Efficacy of a Community-Based Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Improving Function in Older Adults
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose and Hypothesis: The purpose of this investigation was to analyze objective measures of endurance, balance, and strength following 4 and 12 weeks of participation in a combined volunteer and student run Phase III cardiovascular wellness program at a public university. It was hypothesized that improvements in objective tests of balance, strength, and endurance will be noted following completion of one month and three months of the program.
Methods: A prospective observational longitudinal design explored changes in function in 51 ambulatory patients attending a Phase III community-based cardiac rehabilitation clinic. Functional measures assessed including 3 minutes of stepping, 6-minute walk test, gait speed test, Timed Up and Go test, 30 second chair rise test, along with assessment of absolute and relative quadricep strength using a handheld dynamometer. Measurements were collected by two designated data collectors at enrollment into the study (data visit 1), after 4-weeks (data visit 2) and after 12-weeks (data visit 3). All subjects received routine Phase III cardiac rehabilitation that combined monitored aerobic exercise and strengthening exercises during the 12-week participation period. Subjects voluntarily participated in the program and attended on average 2 sessions per week.
Results: 33 females and 18 males with mean age 74 + 9 years, mean weight 76 + 14 kg. who were registered participants in the community clinic, participated in this study. A repeated measures ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences over the course of 12 weeks in 6-minute walk scores (F=10.98, p<0.01); absolute strength scores (F=4.07, p=0.02) and relative strength scores (F=3.15, p=0.04). Changes in 30 second chair rise scores neared significance (F=2.80, p=0.06). No statistically significant differences were noted from baseline to 12 weeks for gait speed, timed up and go test, and 3-minute step test scores. (p> 0.05)
Conclusion: With the growing number of patients in the community with heart disease, it is imperative to investigate new delivery models including the use of a community-based wellness program that may be effective in improving patient outcomes. This investigation reports meaningful improvements in 6-minute walk test and quadricep strength scores in individuals receiving Phase III cardiac rehabilitation within a community-based clinic. Standardized care was not provided during the course of the intervention. Future studies should examine the use of a standardized intervention to further validate the effectiveness of community-based programs in improving functional outcomes in older individuals with heart disease.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Martin SS, Aday AW, Allen NB, et al. 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2025;151(8):e41-e660. doi:10.1161/ CIR.0000000000001303/SUPPL_FILE/SUB-SAHARAN
3. Beatty AL, Beckie TM, Dodson J, et al. A New Era in Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery: Research Gaps, Questions, Strategies, and Priorities. Circulation. 2023;147(3):254-266. doi:10.1161/CIR CULATIONAHA.122.061046/ASSET/5439B984-B9 6D-4553-B4E6-F27670B9BD6E/ASSETS/GRAPHIC /CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061046.FIG02.JPG
4. Taylor RS, Walker S, Ciani O, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for chronic heart failure: The EXTRAMATCH II individual participant data meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2019;23(25):1-97. doi:10.3310/HTA23250
5. Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011;162(4). doi:10.1016/J.AHJ.2011.07.017
6. Oldridge N, Pakosh M, Grace SL. A systematic review of recent cardiac rehabilitation meta-analyses in patients with coronary heart disease or heart failure. Taylor & FrancisN Oldridge, M Pakosh, SL GraceFuture cardiology, 2019•Taylor & Francis. 2019;15(3):227-250. doi:10.2217/FCA-2018-0085
7. Goel K, Pack QR, Lahr B, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation is associated with reduced long-term mortality in patients undergoing combined heart valve and CABG surgery. academic.oup.comK Goel, QR Pack, B Lahr, KL Greason, F Lopez-Jimenez, RW Squires, Z Zhang, RJ ThomasEuropean journal of preventive cardiology, 2015•academic.oup. com. 2015;22(2):159-168. doi:10.1177/2047487313512219
8. Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corrà U, et al. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(5):460-495. doi:10.1177/2047487320913379
9. Thompson PD, Buchner D, Piña IL, et al. Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A statement from the council on clinical cardiology (subcommittee on exercise, rehabilitation, and prevention) and the council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism (subcommittee on physical activity). Circulation. 2003;107(24):3109-3116. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000075572.40158.77
10. Brown TM, Pack QR, Aberegg E, et al. Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: 2024 Update: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2024;150(18):e328-e347. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001289/SUPPL_FILE/BROWN_SUPPLEMENTAL_MATERIAL.PDF
11. Ritchey MD, Maresh S, McNeely J, et al. Tracking cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion among Medicare beneficiaries to inform the efforts of a national initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. Published online 2020. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005902
12. Patel RS, Tragante V, Schmidt AF, et al. Subsequent Event Risk in Individuals With Established Coronary Heart Disease. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019;12(4):e002470. doi:10.1161/CI RCGEN.119.002470
13. Salzwedel A, Jensen K, Rauch B, et al. Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence based medicine: Update of the. academic.oup. com A Salzwedel, K Jensen, B Rauch, P Doherty, MI Metzendorf, M Hackbusch, H VöllerEuropean journal of preventive cardiology, 2020•academic. oup.com. 2020;27(16):1756-1774. doi:10.1177/20 47487320905719
14. Abraham LN, Sibilitz KL, Berg SK, et al. Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery. cochranelibrary.comLN Abraham, KL Sibilitz, SK Berg, LH Tang, SS Risom, J Lindschou, RS TaylorCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021•cochranelibrary.com. 2021;2021(5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010876.PUB3/FULL/ID
15. Fuertes-Kenneally L, Blasco-Peris C, Casanova-Lizón A, et al. Effects of high-intensity interval training on vascular function in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2023;14. doi:10. 3389/FPHYS.2023.1196665,
16. O’Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: HF-ACTION Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2009;301(14):1439. doi:10.1001/JAMA.2009.454
17. Dibben G, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;2021(11). doi:10.1002/14651858.C D001800.PUB4/MEDIA/CDSR/CD001800/IMAGE_T/TCD001800-CMP-001.10.PNG
18. Laurin JL, Reid JJ, Lawrence MM, Miller BF. Long-term aerobic exercise preserves muscle mass and function with age. Curr Opin Physiol. 2019;10: 70-74. doi:10.1016/J.COPHYS.2019.04.019
19. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903. doi:10.1093 /PTJ/80.9.896
20. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):743-749. doi:1 0.1111/J.1532-5415.2006.00701.X,
21. Montero-Odasso M, Schapira M, Soriano ER, et al. Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2005;60(10):1304-1309. doi:10.1093/GERONA/60.10.1304,
22. Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Development and Validation of Criterion-Referenced Clinically Relevant Fitness Standards for Maintaining Physical Independence in Later Years. Gerontologist. 2013;53(2):255-267. doi:10.1093/GERONT/GNS071