A retrospective review of continuous epidural analgesia following posterior spinal instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background context: Epidural analgesia has been demonstrated to be effective in managing post-operative pain across many surgical procedures including posterior spinal instrumented fusion. Since the inception of our paediatric orthopaedic spinal unit in 2015, continuous epidural analgesia has been provided to all posterior spinal instrumented fusion patients. This study presents data validating the safety and utility of continuous epidural analgesia.
Purpose: The study was set out to assess the safety and utility of continuous epidural analgesia used for post-operative pain control after all posterior spinal instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Quantitative metrics known to relate to analgesic safety and post-operative recovery were selected for review.
Study Design: A retrospective clinical study of 83 patients was conducted via electronic medical chart review of records from 06/01/2020 to 19/12/2022 from this centre.
Methods: Data regarding the perioperative recovery and side effects of this group (i.e. days to mobilisation, first bowel motion, return to full diet and length of hospital stay) were compared to those who had no change to their neurological examination. Statistical analysis was performed using student’s T-test and logistic regression modelling, using SPSS1.
Results: Fifty-seven patients (68%) experienced no change of their neurological examination, whilst 26 patients (32%) did, while undergoing epidural analgesia. Time to achieve post-operative outcomes was similar between groups. Occurrence of a temporary neurological change did not relate to higher rates of secondary complications.
Conclusion: The association of temporary neurological changes with the use of continuous epidural analgesia for control of post-operative pain following posterior spinal instrumented fusion does not impede the attainment of post-operative milestones, nor do they elevate the risk of secondary complications.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Bajwa SJS, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015;6(3):105. doi:10.4103/0974-8237.161589
3. Kanaan SF, Melton BL, Waitman LR, Simpson MH, Sharma NK. The effect of age and gender on acute postoperative pain and function following lumbar spine surgeries. Physiotherapy Research International. 2021;26(2). doi:10.1002/pri.1888
4. Zheng H, Schnabel A, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, et al. Age and preoperative pain are major confounders for sex differences in postoperative pain outcome: A prospective database analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178659
5. Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017;Volume 10:2287-2298. doi:10.2147/JP R.S144066
6. Motamed C. Clinical Update on Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain. Pharmacy 2022, Vol 10, Page 22. 2022;10(1):22. doi:10.3390/P HARMACY10010022
7. Seki H, Ideno S, Ishihara T, Watanabe K, Matsumoto M, Morisaki H. Postoperative pain management in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A narrative review. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018;13 (1). doi:10.1186/s13013-018-0165-z
8. Amaranath L, Andrish JT, Gurd AR, Weiker GG, Yoon H. Efficacy of intermittent epidural morphine following posterior spinal fusion in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;249:223-226. doi:10.1097/00003086-198912000-00024
9. Agarwal A, Kishore K. Complications And Controversies Of Regional Anaesthesia: A Review. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53(5):543. Accessed October 23, 2023. /pmc/articles/PMC2900086/
10. Van Boerum DH, Smith JT, Curtin MJ. A Comparison of the Effects of Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Intravenous Opioids Versus Epidural Analgesia on Recovery After Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(18). https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2000/09150/A_Comparison_of_the_Effects_of_Patient_Controlled.14.aspx
11. Milbrandt TA, Singhal M, Minter C, et al. A Comparison of Three Methods of Pain Control for Posterior Spinal Fusions in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(14). https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2009/06150/A_Comparison_of_Three_Methods_of_Pain_Control_for.14.aspx
12. Klatt JWB, Mickelson J, Hung M, Durcan S, Miller C, Smith JT. A Randomized Prospective Evaluation of 3 Techniques of Postoperative Pain Management After Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(19). https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2013/09010/A_Randomized_Prospective_Evaluation_of_3.3.aspx
13. Halpern LM, Velarde AR, Zhang DA, Bronson W, Kogan C. Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA) via Single Catheter Providing Profound Analgesia for Pediatric Patients Following Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Cureus. 2023;15(4). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.37066
14. Gauger VT, Voepel-Lewis TD, Burke CN, et al. Epidural Analgesia Compared With Intravenous Analgesia After Pediatric Posterior Spinal Fusion. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2009;29(6). https://journals.lww.com/pedorthopaedics/Fulltext/2009/09000/Epidural_Analgesia_Compared_With_Intravenous.11.aspx
15. Hong R, Gauger V, Caird MS, Burke C. Narcotic-only Epidural Infusion for Posterior Spinal Fusion Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Review. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2016; 36(5). https://journals.lww.com/pedorthopaedics/Fulltext/2016/07000/Narcotic_only_Epidural_Infusion_for_Posterior.20.aspx
16. CASSADY J. A randomized comparison of the effects of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after posterior spinal fusion in adolescents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25(3):246-253. doi:10.1016/S1098-7339(00)90006-3
17. Erdogan MA, Ozgul U, Ucar M, et al. Patient-controlled Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Epidural Infusion for Posterior Spinal Fusion After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017; 42(12). https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Fulltext/2017/06150/Patient_controlled_Intermittent_Epidural_Bolus.3.aspx
18. O’Hara JF, Cywinski JB, Tetzlaff JE, Xu M, Gurd AR, Andrish JT. The effect of epidural vs intravenous analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(12):1009-1015. doi:10.1111/J.1460-9592.2004.01387.X
19. Colón LF, Powell C, Wilson A, Burgan T, Quigley R. Rapid recovery pathway without epidural catheter analgesia for surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study. Spine Deform. 2023;11(2):373-381. doi:10.1007/s43390-022-00587-5
20. Prabhu PJ, Prabhu PJ. Epidural: Loss of Resistance. Epidural Administration - New Perspectives and Uses. Published online February 7, 2023. doi:10.5772/INTECHOPEN.109947
21. Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Respiratory Depression Associated with Neuraxial Opioid AdministrationAn Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine*. Anesthesiology. 2016;124(3): 535-552. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000975
22. Blumenthal S, Min K, Nadig M, Borgeat A. Double epidural catheter with ropivacaine versus intravenous morphine: a comparison for postoperative analgesia after scoliosis correction surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(1):175-180. doi:10.1097/0 0000542-200501000-00026
23. O’Hara JF, Cywinski JB, Tetzlaff JE, Xu M, Gurd AR, Andrish JT. The effect of epidural vs intravenous analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(12):1009-1015. doi:10.1111/J.1460-9592.2004.01387.X
24. Van Boerum DH, Smith JT, Curtin MJ. A comparison of the effects of patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous opioids Versus epidural analgesia on recovery after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(18):2355-2357. doi:10.1097/00007632-200009150-00014
25. Milbrandt TA, Singhal M, Minter C, et al. A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(14):1499-1503. doi:10.1097/BRS.0B013E3181A90CEB
26. Cavallaro P, Bordeianou L. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Colorectal Surgery: Implementation of an ERAS Pathway in Colorectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(2):102. doi:10.1055/S-0038-1676474
27. Koesanthia S, Wongkongkam K, Danaidutsadeekul S, Thawitsri T. Impact of Early Mobility Programme on Open Abdominal Surgery Patients’ Post-Operative Bowel Function Recovery during the First 72 Hours. The Journal of Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council. 2022;37(02):61-80. Accessed October 23, 2023. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJONC/article/view/255452
28. Klatt JWB, Mickelson J, Hung M, Durcan S, Miller C, Smith JT. A randomized prospective evaluation of 3 techniques of postoperative pain management after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(19):1626-1631. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829cab0b
29. Ketwaroo GA, Cheng V, Lembo A. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013;15(9). doi:10.1007/S11894-013-0344-2