SPIRITIST INVOLVEMENT AS A THEORETICAL, CLINICAL, AND PSYCHOMETRIC CATEGORY IN MENTAL HEALTH

Main Article Content

Tiago Medeiros Sales Rosa Maria Salani Mota Raimunda Hermelinda Maia Macena

Abstract

This article presents Spiritist Involvement as a theoretical, clinical, and psychometric category in the field of mental health through the development and validation of the Spiritist Involvement Form (FENE). The instrument was created based on a theoretical review, expert evaluation, and pilot testing, and applied in a cross-sectional study with 848 participants in the state of Ceará during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results indicated that higher levels of spiritist involvement were associated with lower prevalence of severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidal ideation. In multivariate analysis, participants with regular to very high spiritist involvement before the pandemic had a 62% reduction in the likelihood of severe suicidal ideation during the pandemic (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.16-0.90). The FENE demonstrated theoretical, semantic, and empirical validity, enabling the measurement of Spiritist Involvement as a continuous variable, relevant for clinical and epidemiological research, as well as for planning culturally sensitive mental health public policies.

Keywords: spirituality; Spiritism; mental health; suicidal ideation; psychometric instrument.

Article Details

How to Cite
SALES, Tiago Medeiros; MOTA, Rosa Maria Salani; MACENA, Raimunda Hermelinda Maia. SPIRITIST INVOLVEMENT AS A THEORETICAL, CLINICAL, AND PSYCHOMETRIC CATEGORY IN MENTAL HEALTH. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 10, oct. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7042>. Date accessed: 15 nov. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i10.7042.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. SALES TM. Magnitude e fatores associados ao envolvimento espírita, transtornos mentais comuns e ideação suicida: um estudo seccional no Ceará. Tese (Doutorado em Saúde Pública) – Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2023. Disponível em:
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/73964.

2. DALGALARRONDO P. Religião, psicopatologia e saúde mental. 1. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007. v. 1.

3. PIRES JH. Introdução à filosofia espírita. São Paulo: Paideia, 1983.

4. IDLER E, et al. Partnerships between public health agencies and faith communities. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(3):346–347.

5. SITHEY G, et al. Socioeconomic, religious, spiritual and health factors associated with symptoms of common mental disorders: a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness Study, 2015. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2):e018202.

6. LAWRENCE RE, OQUENDO MA, STANLEY B. Religion and suicide risk: a systematic review. Arch Suicide Res. 2016;20(1):1–21.

7. MANDHOUJ O, et al. Characteristics of spirituality and religion among suicide attempters. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016;204(11):861–867.

8. BAZLEY R, PAKENHAM K, WATSON B. Perspectives on suicide prevention amongst members of Christian faith-based organizations. Community Ment Health J. 2019;55(5):831–839.

9. SALES TM, MOTA RMS, MACENA RHM. Formulário Deenvolvimento Espírita (FENE): desenvolvimento e validação de um instrumento de avaliação do nível desenvolvimento espírita. Fortaleza: UFC, 2023. Disponível em: http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/74736.

10. KOENIG HG. Espiritualidade no cuidado com o paciente. Artmed, 2012.

11. MOREIRA-ALMEIDA A. Espiritualidade e saúde: passado e futuro de uma relação controversa e desafiadora. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2007; 34:3–4.

12. MOREIRA-ALMEIDA A, et al. Envolvimento religioso e fatores sociodemográficos: resultados de um levantamento nacional no Brasil. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2010;37(1):12–15.

13. PERES JFP, SIMÃO MJP, NASELLO AG. Espiritualidade, religiosidade e psicoterapia. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2007;34:136–145.

14. PASQUALI L. Princípios de elaboração de escalas. In: GORENSTEIN C, WANG Y, editors. Instrumentos de avaliação em saúde mental. 1. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2016.

15. PARKER C, SCOTT S, GEDDES A. Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations, 2019.

16. LOVIBOND PF, LOVIBOND SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–343.

17. BRASIL; MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE; CONSELHO NACIONAL DE SAÚDE. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Diário Oficial da União, 2012.

18. HART, CW, Koenig, HG. (2020). Religion and health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health, 59, 1141-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01042-3.

19. LADIM, J de SP, Jorge, MM, Souza, MC dos S, Borges, M da S (2023). Perspectivas da espiritualidade e da religiosidade no enfrentamento da pandemia por COVID-19. Revista De Enfermagem Da UFJF, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.34019/2446-5739.2022.v8.39624

20. LUCCHETTI, G et al. Spirituality, religiosity and the mental health consequences of social isolation during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, v. 67, n. 6, p. 672-679, 2 set. 2021.

21. NUNE, EDS, Costa Nunes-Júnior, R., Tairla Viana Gonçalves, M., Nascimento Soares, M., Rhuan Vasco-Dos-Santos, D., & Cerilo-Filho, M. (2023). A ESPIRITUALIDADE COMO FERRAMENTA NO ENFRENTAMENTO DA COVID-19. Psicologia E Saúde Em Debate, 9(2), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.22289/2446-922X.V9N2A24.