Barriers to Publication: Examining Bias Against Manuscript Acceptance from Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Main Article Content

Carolyn Sun, PhD, RN, ANP-BC, FAAN, FAMIA http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9628-6901 Christina Litavec, BSN, RN, CCRN http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9166-3271

Abstract

Despite increasing global contributions to science, researchers from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) continue to face disproportionate barriers to publishing in high-impact, peer-reviewed journals. These barriers are not solely due to the quality of research but are also shaped by structural inequities and implicit biases embedded within the global publishing ecosystem. This paper examines the mechanisms and consequences of such bias, including disparities in editorial representation, linguistic hurdles, topic devaluation, and systemic underfunding. Drawing on recent studies, experiences, and our own global initiatives to improve access to mentorship in scholarly writing, we highlight the persistence of these biases and their impact on the visibility, credibility, and influence of LMIC scholarship. We further explore how the gendered nature of the nursing profession, and broader patriarchal structures in academia, contribute to the suppression of knowledge produced by women and nurses in LMICs. Finally, we propose actionable recommendations to improve equity and representation in global scientific publishing. By improving equitable publishing practices, more diverse research can be disseminated. We hope readers find this editorial helpful in examining their own perspectives, identities, and potential biases and how they may influence their work.

Keywords: publication bias, low- and middle-income countries, peer review, global health, gender bias, equity in research, scientific publishing, nursing

Article Details

How to Cite
SUN, Carolyn; LITAVEC, Christina. Barriers to Publication: Examining Bias Against Manuscript Acceptance from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 12, dec. 2025. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/7085>. Date accessed: 02 jan. 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i12.7085.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000;320(7249):1574-1577. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574
2. Rohra DK. Representation of less-developed countries in Pharmacology journals: an online survey of corresponding authors. BMC medical research methodology. 2011;11(1):60.
3. Chu KM, Jayaraman S, Kyamanywa P, Ntakiyiruta G. Building research capacity in Africa: equity and global health collaborations. PLoS Med. 2014;11(3):e1001612.
4. Horton R. Medical journals: evidence of bias against the diseases of poverty. The Lancet. 2003;361(9359):712-713.
5. Nolde-Lopez B, Bundus J, Arenas-Castro H, et al. Language barriers in organismal biology: what can journals do better? Integrative Organismal Biology. 2023;5(1):obad003.
6. Woods WA, Watson M, Ranaweera S, Tajuria G, Sumathipala A. Under-representation of low and middle income countries (LMIC) in the research literature: ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals: have the trends changed? Global public health. 2023;18(1):2229890.
7. Health Workforce (HWF). State of the world's nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership. 2020:116.
8. Dillard-Wright J, Valderama-Wallace C, Canty L, Perron A, De Sousa I, Gullick J. What nursing chooses not to know: Practices of epistemic silence/silencing. Nursing Philosophy. 2023;24(3):e12443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12443
9. Rodrigues ML, Savino W, Goldenberg S. processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e220064.
10. Gardner UG, Jr., Thompson PS, Burton J, et al. Article Processing Charge Waiver Policies as a Barrier to Oncology Scholarship in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries. JCO Glob Oncol. Aug 2021;7:1413-1417. doi:10.1200/go.21.00143
11. Kisely S. Predatory journals and dubious publishers: how to avoid being their prey. BJPsych Advances. 2019;25(2):113-119. doi:10.1192/bja.2018.56
12. Sun C, Kulage KM, Al‐Touby S, Nyamakura R, Larson E. Promoting nursing research globally: the writing to improve nursing science (WINS) program. International Nursing Review. 2019;66(4):541-548.
13. Skopec M, Issa H, Reed J, Harris M. The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020;5:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0088-0
14. Brück O. A bibliometric analysis of geographic disparities in the authorship of leading medical journals. Communications Medicine. 2023/12/11 2023;3(1):178. doi:10.1038/s43856-023-00418-2
15. Sun C, Jia, H, Larson, E. Factors associated with clinical nursing and midwifery research in southern and eastern African countries. Evidence-based Medicine & Public Health. 2016;
16. McNeil Jr. DG. Little Research Is Done in Africa by or for Nurses. The New York Times. Accessed November 29, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/14/health/little-research-is-done-in-africa-by-or-for-nurses.html
17. Pincha Baduge MSDS, Garth B, Boyd L, et al. Barriers to advancing women nurses in healthcare leadership: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. eClinicalMedicine. 2024;67doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102354
18. Gea-Caballero V, Ruíz de Viñaspre-Hernández R, Saus-Ortega C, et al. Gender equity in the scientific nursing journals indexed in Journal Citation Reports: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in public health. 2023;11:1119117.
19. Kim L, Smith DS, Hofstra B, McFarland DA. Gendered knowledge in fields and academic careers. Research Policy. 2022/01/01/ 2022;51(1):104411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104411
20. Masibo RM, Kibusi SM, Masika GM. Gender dynamics in nursing profession: impact on professional practice and development in Tanzania. BMC Health Services Research. 2024/10/04 2024;24(1):1179. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11641-5
21. Tricco AC, Nincic V, Darvesh N, et al. Global evidence of gender equity in academic health research: a scoping review. BMJ open. 2023;13(2):e067771.
22. Hohlfeld A, Kredo T, Clarke M. A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials. Systematic Reviews. 2024/12/20 2024;13(1):310. doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5
23. Bol JA, Sheffel A, Zia N, Meghani A. How to address the geographical bias in academic publishing. BMJ Glob Health. Dec 21 2023;8(12)doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013111
24. Kazembe A, Simwaka A, Dougherty K, et al. Experiences of women with physical disabilities accessing prenatal care in low‐and middle‐income countries. Public Health Nursing. 2022;39(5):1156-1166.
25. Nabolsi M, Safadi R, Sun C, et al. The health-related quality of life of Syrian refugee women in their reproductive age. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9990.
26. Khalaf I, Sun C. Trends in Nursing Research in Jordan 2013-2016. Rep Glob Health Res: RGHR-103 DOI. 2018;10