, Wyss A, et al. Autologous adult cortical cell transplantation enhances functional recovery following unilateral lesion of motor cortex in primates: a pilot study. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:1405-1417.
63 Kaeser M, Wannier T, Brunet JF, Wyss A, Bloch J, Rouiller EM. Representation of motor habit in a sequence of repetitive reach and grasp movements performed by macaque monkeys: Evidence for a contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cortex. 2013;49:1404-1419.
64 Kaeser M., Chatagny P., Gindrat A.D., et al. Variability of manual dexterity performance in non-human primates (Macaca fascicularis). International Journal of Comparative Psychology 2014;27:295-325.
65 Bashir S, Kaeser M, Wyss AF, et al. Short-term effects of unilateral lesion of the primary motor cortex (M1) on ipsilesional hand dexterity in adult macaque monkeys. Brain Struct Function. 2011;217: 63-79.
66 Chatagny P, Badoud S, Kaeser M, et al. Distinction between hand dominance and hand preference in primates: a behavioral investigation of manual dexterity in nonhuman primates (macaques) and human subjects. Brain Behav. 2013;3:575-595.
67 Hoogewoud F, Hamadjida A, Wyss AF, et al. Comparison of functional recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral spinal cord lesion or motor cortex lesion in adult macaque monkeys. Front Neurol. 2013;4:101.
68 Wyss AF, Hamadjida A, Savidan J, et al. Long-term motor cortical map changes following unilateral lesion of the hand representation in the motor cortex in macaque monkeys showing functional recovery of hand functions. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31:733-760.
69 Savidan J, Kaeser M, Belhaj-Saif A, Schmidlin E, Rouiller EM. Role of primary motor cortex in the control of manual dexterity assessed via sequential bilateral lesion in the adult macaque monkey: A case study. Neurosci. 2017;357:303-324.
70 Badoud S, Borgognon S, Cottet J, et al. Effects of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lesion on motor habit and performance assessed with manual grasping and control of force in macaque monkeys. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222:1193-1206.
71 Contestabile A, Colangiulo R, Lucchini M, et al. Asymmetric and Distant Effects of a Unilateral Lesion of the Primary Motor Cortex on the Bilateral Supplementary Motor Areas in Adult Macaque Monkeys. J Neurosci. 2018;38:10644-10656.
72 Contestabile A, Colangiulo R, Lucchini M, Rouiller EM, Schmidlin E. Variable Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Layer V of the Supplementary Motor Area following Cervical Hemisection in Adult Macaque Monkeys. eNeuro. 2020;7(5):1-15.
73 Beaud ML, Rouiller EM, Bloch J, Mir A, Schwab ME, Schmidlin E. Combined with anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment, BDNF did not compensate the extra deleterious motor effect caused by large size cervical cord hemi-section in adult macaques. CNS Neurosci & Therapeutics. 2019; doi: 10.1111/cns.13213, p. 1-10.
74 Borgognon S, Cottet J, Moret V, et al. Fine Manual Dexterity Assessment After Autologous Neural Cell Ecosystem (ANCE) Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model of Parkinson's Disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019;33:553-567.
75. Roux C, Savidan J, Brunet JF, et al. Confirmation of the enhancement effect of ANCE treatment on functional recovery of manual dexterity from primary motor cortex (M1) lesion in adult macaque monkeys. Brain and Behav. 2025. (in revision).
76 Napier JR. The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956;38-B:902-913.
77 Napier J. The evolution of the hand. Sci Amer. 1962;207:56-62.
78 Darian-Smith I. 1984. The Sense of Touch: Performance and Peripheral Neural Processes. In: Brookhart, J.M., Mountcastle, V.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Sensory Processes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1984. pp. 739-788.
79 Darian-Smith I, Galea MP, Darian-Smith C, Sugitani M, Tan A, Burman K. Introduction. The Anatomy of Manual Dexterity. Advances in Anatomy Embryology and Cell Biology. 1996;Volume 133. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1-16.
80 Borgognon S, Cottet J, Moret V, et al. Enhancement of Striatal Dopaminergic Function Following Autologous Neural Cell Ecosystems (ANCE) Transplantation in a Non-Human Primate Model of Parkinson's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism. 2017;7:383. Doi: 10.4172/2161-0460.1000383.
81 Hikosaka O, Tanaka M, Sakamoto M, Iwamura Y. Deficits in manipulative behaviors induced by local injections of muscimol in the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Brain Res. 1985;325:375-380.
82 Darian-Smith C. Monkey Models of Recovery of Voluntary Hand Movement After Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Injury. ILAR Journal 2007;48:96-410.
83 Kilintari M, Raos V, Savaki HE. 2011. Grasping in the Dark Activates Early Visual Cortices. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:949-963.
84 Sobinov AR, Bensmaia SJ. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22:741-757.
85 Brunet JF, Rouiller E, Wannier T, Villemure JG, Bloch J. Primate adult brain cell autotransplantation, a new tool for brain repair? Experimental Neurology 2005;196:195-198.
86 Brunet JF, Redmond DE, Jr., Bloch J (2009) Primate adult brain cell autotransplantation, a pilot study in asymptomatic MPTP treated monkeys. Cell Transpl. 18(7):787-799.
87 Bloch J, Brunet JF, McEntire CR, Redmond DE. Primate adult brain cell autotransplantation produces behavioral and biological recovery in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced parkinsonian St. Kitts monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:2729-2740.
88 Boussaoud D, Tanné-Gariépy J, Wannier T, Rouiller EM. Callosal connections of dorsal versus ventral premotor areas in the macaque monkey: a multiple retrograde tracing study. BMC Neurosci. 2005;6:67.
89 Hamadjida A, Wyss AF, Mir A, Schwab ME, Belhaj-Saif A, Rouiller EM. Influence of anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment on the reorganization of callosal connectivity of the premotor cortical areas following unilateral lesion of primary motor cortex (M1) in adult macaque monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 2012;223:321-340.
90 Fregosi M, Contestabile A, Hamadjida A, Rouiller EM. Corticobulbar projections from distinct motor cortical areas to the reticular formation in macaque monkeys. Europ J Neurosci. 2017;45:1379-1395.
91 Fregosi M, Rouiller EM. Ipsilateral corticotectal projections from the primary, premotor and supplementary motor cortical areas in adult macaque monkeys: a quantitative anterograde tracing study. Europ J Neurosci. 2017;46:2406-2415.
92 Fregosi M, Contestabile A, Badoud S, et al. Changes of motor corticobulbar projections following different lesion types affecting the central nervous system in adult macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;48:2050-2070.
93 Fregosi M, Contestabile A, Badoud S, et al. Corticotectal Projections From the Premotor or Primary Motor Cortex After Cortical Lesion or Parkinsonian Symptoms in Adult Macaque Monkeys: A Pilot Tracing Study. Front Neuroanat. 2019;13:50:1-11.
94 Lanz F, Moret V, Ambett R, Cappe C, Rouiller EM, Loquet G. Distant heterotopic callosal connections to premotor cortex in non-human primates. Neurosci. 2017;344:56-66.
95 Rouiller EM. Adaptation of the layer V supraspinal motor corticofugal projections from the primary (M1) and premotor (PM) cortices after CNS motor disorders in non-human primates: A survey. Transl Neurosci. 2024;15:20220342. https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0342.
96 Borgognon S, Cottet J, Badoud S, Bloch J, Brunet JF, Rouiller EM. Cortical Projection from the Premotor or Primary Motor Cortex to the Subthalamic Nucleus in Intact and Parkinsonian Adult Macaque Monkeys: A Pilot Tracing Study. Front Neural Circuits. 2020;14:1-10.
97 Borgognon S, Rouiller EM. Loss of motor cortical inputs to the red nucleus after CNS disorders in nonhuman primates. J Neurosci. 2023;43:1682-1891.
98 Rouiller EM, Tanné J, Moret V, Kermadi I, Boussaoud D, Welker E. Dual morphology and topography of the corticothalamic terminals originating from the primary, supplementary motor and dorsal premotor cortical areas in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998;396:169-185.
99 Rouiller EM, Wannier T, Morel A. The dual pattern of corticothalamic projection of the premotor cortex in macaque monkeys. Thalamus and Related Structures 2003;2 (3):189-197.
100 Nudo RJ, Friel KM, Delia SW. Role of sensory deficits in motor impairments after injury to primary motor cortex. Neuropharmacol. 2000;39:733-742.
101 Friel KM, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Dissociation of Sensorimotor Deficits After Rostral Versus Caudal Lesions in the Primary Motor Cortex Hand Representation. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:1312-1324.
102 Kruger L, Porter P. A behavioral study of the functions of the rolandic cortex in the monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1958;109:439-469.
103 Pavlides C, Miyashita E, Asanuma H. Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1983;70:733-741.
104 Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensorycortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:2119-2148.
105 Freund HJ. Somatosensory and motor disturbances in patients with parietal lobe lesions. Adv Neurol. 2003;93:179-193.
106 Caminiti R, Ferraina S, Johnson PB. The sources of visual information to the primate frontal lobe: a novel role for the superior parietal lobule. Cereb Cortex 1996;6:319-328.
107 Tanné J, Rouiller EM, Boussaoud D. Parietal Inputs to Dorsal versus Ventral Premotor Areas in the Macaque monkey: Evidence for largely Segregated Visuomotor Pathways. Exp Brain Res. 2002;145:91-103.
108 Johansson RS, Häger C, Bäckström L. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. III. Impairments during digital anesthesia. Exp Brain Res. 1992;89:204-213.
109 Lemon RN. Functional properties of monkey motor cortex neurones receiving afferent input from the hand and fingers. J Physiol. 1981;311:497-519.
110 Asanuma H. Microelectrode studies on the evoked activity of a single pyramidal tract cell in the somato-sensory area in cats. Jpn J Physiol. 1959;9:94-105.
111 Tanji J, Wise SP. Submodality distribution in sensorimotor cortex of the unanesthetized monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1981;45:467-481.
112 Wannier TM, Maier MA, Hepp-Reymond MC. Contrasting properties of monkey somatosensory and motor cortex neurons activated during the control of force in precision grip. J Neurophysiol. 1991;65:572-589.
113 Cardini F, Longo MR, Driver J, Haggard P. Rapid enhancement of touch from noninformative vision of the hand. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50:1954-1960.
114 Kaas JH. The evolution of the complex sensory and motor systems of the human brain. Brain Res Bull. 2008;75:384-390.
115 Glees P, Cole J. Recovery of skilled motor functions after small repeated lesions of motor cortex in macaque. J Neurophysiol. 1950;13:137-148.
116 Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:2144-2149.
117 Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791-1794.
118 Frost SB, Barbay S, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, Nudo RJ. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:3205-3214.
119 Frost SB, Chen D, Barbay S, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, Nudo RJ. Reorganization of Ventral Premotor Cortex After Ischemic Brain Injury: Effects of Forced Use. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2022;36:514-524.
120 Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Effects of subdural monopolar cortical stimulation paired with rehabilitative training on behavioral and neurophysiological recovery after cortical ischemic stroke in adult squirrel monkeys. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2016;30:159-172.
121 Plautz EJ, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Spared premotor areas undergo rapid nonlinear changes in functional organization following a focal ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 2023;43:2021-2032.
122 Friel KM, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Effects of a Rostral Motor Cortex Lesion on Primary Motor Cortex Hand Representation Topography in primates. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2007;21:51-61.
123 Murata Y., Higo, N., Hayashi, T., et al. Temporal Plasticity Involved in Recovery from Manual Dexterity Deficit after Motor Cortex Lesion in Macaque Monkeys. J Neurosci. 2015;35:84-95.
124 Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Rotella DL, et al. Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of dexterous movements. Exp Neurol. 2009;220:90-108.
125 Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Rotella DL, et al. Minimal forced use without constraint stimulates spontaneous use of the impaired upper extremity following motor cortex injury. Exp Brain Res. 210;202:529-542.
126 Darling WG, Helle N, Pizzimenti MA, et al. Laterality affects spontaneous recovery of contralateral hand motor function following motor cortex injury in rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 2013;228:9-24.
127 Darling WG, Morecraft RJ, Rotella D., et al. Recovery of precision grasping after motor cortex lesion does not require forced use of the impaired hand in macaca mulatta. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232:3929-3938.
128 Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Rotella DL, et al. Sensorimotor cortex injury effects on recovery of contralesional dexterous movements in Macaca mulatta. Exp Neurol. 2016;281:37-52.
129 McNeal DW, Darling WG, Ge J, et al. Selective long-term reorganization of the corticospinal projection from the supplementary motor cortex following recovery from lateral motor cortex injury. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:586-621.
130 Moore TL, Killiany RJ, Pessina MA, Moss MB, Finklestein SP, Rosene DL. Recovery from ischemia in the middle-aged brain: a nonhuman primate model. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:619.e9-619.e24
131 Moore TL, Pessina MA, Finklestein SP, Kramer BC, Killiany RJ, Rosene DL. Recovery of fine motor performance after ischemic damage to motor cortex is facilitated by cell therapy in the rhesus monkey. Somatosens Motor Res. 2013;30:185-196.
132 Moore TL, Pessina MA, Finklestein SP, et al. Inosine enhances recovery of grasp following cortical injury to the primary motor cortex of the rhesus monkey. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34:827-848.
133 Moore TL, Bowley BGE, Pessina MA, et al. Mesenchymal derived exosomes enhance recovery of motor function in a monkey model of cortical injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37:347-362.
134 Orczykowski ME, Arndt KR, Palitz LE, et al. Cell based therapy enhances activation of ventral premotor cortex to improve recovery following primary motor cortex injury. Exp Neurol. 2018;305:13-25.
135 Passingham RE, Perry VH, Wilkinson F. The long-term effects of removal of sensorimotor cortex in infant and adult rhesus monkeys. Brain. 1983;106:675-705.
136 Nudo RJ. Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:740-747.
137 Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:638-644.
138 Nudo RJ. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke. 2007;38:840-845.
139 Nudo RJ. Recovery after brain injury: mechanisms and principles. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:887.
140 Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10167-10179.
141 Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost SB, et al. Effects of Small Ischemic Lesions in the Primary Motor Cortex on Neurophysiological Organization in Ventral Premotor Cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:3506-3511.
142 Dancause N, Nudo RJ. Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury. Prog Brain Res. 2011;192:273-295.
143 Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, et al. Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Neurol. 2015;524:380-407.
144 Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, et al. Vulnerability of the Medial Frontal Corticospinal Projection Accompanies Combined Lateral Frontal and Parietal Cortex Injury in Rhesus Monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2015;523:669–697.
145 Orczykowski ME, Calderazzo SM, Shobin E, et al. Cell Based Therapy Reduces Secondary Damage and Increases Extent of Microglial Activation Following Cortical Injury. Brain Res. 2019;1717:147-159.
146 Yamamoto T, Hayashi T, Murata Y, Ose T, Higo N. Premotor Cortical-Cerebellar Reorganization in a Macaque Model of Primary Motor Cortical Lesion and Recovery. J Neurosci. 2019;39:8484-8496.
147 Moreau-Debord I, Serrano E, Quessy S, Dancause N. Rapid and Bihemispheric Reorganization of Neuronal Activity in Premotor Cortex after Brain Injury. J Neurosci. 2021; 41:9112-9128.
148 Calderazzo S, Covert M, De Alba D. et al. Neural recovery after cortical injury: Effects of MSC derived extracellular vesicles on motor circuit remodeling in rhesus monkeys. IBRO Neurosci Reports 2022;13:243-254.
149 Kim EH, Son JP, Oh GS, et al. Clinical Scale MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Enhance Poststroke Neuroplasticity in Rodents and Non-Human Primates. J Extracell Vesicles 2025;14:e70110.
150 Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A Functional MRI Study of Subjects Recovered From Hemiparetic Stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518-2527.
151 Liepert J, Hamzei F, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle & Nerve. 2000;23:1761-1763.
152 Schaechter JD, Perdue KL, Wang R. Structural damage to the corticospinal tract correlates with bilateral sensorimotor cortex reorganization in stroke patients. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1370-1382.
153 Schaechter JD, van Oers C, Groisser BN, et al. Increase in sensorimotor cortex response to somatosensory stimulation over subacute poststroke period correlates with motor recovery in hemiparetic patients. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2012;26:325-334.
154 Seitz RJ, Hoflich P, Binkofski F, Tellmann L, Herzog H, Freund HJ. Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1081–8.
155 Schwab ME. Nogo and axon regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:118–124.
156 Schwab ME. Functions of Nogo proteins and their receptors in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:799-811.
157 Freund P, Wannier T, Schmidlin E, et al. Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment enhances sprouting of corticospinal (CS) axons rostral to an unilateral cervical cord lesion in adult macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 2007; 502:644-659.
158 Bloch J, Kaeser M, Sadeghi Y, Rouiller EM, Redmond DE Jr., Brunet JF. Doublecortin-positive cells in the adult primate cerebral cortex and possible role in brain plasticity and development. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519:775-789.
159 Hermann DM, Chopp M. Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:369-380.
160 Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Promoting brain remodeling to aid in stroke recovery. Trends Mol Medicine 2015;21:543-548.
161 Zhang R, Zhang Z, Chopp M. Function of neural stem cells in ischemic brain repair processes.” J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol. 2016;36:2034-2043.
162 Go V, Bowley BGE, Pessina MA, et al. Extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells reduce microglial-mediated neuroinflammation after cortical injury in aged Rhesus monkeys. GeroSci. 2020;42:1-17.
163 Go V, Sarikaya D, Zhou Y, et al. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Myelin Maintenance after Cortical Injury in Aged Rhesus Monkeys.”Exp Neurol. 2020;337:113540. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113540
164 Medalla M, Chang W, Calderazzo SM, et al. Treatment with Mesenchymal-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Reduces Injury-Related Pathology in Pyramidal Neurons of Monkey Perilesional Ventral Premotor Cortex.” J Neurosci. 2020;40:3385-3407.
165 Zhou Y, Bhatt H, Mojica CA, et al. Mesenchymal‑derived extracellular vesicles enhance microglia‑mediated synapse remodeling after cortical injury in aging Rhesus monkeys. J Neuroinflamm. 2023;20:201:1-29.
166 McCann RP, Bowley B, Pessina M, et al. Reduction of inflammatory biomarkers underlies extracellular vesicle mediated functional recovery in an aged monkey model of cortical injury. Front Aging Neurosci. 2025;17:16051 44. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1605144
167 Rouiller EM. Re-examination and extension of manual dexterity behavioral data in M1 lesioned adult macaque monkeys: a survey of therapies induced enhancement of functional recovery. 2025. (Submitted).
168 Darling WG, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Rotella DL, Pizzimenti MA, Morecraft RJ. Hand Motor Recovery Following Extensive Frontoparietal Cortical Injury Is Accompanied by Upregulated Corticoreticular Projections in Monkey. J Neurosci. 2018;38:6323-6339.
169 Fetz EE, Cheney PD, Mewes K, Palmer S. Control of forelimbmuscle activity by populations of corticomotoneuronal and rubromotoneuronal cells. Prog Brain Res. 1989:80:437-449, discussion 427-430.
170 Glover IS, Baker SN. Cortical, corticospinal, and reticulospinalcontributions to strength training. J Neurosci. 2020;40:5820-5832.
171 Glover IS, Baker SN. Both corticospinal and reticulospinal tracts control force of contraction. J Neurosci. 2022;42:3150-3164.
172 Zaaimi B, Soteropoulos DS, Fisher KM, Riddle CN, Baker SN. Classification of neurons in the primate reticular formation and changes after recovery from pyramidal tract lesion. J Neurosci. 2018;38:6190–206.
173 Zaaimi B, Dean LR, Baker SN. Different contributions of primary motor cortex, reticular formation, and spinal cord to fractionated muscle activation. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119:235-250.